Jump to content

'Armed' men storm occupy in Leamington Spa, say police


gsingh9
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, StarStriker said:

I sense multiple id's....pathetic!

"Self-proclaimed parcharak"......right and wat? Who's permission does he need u fool? Lol how many take him seriously? Oh i dont kno......maybe 46,000+ who have subscribed to his channel, and all those lapsed sikhs/muslims/atheist/hindus who have become sikhs and taken amrit from around the world. Typical of our "own-ppl", who love luthh-kicching others who r actually doing something. If u dont like it, open ur own sikhi channel/org/charity n do something, otherwise zip it.

yep it's usual suspects again...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those complaining that people from different faiths should not be stopped from having an Anand Karaj, have you actually read and understand what each laav means. There is translation of it, it's not too difficult to find it.  Actually a Gurdwara committee should show and explain those that want mixed faith marriage by the Anand Karaj process a translation as well as in Gurmukhi. 

It's not rocket science to understand it, even non -Sikhs understand it.  Why should a non - Sikh, bow down to the Guru and make a promise that they will do something that they are not going?  Isn't that forcing somebody to just do it for the sake of it for one day? Not only are the Sikhs that are making them doing it making fools of themselves, but also don't have respect for somebody else's faith or religion and making fools of them too.  

Nobody is stopping anybody from having a blessing and Ardas done, or a paat. Why can't people except that and respect Guruji rather than please people.  Is it because they wouldn't want to sit through the paat, but instead want to see and walk around in circles with all flashy rang barangeh clothes on, but not know why they are doing it?

How many of you would go to another faiths establishment and bow down and make a promise that you know you cannot keep?

Not many I guess, so what is wrong if for once, Sikhs are doing the right thing, which should have been done years ago.

I've explained it to my friends that are non-Sikh, why and the reasons and they seem to accept it.  One of my friends is Hindu/Punjabi and she was saying same how it's racist, this and that.  Racism has nothing to do with it, and when I explained it, she said, "yes you are right, I didn't know that's why one shouldn't have the Anand Karaj,in the Gurdwara as it's making a false promise to the Guru, and it's like forceful conversion and disrespectful to the Guru.  " 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
    • The printer is C J Amritsar… They have given a mobile number for India …
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use