The above mentioned names have varying degrees of "missionary" ideology, not clear cut . Best if we not group them , It will only lead to further consolidation on that side and cause even further polarization. Some of the mentioned individuals are in fact contributing quite positively ( given not all their views are palatable to the samapardaic mind). Udoke and Makhu make some very good youtube videos for example. Udoke's current June 1984 videos are very informative.
We have to keep the Panth united at all costs, imo. Dissent and counter views should be given a certain freedom, as long they don't become damaging to our unity. Both sides need to keep the focus on what really matters for the average sikh at the moment. Questions about our history, maryada, philosophy need a mature approach. It really boils down to facts and faith. Whenever any individual from either side strays too far out, they need to be disciplined. Keeping a hawk-eyed approach, instead of dog-eat-dog approach will help in both our unity and future scholarship.
Banyan tree's Banyan trees look so ancient iv seen one near our pind
Nankana Sahib 1922
Panja Sahib 1932
Original Qila at Anandpur sahib
Qila Anandgarh Sahib, does that mean that the big red building Qila Anandgarh is not the original Qila? that u see at Anandpur Sahib?
1945 Shes beautiful!!