London bridge attack by islamic salafi devil worshippers

[genie]

16 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

What does everyone think of the recent call to not particpate in the election as a Sikh way to distance us from the british parties ? seems a bit too 'cutting one's nose off to spite one's face' and also something hinduvta who'd love given JCs rising star in case he got in

Don't listen to them, that's a moronic idea probably by someone with low IQ or an anti-sikh agenda. If Sikhs don't participate in electing politicians who represents us then they are fools.

We just need to recall what happened when Sikhs chose not to take part in elections back In 1980s punjab after the Indian terrorist operation bluestar and operation wood rose the m0ronic leaders called Sikhs to boycott the elections and not even urging people to elect the Sikh separatist parties. Back then there was huge support from the punjab and Sikh masses enough to have elected people like simranjeet singh mann to power he was and has always lead a pro-khalistan agenda party. But sadly Sikh masses stayed away from the election and the anti-sikh congress punjab party came into power thanks to hindu punjabi extremists which lead to further bloodshed and indian state terrorism within punjab.

 

[MisterrSingh]

The violent implementation of the poisonous ideology of Muslims and their jihadis shouldn't be explained away as a side effect of foreign policy, BUT these western countries have  - and continue to - play an intricate and hellish game of chess. Jihadis are the pawns; the useful idiots designed to be pushed to the front and distract everyone whilst the real machinations are occurring behind closed doors. When the time comes the jihadis are going to put down like dogs almost immediately. They don't think it will ever happen. They think they're in control; that their Mahdi will arrive as their prophecies have stated, but that's bull. When enough people have died, the answer to the world's problems will suddenly be discovered by the Western powers. The problem is that in the meantime there's going to be a hell of a lot of suffering and destruction and death.

If Iran really is the unfortunate next chapter in this horror story, I hope these western satanic governments regret their devilish ways. 

Today, the overwhelming emotion I'm experiencing is one of sadness for the victims of such atrocities wherever they may occur, but I also feel as if I'm being made a fool of. I'm not sure where that's coming from.

[Premi5]

5 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

The following should be read by anyone who wants to understand the 'why' behind the Manchester and yesterday's attacks. It's an article written by a journalist called John Pilger.

 

Iran is not like other countries, the West would fail if they tried to occupy Iran

[MisterrSingh]

40 minutes ago, Premi5 said:

Iran is not like other countries, the West would fail if they tried to occupy Iran

Could Iran fend off the collective force of the U.S., U.K., Israel, other NATO forces, and the Saudis? I don't know whether that's possible unless Russia got involved. Iran have said in the past that as soon as they're attacked by a foreign power, they would lay waste to Saudi Arabia, leaving only Mecca standing. That's one mighty threat, and if the worst ever happens I hope they deliver on that threat.

[Guest Jacfsing2]

1 hour ago, Premi5 said:

Iran is not like other countries, the West would fail if they tried to occupy Iran

Your being silly aren't you? 

[genie]

47 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

Could Iran fend off the collective force of the U.S., U.K., Israel, other NATO forces, and the Saudis? I don't know whether that's possible unless Russia got involved. Iran have said in the past that as soon as they're attacked by a foreign power, they would lay waste to Saudi Arabia, leaving only Mecca standing. That's one mighty threat, and if the worst ever happens I hope they deliver on that threat.

I would say Iran is pretty powerful militarily its not the 3rd world tin pot basket case that some simpletons in the west believe it is. Iran has developed underground nuclear weapons program that cant be penetrated by even bunker busting bombs that the american's used against other muslim countries to take out people and infrastructure. Also it has a pretty decent army, navy and long range missile program.

Also Iran doesn't really want war with the west, they know it wont be good outcome for them nor the soldiers of the west that take part. With each islamic salafi jihadi attack on the west they have always condemned it via their foreign secretary but the saudis haven't to my knowledge.

Iran would not be occupied by the west or its allies for long if they ever did manage to remove the regime you would just get another Iraq failed state but this time shia extremism which would probably target more jewish / zionist israeli interests rather than european.

I personally would love to see saudi and other sunni salafi supporting gulf arab regimes reduced to ashes. So if Iran could do that for the world it would be a great gift. However the main enemy of humanity are the funders of terrorism the rich 0.1 % of humanity the so called "elites" usually from the west. They are playing a game of thrones on a huge geo-political world stage chess board with rest of 99.9% of humanity as its pawns.

 

[MisterrSingh]

15 minutes ago, genie said:

I would say Iran is pretty powerful militarily its not the 3rd world tin pot basket case that some simpletons in the west believe it is. Iran has developed underground nuclear weapons program that cant be penetrated by even bunker busting bombs that the american's used against other muslim countries to take out people and infrastructure. Also it has a pretty decent army, navy and long range missile program.

Also Iran doesn't really want war with the west, they know it wont be good outcome for them nor the soldiers of the west that take part. With each islamic salafi jihadi attack on the west they have always condemned it via their foreign secretary but the saudis haven't to my knowledge.

Iran would not be occupied by the west or its allies for long if they ever did manage to remove the regime you would just get another Iraq failed state but this time shia extremism which would probably target more jewish / zionist israeli interests rather than european.

I personally would love to see saudi and other sunni salafi supporting gulf arab regimes reduced to ashes. So if Iran could do that for the world it would be a great gift. However the main enemy of humanity are the funders of terrorism the rich 0.1 % of humanity the so called "elites" usually from the west. They are playing a game of thrones on a huge geo-political world stage chess board with rest of 99.9% of humanity as its pawns.

 

The history of Iran is quite sad. The Islamisation of Iran was a tragedy, and actually there are many history revisionists who enjoy claiming that it was the advent of Islam that spurred such civilisations to make various scientific and social advancements that benefitted the world, but those developments occured in spite of Islam, not because of it.

Iran is a wonderful country with generally wonderful people. The leadership is dodgy, but they aren't the villains the West paints them to be. Makes you wonder how strong the West's propaganda and indoctrination game has been throughout the past 100 years. Ever wonder whether we might be on the "wrong" side, lol?

[jkvlondon]

18 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

The history of Iran is quite sad. The Islamisation of Iran was a tragedy, and actually there are many history revisionists who enjoy claiming that it was the advent of Islam that spurred such civilisations to make various scientific and social advancements that benefitted the world, but those developments occured in spite of Islam, not because of it.

Iran is a wonderful country with generally wonderful people. The leadership is dodgy, but they aren't the villains the West paints them to be. Makes you wonder how strong the West's propaganda and indoctrination game has been throughout the past 100 years. Ever wonder whether we might be on the "wrong" side, lol?

you can see that they are relatively open minded in terms of using non-islamic texts to instruct their people's at Post-graduate level in persian , Tehran university is using Guru Pita ji's Zafarnama in their syllabus. They want to remain culturally enriched and have not burned/blown up older cultures art/relics unlike the desert yobs

[jkvlondon]

majid nawaz is advertising his four point plan on LBC to be taken up by govt...it's BS he's doubletalking them into sleeping again.

[MisterrSingh]

18 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

majid nawaz is advertising his four point plan on LBC to be taken up by govt...it's BS he's doubletalking them into sleeping again.

The more I read into this guy and hear him speak the more I'm beginning to suspect something's not quite right with him.