Jump to content

“If jarnail singh wasn’t in Akaal takhat, then it would not have been destroyed”


Guest Confused
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Lt. Gen. SK Sinha disclosed that a replica of the Golden Temple complex was built 18 months before the operation, for army preparations and rehearsels. This was before Bhindranwale shifted to the Akal Takth.
  • If the operation had been planned meticulously and well in time, why was the attack launched on a holy day for the Sikhs?
  • Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale was present in the Akal Takth only, why were 38 other Gurdwaras across Punjab attacked by the army as well resulting in the loss of hundreds of Sikh lives?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The attack on Harmandir Sahib and the complex in general was in part a symbolic act designed to demoralise and cower us into inaction. Basically, the idea was to damage the one place that is most identifiable with Sikhs, in the hope that it would be a constant reminder of how they managed to violate the sanctity of the hub of our faith.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 06/11/2017 at 6:04 AM, jkvlondon said:

given that Indira had planned since 1980 to attack Harmandir Sahib , built full scale replica in Doon valley in 1981 , asked three times and got refused three times by her General to attack the Gurdwara . I think your folks are totally deluded  ask them if that is true why did her father attack in 1952  and her son in 1986 and again 1988 . that family just wanted to drive home that sikhs are ghulam nothing less and if they could they would have finished us off .

Indira gandhi was a power-hungry woman, no doubt.

Akali Sikhs were the most rebellious to central govt of India in 1977 emergency. And she put a LOT of people behind bars. And I think she just had grudge against Akalis, perhaps not Sikhs in particular. I think we tend to exaggerate the anti-sikh attitude of the then prevailing govts. 

It is possible that she attacked akal takht as a vengeance against akalis in their role in 1977 , but I think to assert that she wanted total annihilation of sikhs like aurangzeb did , is a bit far too stretched. She wouldn't have appointed Zail Singh as president then , also would have provided nothing to sikhs. 

To sum it up, I think she was a power-hungry totalitarian politician who wanted to clear anyone off her way. She hated sikhs for this I think, not because of some brahmanical agenda as is always said . 

I could be wrong though 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need to understand chanakya neeti "Saam , Daam , Dand , Bhed" of our enemies.

Saam : Praising , to win confidence of enemy

Daam : Monetary luring 

Dand : Punish the enemy

Bhed : Divide the enemy

 

How it happened with sikhs (just my gut feeling)

Saam > Praising sikhs as protectors of hindus , movies like "singh is king" , etc etc , when infact doing little to help drug ridden punjab.

Daam > Does the 350th prakash celebration of Guru Gobind Singh ji fall into this as the central GoI sponsored it by 100 crore rupees.

Dand > Op Bluestar , Delhi riots , and so on

Bhed > Taking ravidasias away from sikhi (although we too're responsible for not making sikh community a truly casteless society), Dasam granth controversies, missioniary sikhs, etc etc 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

We need to understand chanakya neeti "Saam , Daam , Dand , Bhed" of our enemies.

Saam : Praising , to win confidence of enemy

Daam : Monetary luring 

Dand : Punish the enemy

Bhed : Divide the enemy

 

How it happened with sikhs (just my gut feeling)

Saam > Praising sikhs as protectors of hindus , movies like "singh is king" , etc etc , when infact doing little to help drug ridden punjab.

Daam > Does the 350th prakash celebration of Guru Gobind Singh ji fall into this as the central GoI sponsored it by 100 crore rupees.

Dand > Op Bluestar , Delhi riots , and so on

Bhed > Taking ravidasias away from sikhi (although we too're responsible for not making sikh community a truly casteless society), Dasam granth controversies, missioniary sikhs, etc etc 

Great Analysis!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although I never understood why Indira gandhi didn't remove sardars from her security cover, despite some warnings to do the same ?

Wasn't she even least bothered that her sikh bodyguards may end up shooting her because of what she did in op.bluestar

Today , a sikh or muslim security personnel is not allowed in inner circles of PM of india, although this is not written on paper(because it would be evidence of discrimination) but its an unwritten rule I read of in a news article

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

Although I never understood why Indira gandhi didn't remove sardars from her security cover, despite some warnings to do the same ?

Wasn't she even least bothered that her sikh bodyguards may end up shooting her because of what she did in op.bluestar

Today , a sikh or muslim security personnel is not allowed in inner circles of PM of india, although this is not written on paper(because it would be evidence of discrimination) but its an unwritten rule I read of in a news article

her hubris and arrrogance made her feel invincible plus if she was killed she had already planned the next stage ...remember she was groomed by her dad for power ..and with that about how his family was done wrong by sikhs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, TejS said:

Agreed. Indira Gandhi isn’t exactly the stereotypical Brahmanical figure. She did after all marry a Parsi, and her son went onto marry an Italian. These aren’t the actions of a Brahman. And her grandson, Rahul, isn’t exactly a poster boy for Hindu nationalism. Indira Gandhi was slighted by a handful of Sikhs, and she took this personally and to break our pride launched this attack. Both sides suffered, but the price our community had to pay was far too great. And no point in blaming other communities, when our own are our worst enemies. When you have people like K.S. Brar heading attacks on their own sacred shrine, that’s when one can see that our community is spineless. When you have people like KPS Gill executing the youth of his own people, that’s when you know we’re divided. When you have our own police torturing, raping, killing our people that’s when you know that our community has no future. If we had been united back in 1984, I’m sure the outcome would have been different. But forget 1984, we’re not even united today, I’m sure what’s going on in the news is testament to that.

If there’s any Brahmanical agenda we need to worry about then the closest thing to that is the BJP. Look at what they’re up to now:

https://thewire.in/199729/dyal-singh-college-renaming-vande-mataram/

Just a digression but Dayal Singh, I believe, was an Arya-Samaji.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use