Jump to content

British Government Confirms Jagtar Singh Has Been Tortured


TheeTurbanator
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'm going to pray on it.

If civil means are going to work, I think the forum members are right, it would take coordination and commitment.

Also true, did not a Guru ride on a police station to save a hindu woman from being raped and kill them all?  Wouldn't blame anyone for that either.

My name is Akal increases willful protection and judgment through a soldier of the archangel Michael.  So Guest Singh can take his fear tactics and creepy name digging and shove it.

Try and put a sack on my head or anyone I see, it'll be the last stupid thing you do.

My personal view is that the trolls that target this forum are trying to insight speech that would maybe be used against a person, but I'm not going to live in fear of it.

Try civil means first.  I'll happily contribute to that, if we can agree on some uniform action.  If that fails, the rules are off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, MrDoaba said:

Nah Baba Ji, pakhandis like me canny be sava lakh.

The only one of those that I don't like is sitins but that's just me personally. Give me example scenarios of each, get the ball rolling here. I need to see creativity (or smoke it) before I can be creative.

Imagine a double decker bus or two completely covered in Jagtar Singh slogans/pics/posters/pre-recorded speech parked outside downing street or parliament. Driving around the major sites in Central London. I'm pretty sure that'd turn one or two heads. It's legal and doable. We may get moved on but there's nothing stopping us driving around. Just a thought. Bounce off me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, GurjantGnostic said:

I'm going to pray on it.

If civil means are going to work, I think the forum members are right, it would take coordination and commitment.

Also true, did not a Guru ride on a police station to save a hindu woman from being raped and kill them all?  Wouldn't blame anyone for that either.

And yeah f it.  My name is Joseph William Dana Mulvihill.  It means God increases willful protection and judgment through a follower of the archangel Michael.  So Guest Singh can take his fear tactics and creepy name digging and shove it.

Try and put a sack on my head or anyone I see, it'll be the last stupid thing you do.

My personal view is that the trolls that target this forum are trying to insight speech that would maybe be used against a person, but I'm not going to live in fear of it.

Try civil means first.  I'll happily contribute to that, if we can agree on some uniform action.  If that fails, the rules are off.

Top of the morning to you Joseph.

Which guru which police station where when how ??

We have tried civil means. For over 33years we've been civil. How much longer?

"Although civil disobedience is considered to be an expression of contempt for law, Martin Luther King Jr. regarded civil disobedience to be a display and practice of reverence for law."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, S4NGH said:

Imagine a double decker bus or two completely covered in Jagtar Singh slogans/pics/posters/pre-recorded speech parked outside downing street or parliament. Driving around the major sites in Central London. I'm pretty sure that'd turn one or two heads. It's legal and doable. We may get moved on but there's nothing stopping us driving around. Just a thought. Bounce off me

Sounds legit. Look how much coverage the Brexit bus got, became a celebrity! If we were to do this, I would avoid any involvement of Khalistan, just concentrate on the issue at hand. We try to do too much at once, need to be focused otherwise we won't get anywhere. The whole thing should literally be about Jaggi and his wrongful arrest, nothing else.

We need manpower to pull this off. While Downing Street and parliament sounds good, it usually fails, they don't care and won't bat an eyelid. Need to disrupt the flow, more than once. In the process we need to do the governments besti, with something not relating to Jaggi because if there is a side theme, it will add publicity - it must be something aam janta can relate to. Any ideas?

We may get moved on but we NEED to be willing to push back. Go with an anarchist mindset. And frankly a few need to be willing to get nicked.

Lets make the mo-fo's jump by being the collective thappar across their face.

We need to be on it with the media BEFORE we do it, literally have a plan on paper, well organised not jungli.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, S4NGH said:

Top of the morning to you Joseph.

Which guru which police station where when how ??

We have tried civil means. For over 33years we've been civil. How much longer?

"Although civil disobedience is considered to be an expression of contempt for law, Martin Luther King Jr. regarded civil disobedience to be a display and practice of reverence for law."

I'll do by best to find it.  I think it was something I read on sikhnet.  Stand by. sigh.  I was hoping you guys would know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, MrDoaba said:

Hypothetically we could order a bomb on the dark web maybe? It'll be like "Pow! Right in the kisser!"

 

No but seriously what did you have in mind bro?

*Cough*, let me refer you to exhibit A:

On 17/01/2018 at 3:49 PM, MrDoaba said:

Just have to be careful with your words and be vigilant. They have bigger threats than the pakhandis here.

Plus my friends in the gorment will help me out incase of any trouble.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, S4NGH said:

Nothing stupid. Within reason. I've forgotten what that protest was about when the Sikh blocked the London road? Police got heavy handed? I don't think that's a bad Idea. It definitely got the media involved. Remember, there's no such thing as bad publicity.

I was there but didn't cause a Ruckus, honest :grin

this protest for Jaggi took place in November, another one would not go amiss

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, InderjitS said:

*Cough*, let me refer you to exhibit A:

 

Hello Sir,

I was waiting for you. That comment was based on a suggestion you made via PM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If relationship with Guru is strong, then kanga is done twice a day, and turban should never be taken off or put on like a hat, there is a lot wrong with that as it is against rehit! maryada is to take off every layer of turban/pagh/dumalla individually, and tie fresh turban each time!
    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use