.

[Guest]

.

[Guest]

A wild pig.

[puzzled]

Probably still getting tortured in Narak with the same methods the mughals used on non muslims for all the murders and tortures he carried out. But obviously muslims will beleive he is in jannat because he wrote many copies of the Qur'an and demolished many Mandirs to replace them with mosques. 

[puzzled]

I wouldn't be surprised if the people killed under his raj is over a million.

[Big_Tera]

He is in a fire dungeon with the likes of 

hitler 

musolini

stalin 

and other eveil dictators. If there is a such a thing as punishment for past sins. He will be burning like the rest of them who commited atrocities. 

If not. 

Then he will just be like the rest of people that pass away. asleep and unaware of whats happening right now. 

[genie]

He is In nark, God willing, suffering untold misery.

or probably a reborn on earth as dung beetle/worm or a pig slaughtered and reborn again and again to be slaughtered again and again to pay off the karmic debts.

[TejS]

1 hour ago, genie said:

He is In nark, God willing, suffering untold misery.

or probably a reborn on earth as dung beetle/worm or a pig slaughtered and reborn again and again to be slaughtered again and again to pay off the karmic debts.

This is interesting. Being someone who has been a proponent of Darwin's evolution theory, what then would have the been the best way to attain salvation before humans evolved? Would it then be the common ancestor that we share with apes, and what about when we were just bacteria?

Or does that theory not fit with our religious system.

[genie]

8 hours ago, TejS said:

This is interesting. Being someone who has been a proponent of Darwin's evolution theory, what then would have the been the best way to attain salvation before humans evolved? Would it then be the common ancestor that we share with apes, and what about when we were just bacteria?

Or does that theory not fit with our religious system.

Darwin's evolution theory is just a theory so wouldn't add too much weight to it in terms of spiritual/theological/religious matters.

From my understanding In terms of Sikhi and other dharmic faiths that believe in karma/salvation/mukthi/nirvana then as the organism gets more complex then it reaches higher consciousness are greater chance of salvation. It is the ability to have self awareness self correction and contemplation towards the creator that sets us apart from other primates/animals and other living beings.

So for example when a lion hunts, kills and eats a buffalo or deer or when a cat eats a mouse it is doing what it is naturally programmed to do it doesnt feel no remorse or feels its doing wrong. Whereas human beings when we kill a living being the more complex that being is the more sense of wrong/sin we naturally feel. Each day we kill millions of bacteria just by breathing, by walking and doing things just to live. We also kill plants to sustain ourselves and we kill insects without a second thought if they annoy us, when we kills animals we start to feel a little guilt or remorse depending on how fond we are of that animal and the more rare and complex it is the less likely we want to harm it. It all fits in with the natural order.

And Human beings are designed be higher thinkers to think morally before they act, so when we have mass murders like kps gill, aurangzeb, hitler, indira gandhi, abdali,etc. They prove they are lowest of the low and in the natural karmic order they will be in nark (the ghoulish underworld) or reborn in a scenario on earth or other planets to suffer tortuous lives again and again.

[genie]

Also I would like to add that in terms of evolution and atheist thinking then hitler,gengis khan, indira gandhi, aurangzeb, abdali,etc didn't do nothing wrong cos evolution dictates survival of the fittest. It has no moral judgement that is the realm of religious/theological thinking, morality came from religion to form better and ordered more humane societies. The only correct outcome for evolution theory and ideology is that the strongest and fittest species survives and if that means total extermination of a race/ethnicity/religious group etc then so be it because it was not fit enough to evolve to form a better defense or counter attack strategy to survive.

In Sikhi for Sikhs to have survived in past history where they were mostly pacifists they had to militerise and become militant in order to survive in hostile islamic invaders and hindu hill raja forces.

And even today we are witnessing a sort of social evolution in action in our community in a present times where indian/punjabi Sikh females are taught by atheist zealots in media/education/society that you can be with non-sikhs it doesn't matter. Then Sikhs will have to evolve their thinking to combat the threat to their survival of their unique community by either converting more non-sikh females to sikhi and breed with them to produce more sikh kids or produce an ultra Sikh nationalist mindset amoung the Sikh females to detest any kind of relationship with non-sikh males as was the case before the atheist bankster funded feminist / atheist revolution of the 1950s.

 

[Ranjeet01]

Can someone please explain to me, some people say that you reap what you sow in your lifetime.

Do we actually atone for our sins in this life only? 

But Aurangzeb lived up to a ripe old age of 93. He never reaped what he had sown.

It is said what goes around comes around but not for this person.