Why aren't British Sikhs as active/engaged as their Canadian counterparts in politics?

[TejS 1,067]

18 hours ago, YOYO29 said:

As far throwing stones well it was your lot started categorizing Muslim pecking order. I merely responded with the same tongue. 

And did that hurt your feelings lol? Our discussion was relevant to what we were discussing, your post just sounds like you're butthurt. We don't need you to come on here and state the obvious for us every time we talk about Muslims. 

[TejS 1,067]

16 hours ago, YOYO29 said:

With or without rawalpindi riots east punjab muslims were destined to be doomed.

So maybe Punjabi Muslims shouldn't have claimed land which was as equal to Sikhs/Hindus as "Muslim land" in the first place. Do you people know how logic works?

[GareebSikh1699 100]

9 hours ago, YOYO29 said:

sikh and hindu land lords who have grabbed the land during ranjit sing's and British times at the expanse of Muslims.This land could have been given to the tenants. All it required was legislation by newly parliament.There was no need for all the bloodshed.

LoL nice try YoYo but what you are let down by is a lack of truth.

There were hardly any Hindu land lords in Punjab as the majority 72% of the farmlands in present day West Punjab and present day east Punjab were held by Muslim Punjabi's.

Muslim Jats, Muslim Rajputs, Muslim Saini's (Arains in Pakistan), Muslim Kamboh's (Arains or Kamboh's in Pakistan), Muslim Gujjars as well as Pathans, Awans (Kiyani Rajputs), Syeds (Qureshi's), Mughals, Baloch's along with Muslim Brahmins (Butts and Hussaini's), Sheikhs (Muslim Khatri's) etc, etc have always held their own land as opposed to being tenants.

This is why so-called higher caste Muslims always referred to Sikhs as a "chooreh-chamaarah di Qaum" when Giani Ditt Singh Ji would expose the discrimination within the Quran and defeat the Muslims in debates - as Sikhi is THE religion for the oppressed to shelter within.

8 hours ago, proactive said:

Apart from Lyallpur and Montgomery districts where the land had been allocated to ex-soldiers by the British,  the lands that the Sikhs held were their own ancestral lands. It seems that you cannot handle the fact that Sikhs owned 27.7% of the land while only being 14% of the Punjab population. This is because Sikhism held a great attraction to the farming castes such as Jat, Kamboh, Saini etc. 

Furthermore, most Jats happen to be Muslims and every one is aware of famous Pakistani Jats like Prime Ministers and leaders of the Muslim League like Liaquat Ali Khan and Chaudhury Muhammad Zafarullah Khan and Chaudhury Naseer Ahmed Malhi. 

And in the case of Saini's and Kamboh's (who are known as Arains in Pakistan) again it is only a small minority of them who are even Sikh with the Muslim ones far more powerful politically as we see in the case of General Zia (Arain caste). Brahmin Muslims have only come to political prominence recently with the Sharif family. No wonder most lower caste Muslims turned to Christianity with the so-called higher caste Muslims often preventing their entry into Mosques.