Legally Desi Horrible insult to sikhs

[ms514]

Sat Sri Akal:

How about this..someone find out who makes that movie, see if they have a website with an e-mail address/contact information, and then let the moviemakers know your views (politely please).

Blaming Hindus/Muslims/Non-Sikhs ain't going to help any cause. But protesting directly to the movie makers will and can certainly extract an apology from them...provided there is persistence behind the initiative.

[Gurpreet Singh]

The Movie's Website

[Harmeet Singh]

Waheguru ji ka khalsa

Waheguru ji ki fateh

I belive it is time to take some stand and take the movie off the screen.

www.legallydesifilm.com

Jackokingdom Productions, Inc.

(847) 372-4800 | (630) 712-7208

Call them up or write them

[Gurpreet Singh]

edited: erm Gurpreet Singh ji, i think that these people who made that film were most likly moonas who consider themselves sikhs (hmm, a sikh and a moona who eats meat and drinks? yes, very sikhified not, i am being sarcastic)

I know that veer...i was just saying that its not a positive image they are putting out...cuz if someone doesn't know who a sikh is....movies like that would just make them think that oh those guys grow their hair and drink and eat meat.....but its all cool...they just different cuz they grow their hair??....i dunno if i make sense...but thats what i meant...

[S1ngh]

All these new "abc" company productions are the braches of Bollywood junk trash. Pictures like "hollywood bollywood" are of course made totally out of india with american based indian company.. But at the end they are offshoot braches of bollywood.. Anyway.. talking about bolly trash low status films is waste of my time.. pls excuse me from this thread :wub:

I sure will call them up and will leave them good voicemail message :e:

[buddasingh]

Here is something that may be helpful to people when they make comparisons about groups being discriminated against. The same action directed toward two different groups could have completely different discriminatory effect. Thus discrimination has to be judged by its effect in addition to the action.

For example saying that men are stupid has very little discriminatory effect because there is no context or history of such discrimination. If one were to say something deragotory about women however, it would be completely out of line because of the reality faced by women and the meaning of the comments would carry a completely different tone because of what women have had to deal with historically.

Likewise one should not compare Christian mockeries or realities to mocking the Sikhs. There is historical and stereotypical mocking of this minority. Regardless of what one might suggest reality is, it is wrong and insulting and deserves to be described as HATRED AND RACIST, even if it arises from the short sighted STUPIDITY of the makers.