Jump to content

Why don't Sikh brides cover their heads?


puzzled
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

my Masi's girl was pretty simple tastes like myself but when her folks saw that suit she picked the night before they took her out to get heaviest lengha possible , we are talking five foot 4  barely 100 pounds girls carrying 30 pounds of material . Her bros literally had to help her move around to do lavan and her masian bhabi help her stand and sit .... madness

It's the lining in those lenghe lol.

2 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

plus it signifies she's under the protection of both families and their honour...which is one of those sikh traditions which match to sikhiya of Guru ji

This is actually quite touching ngl. You said one from saure and one from naanke though...did you mean from daadke and naake? If not please explain.

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, MrDoaba said:

It's the lining in those lenghe lol.

This is actually quite touching ngl. You said one from saure and one from naanke though...did you mean from daadke and naake? If not please explain.

Thanks.

when the chunni rasam is done that chunni given by Saure is used under the nanake one as traditionally the nanake of the girl buy the ananda da suit.

Also it can be seen as a double hand of blessing on the head of the bride

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

when the chunni rasam is done that chunni given by Saure is used under the nanake one as traditionally the nanake of the girl buy the ananda da suit.

I was not aware of this...I haven't seen any girls wear the one from the Chunni rasam at the actual vivaah. Is this whats making a comeback then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MrDoaba said:

I was not aware of this...I haven't seen any girls wear the one from the Chunni rasam at the actual vivaah. Is this whats making a comeback then?

I don't know if it ever went away in my family because they stuck to sikh traditions . Because everything is so bling bling now the chunni given now by most saure would probably be super heavily embroidered (status) so stitching two heavy heavy chunnis would make zero sense (think clash of material of top chunni with jewells gota etc etc larlam parlam on saure chunni) . Traditionally the chunni put by saure is simple flattish embroidery possibly gold thread , a little edging , even just a pretty simple phulkari (mine was light pink with gold thread).

Now the whole dress up like a bollywood star thing is so prevalent people don't even think of the meaning of anything , let alone the deep sentiments behind them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

I don't know if it ever went away in my family because they stuck to sikh traditions . Because everything is so bling bling now the chunni given now by most saure would probably be super heavily embroidered (status) so stitching two heavy heavy chunnis would make zero sense (think clash of material of top chunni with jewells gota etc etc larlam parlam on saure chunni) . Traditionally the chunni put by saure is simple flattish embroidery possibly gold thread , a little edging , even just a pretty simple phulkari (mine was light pink with gold thread).

Now the whole dress up like a bollywood star thing is so prevalent people don't even think of the meaning of anything , let alone the deep sentiments behind them.

I see. I will ask some ladies about this. My sisters and most of my cosuin sisters had very light chunnis like the ones you describe but I still do not recall them wearing it on the actual wedding day; could this perhaps be a regional tradition? 

I also get the sense that a lot of Gursikhs are moving away from many of these old tradtions whether Punjabi or Sikh ones even if they are do not contradict Sikhi because of the usual rhetoric i.e. ritualism, manmat, false information, or simply deemed unnecessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

it's not impossible to do just akkl nu hath maar :

d9db16c8f5bcef5e25d9905f4966b646.jpg
323eda9bd707ff7d4d09182643f9797b.jpg

 

If you can't manage your heavy chunni get mum on the job or your masian :
6db25258613480dd5308b31cb29bacbe.jpg
or if you are totally paranoid about doing beabhi:

d57c9233e30607c0bf58ef722eb991ad.jpg

 

yes now that's a head covering. But that veil just looks stupid!  why would you veil yourself before guru ji. just another paki inspired fashion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use