Jump to content

Sikhi and LGBTQ+ ...


Kau89r8
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, puzzled said:

Gay is not natural *edited*. 

If gay attraction is normal then what about pedophile attraction? 

What if a 13 yr old gay boy and 58 yr old gay man turn up at the gurdwara saying they want Anand karaj? 

What if a gay turns up with a tranny half woman/man  saying they want anand karaj?

Where you gnna draw the line.

There are blokes out there with female genitals, and females with male genitals and breast at the same time. what if something like that turns up asking for anand karaj. 

None of this bs is allowed. 

 

Gay and pedo aren't the same or synonymous. It happens in maya. It's has no place within Rehit or a Gurmat Gursikh lifestyle. 

It is natural actually. Straight people have always given birth to gay people according to hukam and will continue to. 

Anand Karaj and a lifestyle free of kaam is the only thing Sikhi promotes. 

Sikhi also promotes celibate life which is open to us all until, and then only if, we enter into Anand Karaj. 

So really we all, gay and straight alike, have at least 95 percent the same mission of be celibate in Mind and deed both, and not sexually fantasize about anyone and rid ourselves of kaam. 

The Sikh panth doesn't need to be anti alphabet just stay focused on what it's always been. 

A Sikh trying to openly have homosexual sex is the same as one drinking openly or or sleeping with the neighbors wife. It's not Gurmat is all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, ipledgeblue said:

I am sure when sikhs and other people used to get married young, ie their teens -  then their kaam didn't get to levels where they needed to "EXPLORE" their sexuality that is now in the media to the this gay culture. You got married and saw your partner for the 1st time when you were going to start your marital partnership, you didn't have a choice of what they looked like - but at the same time you were young and still growing mature so were able to adapt. It was not really anything to do with heterosexuality or homosexuality, it was more to do with having a grihast jeevan and following the dharam of family life.

 

Now heterosexuals are also diseased in the mind not just homosexuals, the ages we are getting married at are causing us to become slaves of 5 vikaar including LUST and EGO. We bring so much lust and ego into choosing marital partners now, oh and a lot of people are bringing GREED into choosing marital partners as well.

Amen veer ji. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, puzzled said:

Just watched these   and its horrific! Lost for words    the singh in the first video with the pink pagh! 

Just showed it to my mum and sister and sister was like they should be killed! ?    and my mum agreed and she said she would shoot them!   

Even I wouldn't go that far!

They should simply be disowned and told to get out of the community. 

I'm glad you wouldn't kill.someone for being gay or say that you would. But that's half the reason the pride movement exists..to stop violence against gay people...I grew up in a time and place where "queer stomping" and "killing faggots" is real bro. 

They should be treated the same as anyone else who commits kurehit. If we threw out all the kurehit who'd be left? Strengthening Rehit period is important and so much bigger than gay. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kau89r8 said:

The second video, Barack Obama posted about that Singh with rainbow turban on twitter...something along line 'im very proud of you for your bravery along those lines'............ and i remember Obama refused to go Darbar Sahib, he didnt want to be see with 'turbans' could be mistaken for muslims etc yet years later hes able to post Singh pic!! 

Sikh need to decide what is a sikh and what is not. we obviously know what a sikh is but today any gandu, kusra, kanjri, s1ut, hoe, smoker can call themselves a sikh    this is not right      such people would of not been considered sikhs       even people who cut their hair wouldnt of been considered sikhs.     the definition of a sikh is now so blurred that any1 can be a sikh regardless of lifestyle and belief  and with this blurred definition of a sikh the shamelessness and bezti is growing as well and its not right or fair for the rest of us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

Gay and pedo aren't the same or synonymous.

gay is a sexual attraction and so is pedophile  they are both sexual attractions.  gay sex is not natural or productive. anus is not for sex but to sh1t through    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

It's happening, bro. I saw a video on YouTube a few days ago where these Zoophiles were defending their attraction to kutteh and biliyan using the false equivalency of human interactions in terms of body language, etc. I had a headache after hearing some of the bukwaas being discussed. Nastiness.

whats the video called! ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, puzzled said:

gay is a sexual attraction and so is pedophile  they are both sexual attractions.  gay sex is not natural or productive. anus is not for sex but to sh1t through    

Nobody said anything about what is or isn't for sex bro. Straight people do that too by the way. 

Sexual attraction period isn't Gurmat. 

Neither is talking about murdering people for their choices or nature. I suffer at krodh's hand plenty myself bro. 

Kaam is kaam bro. When you or I fantasize about our sister that's the same really. 

Equating consensual kaam to child rape is ridiculous bro. 

Keeping Rehit solves all these problems. Solves lust period. Solves murderous speech, pride, envy, hate, ego. By focusing on Rehit we don't have to get tired being anti anyone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use