British role in the 1984 genocide

[JSinghnz]

The British Government Was Behind Sikh Genocide and Plans To Attack Sri Harmandir Sahib (Golden Temple) in 1984

When Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi ordered the army to commit Sikh Genocide in Amritsar in June 1984, it was the first part of a phased plan to exterminate Sikhs in India.

The assault on Sikhism's most holiest site, involving tanks and helicopters, was timed to coincide with a religious gathering to inflict maximum killings of visiting Sikh pilgrims.

250,000 Indian soldiers locked down Punjab and slaughtered Sikh men, women and children without discrimination.

In 2014 Top Secret UK government (Whitehall) correspondence revealed that British special forces advised Indian leaders on how to attack Amritsar, despite acknowledging privately that "an operation by the Indian authorities at the Golden Temple could, in the first instance, exacerbate the communal violence in the Punjab".

http://www.discoversikhism.com/sikh_genocide/uk_betrayal_in_1984.html

[imhosingh]

Whats new? the same british forces trained up ISIS (ahem 'the rebels' until they turn on their masters and then they become 'terrorists) in Syria and Iraq. They trained the Taliban in the Soviet days...

The UK is selling weapons that are killing Yemeni's at the moment via the Saudi's military ops.

I knew Indian Military folks and they'd come to the UK to train all the time (mainly airforce) in the 80s/90s. The army types went to places like Sandhurst.

 

 

[GurjantGnostic]

1 hour ago, imhosingh said:

Whats new? the same british forces trained up ISIS (ahem 'the rebels' until they turn on their masters and then they become 'terrorists) in Syria and Iraq. They trained the Taliban in the Soviet days...

The UK is selling weapons that are killing Yemeni's at the moment via the Saudi's military ops.

I knew Indian Military folks and they'd come to the UK to train all the time (mainly airforce) in the 80s/90s. The army types went to places like Sandhurst.

 

 

Isis and it's precursors have always been western funded and trained pawns. 

Once they transitioned to the blacked out terrorists we came to know, they were still clearly multinatuonally funded, and somebody's pawn, but was it the west still?

Or russia, turkey, china and iran backing them?.

Regardless of who they were, they were not at all who they said they were. They swept up arabs into their ranks sure, but I had access to direct front line intel saying that a ptedominant number of forces encountered were not arab or muslim per se but eastern european slavic mercenaries and the like. 

Isis was somebody's army. Israel? Saudi? The euro israel usa imperial conglomerate?

[dallysingh101]

51 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

Once they transitioned to the blacked out terrorists we came to know, they were still clearly multinatuonally funded, and somebody's pawn, but was it the west still?

Or russia, turkey, china and iran backing them?.

I think saudis are probably heavily involved. Plus they can spare the funds from all the oil.   

As for eastern europeans being heavily involved, sounds suspiciously russian?