Budha Dal is Panjva Takht!

[shastarSingh]

Guru Sahib wants Degh and Tegh to be implemented everywhere.

How can we implement Degh and Tegh without a movable Takht?

[shastarSingh]

Dallysingh veerji

Plz give ur opinion.

[dallysingh101]

1 hour ago, shastarSingh said:

Dallysingh veerji

Plz give ur opinion.

I agree, but the problem is that we've only been putting out degh so far, no tegh i.e. langars, which is important but incomplete.

Also tegh in modern context will involve modern shasters/ashters. I don't know if you've been watching the war footage clips HSD has been posting on SA, but that's what yudh looks like in these times.  

[SikhKosh]

Historically the nomenclature 'Takht' was probably not there in early Sikh history. Even the Akaal Takht was known as the Akaal Bunga until recently.  If you believe otherwise, name me the earliest sources that mention the 'Akaal Takht' or the '5' Takhts ?

(So to answer your question: Buddha Dal is no takht.)

[shastarSingh]

1 hour ago, SikhKosh said:

Historically the nomenclature 'Takht' was probably not there in early Sikh history. Even the Akaal Takht was known as the Akaal Bunga until recently.  If you believe otherwise, name me the earliest sources that mention the 'Akaal Takht' or the '5' Takhts ?

(So to answer your question: Buddha Dal is no takht.)

Didn't Guru Hargobind Sahib ji make Akaal Takht higher than Delhi Takht ?

It was a political throne and not just a bunga.

[SikhKosh]

Show me historical source which says 'Akaal Takht'. It was higher than Delhi Takht but was not known with the Takht terminology as such. Nor were there four other Takhts during the times of the Gurus or shortly afterwards.