Jump to content

Nanak Naam Chardi Kala Tere Bhane Sarbat da Bhala


Recommended Posts

On 8/22/2022 at 1:44 PM, GurjantGnostic said:

What would their motive be? It looks inoffensive and cohesive with Gurmat if I'm reading it right. 

Do you know that British government even declared nihang as criminals ? They wanted to tame Sikhs do that they won't challenge their rule and by promoting passimism in the panth can be helpful for them. These were the sane guys who changed our musical instruments . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, AsilentUser said:

Do ypu know that British government even declared nihang as criminals ? They wanted to tame Sikhs do that they won't challenge their rule and by promoting passimism in the panth can be helpful for them. These were the sane guys who changed our musical instruments . 

I did know, and agree with all those points. 

What I'm saying is based on Gurbani alone, in what way is the line incongruent, offensive, or serve the above purpose?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They disarmed us, changed our idea of Saroop, wasp colonolialized our minds, spread false narratives about Parchar and Sukh Maryada as well. 

I'd say they're very active from that time until now in trying to supress and subvert the Sikh image and ideology. 

And if we aren't careful those wasp cultist Sikhs in london are going to do to Sikhi what rome did to christianity. 

I've looked for alteration or meddling influence in Gurbani very attentively, and every time I thought I maybe found something the Gurbani checked out and my paradigm was shifted or shattered. That appears to be Shud. 

Although the british have Sakhian we don't. 

Also oxford is churning out a rediculous amount of fake information on Sikhi in conjunction with their wasp cult of Sikhi. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, BhForce said:

The point of "Sikh studies" is not to push the Sikh point of view. (Black studies or women studies do push those points of view).

The point of "Sikh studies" is to denigrate the Sikhs and their Gurus. It's to "explain" Guru Nanak ji as some kind of weird itinerant preacher who got the idea from random Sadhus and Muslim peers, and was not divine -- WH McLeod.

Any "Sikh" who allies with "Sikh studies" is a useful <banned word filter activated>, a sell-out prostitute, a coward, evil, or all four.

111 percent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use