Jump to content

Film Called Guru Gobind Singh


Akali
 Share

Recommended Posts

GuruFateh!

I have just come across a film called 'Guru Gobind Singh' and has the following actors: Kulbushan KharbandaSonu Walia Girja Shanker. I was wondering whether or not this is an informative film the way 'Khalsa' by Manghal Singh Dhillon was.

Appreciate the views of the Sangat on this one.

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa, Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GuruFateh!

I have just come across a film called 'Guru Gobind Singh' and has the following actors: Kulbushan KharbandaSonu Walia Girja Shanker. I was wondering whether or not this is an informative film the way 'Khalsa' by Manghal Singh Dhillon was.

Appreciate the views of the Sangat on this one.

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa, Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh!

122114[/snapback]

FATEH veerji

its more lyk a movie than a documentantary but obivously nuttings made up in it

i fink its worth seeing... i luvd it

FATEH ji

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wasnt there another film of guru gobind singh ji which was aimed at doing mass parchaar, yet it was banned as a human took the role of guru ji?

i was curious though, we can never ever ever compare ourself to guru ji himself...so if the film was designed to do parchar, why did we get angry over it? i mean look at how people understood the mahabharat and ramayana, both avtaars in the passed ages, but that lead to people world-wide wanting to know hinduism.

would there have been the same affect if the guru gobind singh ji film was made and distributed?

gustaphi maaf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kanwadeep Singh Atwal. What language do you use to post your views on this forum?

I find it very difficult to decipher. It is not Punjabi and certainly not English. Please take heed and improve your ability to communicate properly, otherwise no one will take you seriously.

Apologies for any offence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kanwadeep Singh Atwal. What language do you use to post your views on this forum?

I find it very difficult to decipher.  It is not Punjabi and certainly not English.  Please take heed and improve your ability to communicate properly, otherwise no one will take you seriously.

Apologies for any offence.

122146[/snapback]

I'm sorry. Yeah I understand, its just I chat on MSN all the time.. haha so you know i got used to it. blush.gif Thank you for pointing it out, I'll try to improve in the future :TH:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wasnt there another film of guru gobind singh ji which was aimed at doing mass parchaar, yet it was banned as a human took the role of guru ji?

i was curious though, we can never ever ever compare ourself to guru ji himself...so if the film was designed to do parchar, why did we get angry over it? i mean look at how people understood the mahabharat and ramayana, both avtaars in the passed ages, but that lead to people world-wide wanting to know hinduism.

would there have been the same affect if the guru gobind singh ji film was made and distributed?

gustaphi maaf

122145[/snapback]

yes people know of hinduism but there is no mad rush to convert to hinduism...there has never been an actor playing Mohammad and islam is the fastest growing religion in the world....no point in going against sikhi to teach a few people...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use