Jump to content

AKJ OR SIKH sangat?


Guest learner singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 28
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Little history for those who don't know : Sikhsangat.com waz first started by daljeet (TO), amardeep (UK) and me (CAL) .. and none of us were amritdhari by that time (still waitin for amar :) to take khalsa flight) and neither we had much knowledge about dozens of A-Z jathas.. (certainly not me).. So at the end it's a neutral place for anyone :(

SIkh = Sikh

There is no A sikh, B sikh or Z Sikh.. (It's boundry created by our mind and i think we should think outside of box :@

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sat Sri Akal:

Sorry Singh Sahib, if you poll the forum, you'll find out that the majority of people here do not claim "AKJ membership".

ADMIN NOTE: Sadh Sangat Jee, we humbly request that you close this topic of conversation. The Singhs and Kaurs in Akhand Kirtani Jatha *are* Sikh sangat, and so are other Sikhs. We are on the borderline of another stereotyping, hate-mongering, anti-jatha argument. We are sorry for being so defensive about this, but Panthic Ektha is PRIORITY NUMBER *ONE*.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

vwihgurU jI kw Kwlsw!

vwihgurU jI kI &iqh!!

I dont know about anyone else here, but i aint part of AKJ, Nihang or Taksal, im part of the Khalsa Panth, if people wanna say "im AKJ", "im a Taksali", "im a Nihang" and forget about being a united khalsa which is not segregated then thats up to them. When Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharaj created the Khalsa Panth to create unity and abolish any caste ties, why have we started putting ourselfs into jathebandi/samparda boxes? :)

im a Sikh of Sri Guru Nanak Sahib Ji Maharaj thats it, not akj, not taksal, not nihang

Gurfateh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gur Fateh!

Gurbar Akaaal, I note your comments and whilst agreeing in principle for unity as per the message of Gurdev Pita, I don't believe that means everyone is the same and identical.

"Unity through diversity" is what I believe Guru Ji wanted, for the entire world and for the Sikhs -one can see this if one compares the accounts of Bhai Daya Singh, Bhai Nand Lal, Bhai Khanyia Singh and Banda Singh Bahadur -all Sikhs, but not necessarily Amritdhari or identical in rehit...

...I do not wish to have this discussion fall into an argument on jathas or jathabandis or sampardya, but I personally feel people's realtionship with Maharaj cannot be identical...

...the contrast to this is Unity in the form of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi's where everyone dresses, looks, thinks, believes and behaves the same way...consider this carefully (and the youth camps, ladies camps and speeches of the Nazis) and compare to the thoughts and events organised by many who claim to be propagating Sikhi today and you'll find a nasty taste in your mouth...

Please forgive any foolish statements in the foregoing

-I remain the Charandhoor of the Sadh Sangat-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gur Fateh!

Gurbar Akaaal, I note your comments and whilst agreeing in principle for unity as per the message of Gurdev Pita, I don't believe that means everyone is the same and identical.

"Unity through diversity" is what I believe Guru Ji wanted, for the entire world and for the Sikhs -one can see this if one compares the accounts of Bhai Daya Singh, Bhai Nand Lal, Bhai Khanyia Singh and Banda Singh Bahadur -all Sikhs, but not necessarily Amritdhari or identical in rehit...

...I do not wish to have this discussion fall into an argument on jathas or jathabandis or sampardya, but I personally feel people's realtionship with Maharaj cannot be identical...

...the contrast to this is Unity in the form of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi's where everyone dresses, looks, thinks, believes and behaves the same way...consider this carefully (and the youth camps, ladies camps and speeches of the Nazis) and compare to the thoughts and events organised by many who claim to be propagating Sikhi today and you'll find a nasty taste in your mouth...

Please forgive any foolish statements in the foregoing

-I remain the Charandhoor of the Sadh Sangat-

Gur Fateh,

"...I do not wish to have this discussion fall into an argument on jathas or jathabandis or sampardya, but I personally feel people's realtionship with Maha

raj cannot be identical..."

Just to clarify, I simply which to state here that one's relationship with Maharaj is exactly that their own...as Sadh Sangat we simply come together to support each other and share the collective experience...Maharaj is so vast that experience of Akaal is equally vast and diverse...as therefore are the methods and means to do so...

[Personally, for me, Khalsa Singhs have a quickest route, but this is for me...by Kirpa and Karam...another may, by the same 2 factors be more suited to a Ba'hai, Mahayana Buddhist, Shia Islamic, Udasi Sadhu or Greek Christian lifetsyle...this is all forms of Maharaj's play...**Manas Ki Jaat ko, Ekeh pachaan bo**...**Kudrat da khel rachaiya...**]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use