Jump to content

Gay Sikh Person


serenity
 Share

Recommended Posts

scenario: a man and wife have sex but neither enjoy it.....hang on its not possible for a man not to enjoy it, he has to o.r.g.a.s.m. to let out the stuff.

so in other words, lets let women have to endure lovingless and awful sex, but the man can have quick and lovingless sex.

hmmm, maybe people say this because they are too scared to get good at making love. What is to stop the woman at the end of this awful sex fantasising about other men who might give her what her husband could not?

whats to stop her feeling lust cus she being let down?

?? I'm not sure what compelled you to write this as per the posts before you :@

It sounds like you have some sort of personal agenda against 'men', I'm a woman too and perhaps not all woman feel this way..

Scared to get good at making love??? I'm very confused, first why would one feel scared and second shouldn't we be thinking of other things we need to get good at??

'Stop the woman at the end of this awful sex' What awful sex? and in whose eyes?? This sounds like lust to me..and lust is not something we should measure as enjoyable or not..lust is lust..and lust is something we should always try

to diminish.

So you're saying that woman fantasise about other men because their man doesn't give her what 'she needs'??? She feels lust because she has sexu-al expectations that were 'let down'???

All I can say is...buksh lo...you shouldn't be fantasising about men PERIOD because ALL (sikh or not) are brothers/father figures, the only man a woman should ever think about and have any sort of relationship with is of course her Husband.

Being let down?? Again..there are more important things in life than sex-ual needs, expectations and wants...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 106
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

< admin cut - Congratulations Gabroo Khalistan Dah, I will requesting the Admins to ban you permanently. Please come back with a new id and a new attitude. Guru jee dee kirpaa naal you will learn the meaning of "naa ko bairee nahee baegaanaa sagal sang ham ko ban aaee" and even if you don't agree with gay lifestyle - which is fine because it is in fact against Sikh tenets - you should not go against gay people - who are biologically prone to feel lust for their same gender. Lust is a problem that needs to be fixed, but you have no right to continually bash these people. YOu have no right to say the things about them you have said in this post. For this reason I am making my request today that you be banned. Please, if you do get a new account, try to remember this what I have told you today. >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waheguroo..I agree, perhaps here comments are not gurmat, but IT IS NOT Gurmat to attack others like this Veerji..why do we have to bring lalleshvari into everything?? if we keep doing that we've already lost the 'battle'...

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

Bhainji

This 'serenity' person is Lallesvari. His usernames are always female for some psychological reason. and is in his element when it comes to s.e.x discussion. Serenity has the same writing style. He's just come fresh from having his butt kicked by princess sonia on sikhawareness :@

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use