Khalistan Question

[Guest Narinder Singh]

in india a sikh is free to wear a kirpan in domestic airlines ... in uk not ... where a sikh is gulam ???? uk or india

:lol: Gandhi ji gave you this right just yesterday, and sikhi was founded on that very land in which you're fighting for your rights. Shaaabaassh!

Sikhs are gulam in the very country they liberated.

Fateh.

[TheVampire]

As maj of Panjabi's do not want Khalistan.

Khalistan would need to reject democracy.

If you want a majority Khalsa in Khalistan, it needs to become smaller than Panjab.

Maybe khalsa should concentracte in and around a few towns in order to be a majority and then declare Khalistan for that locality.

I know Sikhs have grievances but imho Khalistan is not the solution.

Fateh

[Guest Narinder Singh]

As maj of Panjabi's do not want Khalistan.

Khalistan would need to reject democracy.

If you want a majority Khalsa in Khalistan, it needs to become smaller than Panjab.

Maybe khalsa should concentracte in and around a few towns in order to be a majority and then declare Khalistan for that locality.

I know Sikhs have grievances but imho Khalistan is not the solution.

Fateh

Sikhs made up less than 3% of Punjabs population when Baba Banda Singh Ji Bahadur established the first Sikh raj, and Sikhs made up less than 10% of Punjabs population when Maharaja Ranjit Singh re-established Sikh raj (and according to you they were both wrong in doing so).

Oh, and just one more little fact, Sikhs make up more than 60% of the population in todays Punjab, and todays Punjab is A LOT smaller than the Punjab of Banda Singh Bahadur and Maharaj Ranjit Singh. Doesnt that give Sikhs even more of a right to have their own nation??? DUH!

To sum things up, when we rely on facts rather than assumptions, our perception of things are more realistic, so i would urge you to rely on facts.

So Guru Gobind Singh Ji never sent Baba Banda Singh Bahadur to Punjab to establish SIKH RAJ huh?

Guru Tegh Bahadur Ji didn't find and establish the land of Anandpur Sahib right?

And the Nishan Sahib (sikh flag) is a showpiece, as well as the five Takhts (sovereign sikh thrones) are simply a beautiful display of architecture, nothing more right?

Read your history,

Fateh.

And you have yet to answer the questions above, so dont run, have fun! (trying to answer these questions) :lol:

Fateh.

[chatanga]

i am not even in favour of a Khalistan. The Gurus never created a state of their own, so why should we.... Sikhism is a dharm above national borders and nationalism.

So Baba Banda Singh, the misls after him including baba Deep Singh, Nawab Kapur Singh, Maharaja Ranjit Singh and all othe Sikh kings went against gurmat by creating their own raaj?

Having Raaj is not against Gurmat. In these days its even more essential especailly if you live under ravan raaj , like in india.

India is the mother that kills its children.

India is the snake that eats its offspring.

chatanga

[Guest Narinder Singh]

India is the mother that kills its children.

India is the snake that eats its offspring.

[Guest militant singh]

in india a sikh is free to wear a kirpan in domestic airlines ... in uk not ... where a sikh is gulam ???? uk or india

mate cnt u eva stop chatin crap or u had 2 mch bhang or sumink? u jus a nang yeah and mst nangs are anti kkhalistan

we will get khalistan no matter what - u mus be blind mate - callin sikhs free in India BLIND

[Guest militant singh]

India is the mother that kills its children.

India is the snake that eats its offspring.

Naridner Singh,can u get in2 da heads of dese people dat KHALISTAN WAS DECLARED IN 1986 4RM AKAL THAKT AND THTS OUR AIM ,NO MATTER WHAT,WHY DON;T THEY GET THAT??

[mann_kaum_layee_qurbaan]

sikhs in india are free ... get a poll in punjab even 5 % will not support khalistan ... only NRI sikhs support khalistan who will not live in sikh state of future but in uk or canada ... let them live in their dreams ....

The irony....

"In a free country there is much clamor, with little suffering; in a despotic state there is little complaint, with much grievance."

Carnot

[lsingh]

You just have to see how free India is with the DSS episode recently. The Dera chief is free and supported by both the Congress and BJP while Sikh leaders have been imprisoned on sedition charges for a peaceful protest againts butcher chief minister Beant Singh.

India is the only country in the world that has killed so many of its citizens with it own forces including Kashmir, Assam, the North east states and Dalits.

I have not seen this in Europe , Canada, USA.

If the Sikh leaders who spoke of khalistan were not arrested every time they made a statement and there was a free media that put forward the Sikh case (DSS Indian media bias) and the central government did not interfer in Punjab, the majority would vote for Khalistan.

[TheVampire]

Further to the point that the majority of Punjab population do not want Khalistan.

---- The most prominent Sikh political party, the Akali's, won the last election with the help of the Hindu BJP. So Sikhs teamed up with right wing Hindus and the Punjab population voted for them.

--- In the previous election, who won in Punjab? The Congress party.

The very party that was responsible for the attack on Harimandir Sahib and the massacres in Delhi. Yet the Punjab population put them in power in Punjab.

Vaheguru Vaheguru