Jump to content

Status of kirpan in sikhi


Recommended Posts

I was reading a text abt guru gobind singh ji banis.I was reading the translation.I came across a thing in ARDASS which I never thought about earlier. I listened ardass since my childhood but never noticed this thing.In the very first line we say:

'Prithm bhaugauti simar ke guru nanak layee dhiayee' (please excuze me for my transliteration)

here 'bhaugauti' is kirpan....i.e. we have to worship kirpan before we 'dhiayee' on Guru Nanak Dev ji.

I am confused here.Guru ji equated kirpan with Durga and bhaugauti.Guru ji can NEVER worship Durga as a deity ,as Guru ji is at MUCH MUCH higher level than Durga or bhaugauti.

My question now is why did guru ji tell us to worship Kirpan before guru Nanak and other gurus.Where does kirpan stands if we look at eternal God and gurus.

I dont know whether I make sense or not, but this just came to my mind.

I am sorry if I offended anybdy but I dont know a better place to ask this kinda confusing things.

Thnx in advance.

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

Bhaugauti does actually refer to a kirpan, because the kirpan it is the creator.

The importance of the why we should 'dhiayee' on the bhaugauti is because the of the power that comes from the sword. The sword has the power to create and destroy uphold righteaousness etc.

Bhul Chuk Maaf!

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for ur input.

There are 2 views, some people say Bhaugauti is sword and other saying Bhaugauti is God.The translation I m refering to is from renowned author Macauliff.he translated it as:

"Having first remembered the SWORD, meditate on Guru Nanak."

I have seen few other instances in guru ji's bani where he mentioned Bhaugauti and sword in same context.Like he said in 'Bhaugauti ki vaar':

"Lai Bhaugauti durg shah". Which means "durga took up the sword" where Bhaugauti=Sword( I also took this thing frm Macauliff book, which is considered as authority in Sikh History).

Guru ji called Sword by Bhaugauti 4-5 times in his bani (as far as I read).

There is one other instance in SGGS:

"Bhaugauti mudra man mohiya maya"

Which means "man wears God's mark(like Hindu tilak or Sikh religious marks or any other religious symbols) but his mind is in maya"

Here Bhaugauti means God.

Guru Gobind Singh ji used Bhaugauti as sword so many times like:

"nam Bhaugauti loh gharaya"

which means: Man has fashioned the sword with iron.

So I was just curious what does he meant in ARDAAS.

Bhul Chuk Maff.

Thnx again for ur views.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use