Jump to content

Muslim Scholar Claims Guru Nanak Dev Ji Never Visited Mecca


Recommended Posts

And also did anyone notice how he was insulting Baba Sheikh Fareed? I found that pretty offensive as well.

Bhagat ji was Sufi, the speaker is Sunni. Sunnis despise Sufis as kuffars .In other words people who have deviated from 'True Islam'

Here is Guru Sahib's own handwriting.

post-1107-128357843847_thumb.jpg

Veer ji, where is this document at? can you please give ALL their details about this document? pleaseeeeeee :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Swami Ananda's visit in 1911 was reported in The Sikh review many years back.He passed through Baghdad and saw the inscription.

He wrote a poem on it.

Swami Ananda Acharya's visit

In 1917, Macmillans published a collection of Swami Ananda Acharya's poems under the title 'Snow Birds'. In this collection there was a poem entitled: "On reading an Arabic inscription in a shrine outside the town of Baghdad, dated 912 Hejira" and is as below:

Upon this simple slab of granite did thou sit, discoursing of fraternal love and holy light, O Guru Nanak, Prince among India's holy sons.

What song from the source of Seven Waters thou didst sing to charm the soul of Iran!

What place from Himalaya's lonely caves and forests thou didst carry to the vinegroves and rose-gardens of Baghdad?

What light from Badrinath's snowy peak thou didst bear to illumine the heart of Bahlol, thy saintly Persian disciple?

Eighty-four nights Bahlol hearkened to thy words of Life and the Path and Spring Eternal, while the moon waxed and waned in the pomegranate grove beside the grassy desert of the dead.

And after thou hast left him to return to thy beloved Bharat's land, the fakir, it is said, would speak to none nor listen to the voice of man or angel;

His fame spread far and wide and the Shah came to pay his homage, but the holy man would take no earthly treasures nor hear the praise of kings and courtiers.

Thus lived he - lonely, devoted, thoughtful - sixty winters, sitting before the stone whereon thy sacred feet had rested.

And ere he left this house of Ignorance he wrote these words on the stone: "Here spake the Hindu Guru Nanak to Fakir Bahlol, and for these sixty winters since the Guru left Iran, the soul of Bahlol has rested on the Master's word, like a bee poised on a dawnlit honey-rose."

It is generally believed that Acharya visted the site before November 1914, and that we was probably led there by anecdotes from the local people.

The story Ananda Acharya relates in his poem is not found on the tablets in existence, and so it's possible that he either saw on some other tablets, or was told the story by local people according to their tradition.

Note:

Boundaries of countries have undergone changes with time.In this poem Baghdad is mentioned as part of Iran.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the bliss of being ignorant, no muslim worth his salt can say baba farid

as one of those thousand walis, every muslim in this sub continent knows

about the chishti Silsila (school) of SUFI SAINTS having nizamuddin aulia

and his disciples, that shows how much knowledge this guy has about

his own faith , so no comments on what he says may god bless him with

some wisdom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bhagat ji was Sufi, the speaker is Sunni. Sunnis despise Sufis as kuffars .In other words people who have deviated from 'True Islam'

Veer ji, where is this document at? can you please give ALL their details about this document? pleaseeeeeee smile.gif

yea id like to know too!!

which book is it??? has it got isbn numb??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vaheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru Ji Ki Fateh

This guy is crafty.

He hasnt denied that Satguru Sahib went to mecca he said theres no historical evidence of it. He then says that only muslims can enter mecca (as mentioned earlier, this is the case today, but wasnt true in the times of our Satguru Sahib). So here he is trying to say IF guru sahib went to mecca, this is only possible if Guru Sahib was a muslim.

He then says Satguru Ji escorted a muslim who wanted to go on Haaj. So, its like hes admitting Satguru Ji went to mecca, he has also contradicted him self, because he has said its not recorded in history, so how did he get this knowledge??

The sinner then insults Shiek / Bhagat Fareed Ji by playing down their holy bani by saying Bhagat Fareed ji was nothing special. he said Satguru Nanak Sahib respected Bhagat Fareed ji thats why his contributions is in Gurbani. He says cuz guru ji respected Bhagat Fareed ji, why would Satguru JI point his pavitar feet to the kabbah? (please note it was 5th Satguru Sahib that compiled the primal Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji and included the bani of Bhagat Fareed Ji! ). He says we would be offended if a muslim today went to Sri Amritsar Sahib and pointed his feet there. This is very true... Most Sikhs probably would be offended but we certainly would not deny that it happened!

It is well documented that Satguru ji went to mecca. Its no big deal, theres no need for any one to wet them selves and lie over it like this guy has. As pointed out, its well documented in a number of sources least of all in Bhai Gurdas Vaaran. Many Muslims use this sakhi as a double edged sword....on one hand they deny this happened, on the other they convince uneducated Sikhs that Satguru Nanak Sahib was a muslim in one of their many efforts to convert them. On this occasion the muslim in the video has done abit of both.

bhul chuk maaf

Vaheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru Ji Ki Fateh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The inscription plus many more pictures are included in Jeevan Chrittar Guru Nanak Dev Ji by Dr. Trilochan Singh. It is the best biography I have ever read. Like GPS said, these inscriptions are found in Baghdad where Guru Sahib met Behlol Dana who remained a Sikh for at least 30 years after Guru Ji's departure of Baghdad. Qazi Rukandeen accompanied Guru Ji from Baghdad to Punjab. Anandachariya's poem is based on one of the inscriptions he saw, picture of which is also included in the book. If Muslims really wish to refute Guru Ji's visit then at least they can allow Sikh scholars to examine all the facts. They allow other non-Muslims to make documentaries then surely they can allow Sikhs for the purpose of clearing the "allegation" against Mecca.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ji, where is this tablet or peice of writing?like what place was this written??

because the 'plate number 1' just seems like a writing that somone has translated into urdu script..

what is the plate's authenticity??

THis tablet is at the site where Guru sahib met Peer behlol.The city is Baghdad present capital of Iraq.

The language is Aarbic not Urdu.

The tablet was erected in 927 hijri that cooresponds to 1520-1521 AD and the date is written on tablet itself. The plate was by followers of Peer.

Sikhs discovered it much later.Swamy ji made trip to Norway on foot in 1911 and passed through Baghdad

when he saw the tablet.

If you have an account of udasis of Guru sahib the inscription date matches with travel period of Guru sahib

to Mecca.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use