Jump to content

Gurmail(Fake Guru) Sitting On Same Level As Guru Granth Sahib Ji Maharaj!


osingh
 Share

Recommended Posts

satan doesnt exist...and if he did..hes completely being controlled by waheguru...nothing wrong with lucifer pic

back to topic...akaal takhat please bring back lashings and beatings...they were the only days when people really listened to akaaal takhat...no one fears doing beadbi today...

Uh ohh, someone hasn't read their gurbaniii! lol

'Thieves, fornicators, harlots and procuresses, all in mutual friendship are bound. The wicked associate with each other, and together eat and drink. They know not the essence of devotion (attributes of God), ever in Satan's company living. A donkey rubbed over with sandal-paint, will still roll about in dust. Evil the measure and in wearing evil take pride. Says Nanak, those that spin evil (falsehood), evil is their wearing.'

'As the Word of the Forgiving Lord comes to me, so do I express it, O Lalo. Bringing the marriage party of sin, Babar has invaded from Kaabul, demanding our land as his wedding gift, O Lalo. Modesty and righteousness both have vanished, and falsehood struts around like a leader, O Lalo. The Qazis and the Brahmins have lost their roles, and Satan now conducts the marriage rites, O Lalo. The Muslim women read the Koran, and in their misery, they call upon God, O Lalo. The Hindu women of high social status, and others of lowly status as well, are put into the same category, O Lalo. The wedding songs of murder are sung, O Nanak, and blood is sprinkled instead of saffron, O Lalo. || 1 || (Guru Granth Sahib Ji p. 722-3)'

You may observe the thirty fasts, and say the five prayers each day, but Satan can undo them. Says Nanak, you will have to walk on the Path of Death, so why do you bother to collect wealth and property? || 4 || 27 || (Guru Granth Sahib Ji p.24)

Andd so on and so forth......

Calling Lucifer a sant, having him as a pic on a sikh forum, when sikhi blatantly asks us to steer clear of satan and satanic activity- is beyond strange not to meantion Totally disrespectful to the Gurus, Gurbani and Truth itself.

The darkness of ignorance is what he stands for and what he is, and that is opposed the path that we walk on towards discovering Truth in this dark age- fair enough this is a khel and all is God, but to get out of the illusion we need to do good deeds, bandgi etc, and this doesnt fall in line with satans hobbies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Erm Lucifer was an Angel of God before his fall from Grace....

Anyway, this surely may come as a revelation to you and those that question, this is the internet, and so called online personas are not to be taken literally little child....:rolleyes2:

This so called lucifer made Baba Aadam ( Adam ) and Eve eat that forbidden fruit on the forbidden tree and look now where we are !

And you still call this shaitan a sant Tongue.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol and now he is the most evil being of all time, responsible for Kalyug, I'd say god doesnt care that he was ever an angel and either does anyone else except his little groupies who think he runs things.

If you had an awareness of how the world works, you'd realise it's an illusion, our thoughts are what make kalyug what it is- the world is just symbolic reflection... Darshans of Lucifer are not going to make the world a better place- believe it. Why not replace it with an avatar of Guru Ji so people can conjure up thoughts of him and make the earth abit lighter instead- gurbani says whenever the guru is thought of, he is actually here.

May I ask exactly why you've chosen the devil as your avatar? Any particular reason- other than the fact hes a donkey raping child molesting murdering binge drinker who causes the world to do the same...

I lost the will to read after the first word...

What my Avtar is or isnt, is no concern of yours. You go about your business and I my own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

satan doesnt exist...and if he did..hes completely being controlled by waheguru...nothing wrong with lucifer pic

back to topic...akaal takhat please bring back lashings and beatings...they were the only days when people really listened to akaaal takhat...no one fears doing beadbi today...

Dustofsaints seems to be petrified of the image. Satan is mentioned in Gurbani veera. But we have our own Satan within us, Guru Saab said even the most evil person has the spirit of Waheguru within them.

The five vices are a form of Satan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uh ohh, someone hasn't read their gurbaniii! lol

'Thieves, fornicators, harlots and procuresses, all in mutual friendship are bound. The wicked associate with each other, and together eat and drink. They know not the essence of devotion (attributes of God), ever in Satan's company living. A donkey rubbed over with sandal-paint, will still roll about in dust. Evil the measure and in wearing evil take pride. Says Nanak, those that spin evil (falsehood), evil is their wearing.'

'As the Word of the Forgiving Lord comes to me, so do I express it, O Lalo. Bringing the marriage party of sin, Babar has invaded from Kaabul, demanding our land as his wedding gift, O Lalo. Modesty and righteousness both have vanished, and falsehood struts around like a leader, O Lalo. The Qazis and the Brahmins have lost their roles, and Satan now conducts the marriage rites, O Lalo. The Muslim women read the Koran, and in their misery, they call upon God, O Lalo. The Hindu women of high social status, and others of lowly status as well, are put into the same category, O Lalo. The wedding songs of murder are sung, O Nanak, and blood is sprinkled instead of saffron, O Lalo. || 1 || (Guru Granth Sahib Ji p. 722-3)'

You may observe the thirty fasts, and say the five prayers each day, but Satan can undo them. Says Nanak, you will have to walk on the Path of Death, so why do you bother to collect wealth and property? || 4 || 27 || (Guru Granth Sahib Ji p.24)

Andd so on and so forth......

Calling Lucifer a sant, having him as a pic on a sikh forum, when sikhi blatantly asks us to steer clear of satan and satanic activity- is beyond strange not to meantion Totally disrespectful to the Gurus, Gurbani and Truth itself.

The darkness of ignorance is what he stands for and what he is, and that is opposed the path that we walk on towards discovering Truth in this dark age- fair enough this is a khel and all is God, but to get out of the illusion we need to do good deeds, bandgi etc, and this doesnt fall in line with satans hobbies.

i have read my gurbani, and i already know satan is mentioned in gurbani...but is it literal or metaphorical?....are devil and maya not the same thing?....if the devil exists he is 100% in the control of waheguru and working for him...which in result does not make him bad...is Izraeel (messenger of death) bad?...he snatches your soul away violently ...what about the jamdoots who torture you on your way to dharamraaj?...are not these satan-like yet they exist and work in accordance of wahegurus will..they exist because waheguru deems it so...so if the devil exists its because waheguru allows him to.....friend you need to get your head out of the bible and the quran..we are not a abrahamic faith...so we do not take their understanding of hell, heaven, god and satan as our understanding..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dustofsaints seems to be petrified of the image. Satan is mentioned in Gurbani veera. But we have our own Satan within us, Guru Saab said even the most evil person has the spirit of Waheguru within them.

The five vices are a form of Satan.

Lol, petrified, no in all Truth, it takes alot more than that to scare me at this moment. I have already stated the fact that god is all, what is there to be afraid of when parbrahm ji is everywhere. What I am trying to say is best summed up by this:

They know not the essence of devotion (attributes of God), ever in Satan's company living.

Although even satan is god, he represents the darkness of ignorance(negativity) which is also the root of the 5 thieves. In symbolic image(all imagery in the world), Truth(Opposite of ignorance) looks like light, and ignorance looks like darkness.

On the path of bhagti, one steers clear of negativity(darkness/ignorance) as much as possible until attaining realisation. Once the lord is realised(physically realised by applying gurbani properly to ones life ie- truly knowing and experiencing the essence of devotion, not just reading it) satans influence is no longer there as he is expereienced in his true form(nothingness/ no image or form- the state of god).

Until Actual realisation we are just ignorant fools steadily working our way up the path of bhagti, deluded by maya and satan(negative force). Satans form and negativity is just really symbolic imagery as we all are- for we truly have no form, only Truth exists....

P.s I never asked you to change yoru picture, I was just wondering whatever possessed you to choose a picture of such a manmat being and call it a Saint when everything it represents is the anithesis of what gurbani describes as a saint/ Brahmgyani.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol, petrified, no in all Truth, it takes alot more than that to scare me at this moment. I have already stated the fact that god is all, what is there to be afraid of when parbrahm ji is everywhere. What I am trying to say is best summed up by this:

They know not the essence of devotion (attributes of God), ever in Satan's company living.

Although even satan is god, he represents the darkness of ignorance(negativity) which is also the root of the 5 thieves. In symbolic image(all imagery in the world), Truth(Opposite of ignorance) looks like light, and ignorance looks like darkness.

On the path of bhagti, one steers clear of negativity(darkness/ignorance) as much as possible until attaining realisation. Once the lord is realised(physically realised by applying gurbani properly to ones life ie- truly knowing and experiencing the essence of devotion, not just reading it) satans influence is no longer there as he is expereienced in his true form(nothingness/ no image or form- the state of god).

Until Actual realisation we are just ignorant fools steadily working our way up the path of bhagti, deluded by maya and satan(negative force). Satans form and negativity is just really symbolic imagery as we all are- for we truly have no form, only Truth exists....

P.s I never asked you to change yoru picture, I was just wondering whatever possessed you to choose a picture of such a manmat being and call it a Saint when everything it represents is the anithesis of what gurbani describes as a saint/ Brahmgyani.

Mandela says you should chill out or just log off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use