Jump to content

Sikhtv Channel 848, Doesn’T Exist


Gurooo
 Share

Recommended Posts

Probably lack of funding.

Its not good to be spreading around the Sangat's money to three different channel.

Wouldn't is be 10 times better to have one singular channel that would get a lot of funding and in turn provide proffesional coverage to all of Europe?

I think that would be cool

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no connection to the theives who are bringing Sikh TV down or Bhai Gagandip Singh Ji's family/friends The thieves Manpreet n Co who moved in after Gagandip's Death as opportunists have been seen removing all the equipment from the TV Station in West Bromwich.Gagandip's family gave this Manpreet a 50% Share in the Channel after Gagandip was murdered - all of a sudden Manpreet & his thugs,turned on Gagandip's Family & Bhai Gursevak Singh Ji who was with Sikh TV from the Start ,Manpreet and Co then sacked the majority of the Staff atfer doing stupid programmes on Kabbaddi - We ALL know that Kabbaddi is linked to thugs in our community thats why they keep showing it again and again, Since Gursevak Singh Ji was thrown out by the thieves the channel has been going downhill all his work and Gagandip's work has been put to the drain - They have destroyed Gagandip's legacy & continue to do so. As of now certain groups run the 'religious programming' ,had Gagandip been alive he would have never allowed these people near the station not only due to their views but also due to the fact they HATED Gagandip with a passion they have now teamed up with these thugs to be the 'religious side' while the thugs go around filming Kabbaddi/Football matches and so on.This is the reason you see so much Kabbaddi ,dodgy Baba's and only certain Jathebandia being promoted, when Gursevak Singh Ji was running the Channel it was under the Maryada of Akal Takht Sahib ji and no jathebandi or group or people were given preference ,now they sacked Bhai Sahib its clear for all to see. Don't these people have shame? What would Gagandip think?This is the sad state of our community

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no connection to the theives who are bringing Sikh TV down or Bhai Gagandip Singh Ji's family/friends The thieves Manpreet n Co who moved in after Gagandip's Death as opportunists have been seen removing all the equipment from the TV Station in West Bromwich.Gagandip's family gave this Manpreet a 50% Share in the Channel after Gagandip was murdered - all of a sudden Manpreet & his thugs,turned on Gagandip's Family & Bhai Gursevak Singh Ji who was with Sikh TV from the Start ,Manpreet and Co then sacked the majority of the Staff atfer doing stupid programmes on Kabbaddi - We ALL know that Kabbaddi is linked to thugs in our community thats why they keep showing it again and again, Since Gursevak Singh Ji was thrown out by the thieves the channel has been going downhill all his work and Gagandip's work has been put to the drain - They have destroyed Gagandip's legacy & continue to do so. As of now certain groups run the 'religious programming' ,had Gagandip been alive he would have never allowed these people near the station not only due to their views but also due to the fact they HATED Gagandip with a passion they have now teamed up with these thugs to be the 'religious side' while the thugs go around filming Kabbaddi/Football matches and so on.This is the reason you see so much Kabbaddi ,dodgy Baba's and only certain Jathebandia being promoted, when Gursevak Singh Ji was running the Channel it was under the Maryada of Akal Takht Sahib ji and no jathebandi or group or people were given preference ,now they sacked Bhai Sahib its clear for all to see. Don't these people have shame? What would Gagandip think?This is the sad state of our community

Mandela asks who is this Manpreet, he should be exposed with a picture on here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No big loss!

Unless there's a radical change in programming, I personally don't see the need to get excited about Sikh TV. Sikh TV's quality of programming is much weaker compared to the other 2.

There is Sikh TV. Sangat TV, what is the other one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are weaknesses in ALL 3 channels, but by far Sikh TV has to be the weaker one because of some of the programming it broadcasts.

Is it not better to have ONE channel? Why do we need 3 it becomes competition all for the wrong reasons. Then they all ask for direct debits but if one person supports one channel how do you expect that same person to pay for the other 2? So it's better to have ONE channel overall because then problems like this arise, going off air etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use