Jump to content

Reality of Sexual Grooming Gangs in the UK (Interview with Andrew Norfolk by SAS)


Hammertime007
 Share

Recommended Posts

^^ well ive heard i a few paki gangs have been challanged out side the school gates photos taken car plates jotted.

May be they will move on to the middle class areas ( not that we want them too)

There has been a few reports that middle class girls have been groomed very small number (again dont wish it on anyone)

Ive spoke to some educated working class white guys, they say "the white working classes have little concern on this subject, too much in to Brits got talent, and Preimership"

I also say ' our communty is a sleep on the subject, too much in to fat wedding wedding, Mercs, and hols to Dubia' Bhai Mohan mentions this usually in his lecture.

The reason they havent targetted the middle class girls is due to the fact they have no connections. Well off muslims dont want them dumping on their own doorstep and muslim families avoid middle class schools as they dont want their girls becoming westernised. If the suls could get middle class girls, they would. But then the middle class would be a lot better at galvanizing and organising the chavs/working class so maybe the muslims dont want to bite off more than they can chew. It's also because the white secret societies/paedophiles have that area as their own and wouldnt welcome these muslim folk encroaching on their area. Sikhs have to bare in mind the sexual culture of the people we live with, some of them dont mind things that we would consider disgusting.

Sikhs are in a pre-Partition state of mind. No idea what the future holds so we dance around like it's some Disney fantasy and think things will be alright on the night. Then the <banned word filter activated> hits the fan and we have to make do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sikhs are in a pre-Partition state of mind. No idea what the future holds so we dance around like it's some Disney fantasy and think things will be alright on the night. Then the <banned word filter activated> hits the fan and we have to make do

You know what. It doesn't appear as if ANYTHING wakes apnay up from their dreamworld. They simply do not understand the idea/need of strategic level thinking and organisation - we are purely reactive - nothing seems to be able to change this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

This is the reply to the email I sent BBC on 22 Nov regarding the news report. Just got the reply today:

"Thanks for contacting us regarding the ‘BBC News at Six’ on the 21 November.

We understand you were unhappy with the programme’s use of the term ‘Asian’.

Our report said, “...Of those, 545 were white, 415 of Asian origin and 244 from black or Afro-Caribbean backgrounds.”

In regards to our coverage of the Rochdale child grooming trial, the term ‘Asian’ was used alongside "from Pakistan and Afghanistan" to describe the ethnic origin of the men. The News Channel used both, depending on the context of the report .The short form ‘Asians’ was used in headlines and very brief summaries of the story. We felt it was important to be as specific as possible whenever we could, precisely because of the risk of leading viewers to form judgements on all "Asians".

We understand that this may have offended those from Asian communities at what they saw as an oversimplification but we used the longer description whenever possible in our reports.

We’d like to assure you that we've registered your complaint on our audience log. This is an internal report of audience feedback which we compile daily and is available for viewing by all our staff. This includes all programme makers and presenters, along with our senior management. It ensures that your points, along with all other comments we receive, are circulated and considered across the BBC.

Thanks again for contacting us.

Kind Regards"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the point. Every time we complain about the use of 'Asian' we get fobbed off by the above type of letter. Same old, same old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a very patronising reply will put on. There's more arrests from BBC pesos. Just shows not only do they hide crimes of pedoes they harbour pedoes. They are In it together.

Brother, with all their secret societies, paedo churches, paedo private schools, paedo figures of authority etc how can you not see this is fairly normal behaviour in their culture as long as it is not flaunted? I already said that different cultures have different behaviours and Sikhs who live in these countries shouldnt act so surprised when the 'hosts' live up to their dark side. The muslims are abrahamic and share the same barbarian roots as the arabs (who are famed for this in their culture) so why act so surprised?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for contacting the BBC regarding ‘BBC News at Six’ broadcast on the 21st November. I understand that you would prefer that the term Asian isn’t used regarding the report on the sexual

exploitation of children. I note that you would like to see every single nationality identified instead of using this broader term. Whilst we appreciate fully the sensitivities involved in this report, we refer to those involved as 'Asian' rather than using a more specific term because they are of mixed nationality. There is no question of the term 'Asian' being used in a negative context - it is simply the most appropriate designation in these circumstances. That said, noting your strength of feeling, all of your comments have been registered on our audience log. Audience reaction is crucial to the BBC and this log is an internal report of feedback which we compile daily and make availableto allchannel executives, including the BBC Executive board and BBC News. I can assure you that we do take our complaints seriously and the logs are seen as important documents whereby our audience can help shape decisions about the future of our programming and content. Thank you again for taking the time to write to us and bringing your feelings on this matter to our attention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Just listened to half of the Andrew Norfolk interview with Bhai Mohan Singh. Definitely a 'must' listen for any Sikh (and other communities) living in the UK. 50 of 53 men persecuted for child-grooming in groups at the time of the interview in 2012, were Muslim, majority of these Pakistani/Pakistani Kashmiri/Mirpuri

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use