Jump to content

Washing Darbar Sahib Floor With Milk Is Equal To ShivJi's ** - Singh Sabha Canada


DSGj
 Share

Recommended Posts

Missionaries need to study royalty/devotional aspect in Sikhi, right now they come across as bunch of whiners, over paranoid, silly sissy, hysterical, hyper sensitive high school girl types..they need to grow a pair- always argue over small stuff..what a bunch of fussar panthis.!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your right on the mark!

Guru gobind Singh Ji lived like a king.He had a ring,kalgi,necklace,etc.

But then again Satguru throw away, bright, shinny, and expensive rocks into the river as they were nothing.

How many mercede/bmw/audi driving people are ready to throw away their car for a simple compact car? However they don't want Darbar Sahib floors washed with milk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sing along this shabad in Asa sangat jee to completely immerse yourself in Prem ras - with no regard to any of the worldly 'valuables

Dude its not a worldly value, washing darbar sahib floor with milk is devotion shown to satguru granth sahib ji maharaj yes parchar of that needs to strike right balance which they do.....you point being worldly valuables does not make sense here..next time missionaries will have problem is "chaur sahib" ..they going to claim how thats worldly valuables and push left wing peta agenda on to the panth..they need do us a favor... join some left wing peta movement, leave sikh devotional affairs alone..to be honest its bit out of missionary league to understand how human consciousnesses works with devotional aspect in sikhi...pretty much all my mona brother in law are affected by heretic missionary parchar of khandan-mandan..its like talking two separate things without any common mutual understanding ..its becoming pretty pathetic and old broken record. get over it ..missionaries should stick to what they know and what they good at such as sikh political activism...you have my backing there..!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't it a bit of a waste though? That milk could be given to poor people who are starving. I think guru sahib would prefer that rather than people using it to clean him.

100% agreed brother that what you said is what Gurmat teaches us

Guru sahib was against ritualistic show of respect ......

I completely agree with Chuck Singh Norris that milk should go to starving children who need and can benefit much more form it rather than the marble -

Parupkaar or altruism is placed very highly in Gurbani

"Mithya tan nahi parupkaari"

Any resource that can improve lots of humans should be used for that purpose before for any religious ritual.

Exactly Paji you're 100% right with your pro-Gurmat stance

There was no gold ever at Harmandir Sahib during Guru's times. it was installed by Maharaja Ranjit Singh's whose many actions like having multiple ranis were out of line with gurmat.

Gold is not shown any importance in Gurbani -

"Jo nar dukh main dukh nahi maane , Kaanchan maati jane"

Exactly Paji, gold on Harmandar Sahib is totally against Gurmat, given that world hunger has not yet been defeated as Sikhi wishes to achieve.

Your right on the mark!

Guru gobind Singh Ji lived like a king.He had a ring,kalgi,necklace,etc.

Don't believe all the recent portraits you see to be accurate reflections of reality bro. Dasme PaathShah were the paragon of humility. The Kalgi - which did not cost anything - was symbolic to send the message the Mughals that the Sikh Panth which has unbreakable faith in one God and believes in justice and equality for the downtrodden cannot be constrained or banned from carrying weapons as the Islamic Empire wanted our Sikh Panth to stop doing. As for any of our Guru Sahibs wearing gold rings and diamond necklaces like some rappers - "don't believe the hype" (if you are old enough to understand the musical reference bro :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

100% agreed that what you said is what Gurmat teaches us

Exactly Paji you're 100% right with your pro-Gurmat stance

Exactly Paji, gold on Harmandar Sahib is totally against Gurmat, given that world hunger has not yet been defeated as Sikhi wishes to achieve.

Don't believe all the recent portraits you see to be accurate reflections of reality bro. Dasme PaathShah were the paragon of humility. The Kalgi - which did not cost anything - was symbolic to send the message the Mughals that the Sikh Panth which has unbreakable faith in one God and believes in justice and equality for the downtrodden cannot be constrained or banned from carrying weapons as the Islamic Empire wanted our Sikh Panth to stop doing.

I haven't been basing this on portraits.I have seen these with my eyes.I have seen guru jis ring.In the next month I will be posting pictures of my trip to India and show you his ring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

100% agreed that what you said is what Gurmat teaches us

Exactly Paji you're 100% right with your pro-Gurmat stance

Exactly Paji, gold on Harmandar Sahib is totally against Gurmat, given that world hunger has not yet been defeated as Sikhi wishes to achieve.

Don't believe all the recent portraits you see to be accurate reflections of reality bro. Dasme PaathShah were the paragon of humility. The Kalgi - which did not cost anything - was symbolic to send the message the Mughals that the Sikh Panth which has unbreakable faith in one God and believes in justice and equality for the downtrodden cannot be constrained or banned from carrying weapons as the Islamic Empire wanted our Sikh Panth to stop doing.

as stated earlier, why not just take down darbar sahib, brick by brick and sell them for charlty? Sell all the marble from all the gurdwaras. Why stop there? Does Guru maharaj ji need a bed in sachkhand? ......... * facepalm*
Link to comment
Share on other sites

100% agreed brother that what you said is what Gurmat teaches us

Exactly Paji you're 100% right with your pro-Gurmat stance

Exactly Paji, gold on Harmandar Sahib is totally against Gurmat, given that world hunger has not yet been defeated as Sikhi wishes to achieve.

Don't believe all the recent portraits you see to be accurate reflections of reality bro. Dasme PaathShah were the paragon of humility. The Kalgi - which did not cost anything - was symbolic to send the message the Mughals that the Sikh Panth which has unbreakable faith in one God and believes in justice and equality for the downtrodden cannot be constrained or banned from carrying weapons as the Islamic Empire wanted our Sikh Panth to stop doing. As for any of our Guru Sahibs wearing gold rings and diamond necklaces like some rappers - "don't believe the hype" (if you are old enough to understand the musical reference bro :-)

http://www.sikhsangat.com/index.php?/topic/63504-guru-gobind-singh-jis-attire/

You will see guru jis pearl necklace,his kalgi,gajgah

http://www.<banned site filter activated>/gurus/Guru%20Gobind/guru-ring.jpg

His ring.I have seen this ring in person.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use