** Tom Watson Uk Member Of Parliament Reveals Biggest Secret: Britain Involved In 1984 Army Attack On Darbar Sahib

[doctor_mani 27]

David Cameron never misses any opportunity to win votes. I'm sure the conservatives knew all along about Britsins stance in 1984 hence their silence about this matter. He''s the one who refused to apologise about jalia Walachia bhag. Pit would be foolish to think we're going to get justice from this government 30 years on

[WaljinderSingh 834]

[cool water 143]

What I dont understand is why would Margaret thatcher a supposed leader of a nation (United Kingdom) at cold war with the USSR soviet communists at the time ...give SAS advisory / military help to a nation like India who is allied with their foe? While the American CIA who are strongly allied with British military and Intelligence was busy aiding all groups it could master against USSR plans and networks.

The KGB had a strong military and political presence with indira gandhi and her govt. Some Indian analysts say induced the attack of operation blue star against sant bhindranwale for his policies that not in favor of communist ideology. So what I dont understand is why a western British prime minister would have given any support to (India) nation that was in bed with their ideological enemy (soviet communists).

I can only think of covert British establishment racism and tacit genocidal support against the Sikhs of India and their political aspirations of independence.

[WaljinderSingh 834]

Photo by Anwar Hussein/Landov

Margaret Thatcher's Real Soul Mate Was Indira Gandhi

by Bruce Riedel

17.04.2013

They fought wars, thrived in a male-dominated political world, and faced controversy at home. Bruce Riedel on the kinship between Margaret Thatcher and Indira Gandhi.

Americans are making much of the partnership between President Ronald Reagan and Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher following her death last week, but the baroness's real soul mate was another Iron Lady, Prime Minister Indira Nehru Gandhi.

The two prime ministers were both polarizing figures in their own countries who left behind very controversial legacies. They first meet in September 1976 when Thatcher visited India as head of the Conservative Party. Two months earlier Gandhi had declared a state of emergency in India, suspending freedom of the press and imprisoning dozens of her political enemies. Thatcher was supportive and made no public criticism of the emergency. As one of Thatcher’s biographers later wrote, the two had from the beginning a “uniquely easy relationship.” Gandhi’s biographer wrote that “Indira and Thatcher were aberrations in the predominately male world of politics” and “their loneliness as women leaders led them to form a bond.”

Gandhi lost her next reelection bid and went into the political wilderness for a time. She visited London in November 1978 and Thatcher urged her not to give up politics and to run again. Gandhi ran for reelection again in January 1980 and won a clear majority in parliament. Her “private visit” to the U.K. was credited with refurbishing her international reputation and stature at home.

In November 1983 Gandhi hosted Thatcher and Queen Elizabeth at a Commonwealth Summit in New Delhi. It was a triumph for both and a demonstration of their skills at the ballot box.

The two had many things in common but perhaps the most important was their success as military leaders. Margaret Thatcher of course prevailed over Argentina in the Falklands war. Despite lukewarm support from Reagan and against formidable logistical odds, the Royal Navy carried an expeditionary force from one end of the Atlantic Ocean to another and defeated the Argentines.

Gandhi prevailed over Pakistan in the 1971 war that led to Bangladesh’s freedom. She prevailed in spite of the opposition of the United States. President Richard Nixon actively urged Iran and China to come to Pakistan’s help and sent an American carrier battle group into the Bay of Bengal to intimidate Gandhi. She was not frightened by gun boat diplomacy, and in December 1971 more than 90,000 Pakistani troops surrendered to Gandhi’s generals in Dhaka, the darkest day in the history of the Pakistani army. The two demonstrated that women can be tough leaders in wartime and defeat tin-pot dictators.

On October 11, 1984, Thatcher was the target of an assassination attempt by the Irish Republican Army that blew up the hotel that the Conservative Party was using for its annual conference in Brighton. Five died in the attack. Gandhi called Thatcher almost immediately to send her best wishes and counsel resolve. Twenty days later, Gandhi was shot to death by her own Sikh bodyguards in New Delhi. She died in the arms of her daughter-in-law, Sonia Gandhi. Vice President George Bush came to the funeral as did many world leaders including Yassir Arafat and Zia ul Huq, but the star attraction was the British prime minister, Margaret Thatcher, paying her respects as one Iron Lady to another.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/04/17/margaret-thatcher-s-real-soul-mate-was-indira-gandhi.html

[WaljinderSingh 834]

"The clue was in this painting all along....

'Recalling Tragedy: The Singh Twins' Nineteen Eighty Four'

( Link to original painting: http://singhtwins.co.uk/1984.html)

Painting was done in 1998!!

Look who's behind Indira!!

WHY did they attack the Sikhs holiest shrine?

Joyce Pettigrew explains:

"The Army went into Darbar Sahib not to eliminate a political figure or a political movement but to suppress the culture of a people, to attack their heart, to strike a blow at their spirit and self-confidence."

PARNAAM SHAHEEDA NU!!! "

Sikh Youth-Project

[DiscoverSikhism 342]

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa, Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh Ji

Waljinder Bhaji, Thank you for posting the Akaal channel coverage.

An important point was raised, where was the UK democracy and parliamentary scrutiny? For a nation that prides itself on its good conduct, ethics and values, this is hypocrisy at its highest.

Margaret Thatcher has tainted her legacy by acting like the military dictator that Indira Gandhi became.

Indira Gandhi, a ruthless military dictator? Oh Yes...

How often have you heard Gandhi described as 'the extremist military dictator that abused the rule of law and democracy'?

You can read how Indira Gandhi was the real extremist and terrorist here - http://www.discoversikhism.com/sikh_news/1984_sikh_genocide.html

[Mehtab Singh 3,910]

The real attitude and mindset of most Indians is clearly visible from the sort of reader comments they are making under various news articles online, not just now but in the past as well. A small number of them regret the army attack, many others justify it. A large number of them condemn the genocide of Nov. '84 but there are some who consider that a "lesson-teaching" to Sikhs. At times I feel the British and Muslims were the real candidates who should have always ruled over these thankless people and kept them in their place. Sadly in those circumstances our situation wouldn't be any different either.

[aissf84 11]

Betrayal against sikhs

[Singh, Mahan 238]

"The clue was in this painting all along....

'Recalling Tragedy: The Singh Twins' Nineteen Eighty Four'

( Link to original painting: http://singhtwins.co.uk/1984.html)

Painting was done in 1998!!

Look who's behind Indira!!

WHY did they attack the Sikhs holiest shrine?

Joyce Pettigrew explains:

"The Army went into Darbar Sahib not to eliminate a political figure or a political movement but to suppress the culture of a people, to attack their heart, to strike a blow at their spirit and self-confidence."

PARNAAM SHAHEEDA NU!!! "

Sikh Youth-Project

[WaljinderSingh 834]

Sant ji was asked that there are allegations by Govt of India that ISI agents come from Pakistan and meet you at Darbar Sahib complex on a regular basis.

This was sant ji's answer:

- who gave them this information?

- When they know that ISI agents cross the border and enter India and get back to Pak, why didnt the BSF ( border security force) catch them at the border while entering or exiting India?

- if the Indian govt is telling the truth then either the force at the border is useless or the Indian govt colludes with the Pak govt. and gets first hand info ditrectly from ISI itself.

[WaljinderSingh 834]

Statement from Ed Miliband MP, Leader of the Labour Party:

“The attack on the Golden Temple in Amritsar in 1984 was a tragedy. The attack and subsequent violence against Sikhs across India led to the death of thousands of innocent civilians.

“The Sikh community in Britain is understandably deeply concerned at reports of the involvement of the British Government in the attack.

“I welcome the Government’s decision to investigate the matter, but this must be done transparently and – with the 30th anniversary of the attack on the Golden Temple approaching in less than six months – with a clear timetable.

“The Government should commit to delivering an urgent statement to the Commons and publish all relevant material so that we can have transparency on this important issue. We need to know how the Government intends to proceed with its investigation in a way that will maintain the confidence of the British public.”

Sikh Channel

[WaljinderSingh 834]

**** BREAKING

New documents released by MP Tom Watson show discussion about winning huge defence contracts with India.

Letter dated 9 Nov 1983 - prior to agreeing to send SAS to India for assistance and planning.

[WaljinderSingh 834]

PM David Cameron calling it a conspiracy at the parliament today and said that Brar's statement (Operation planned and carried out solely by India) is very important and relevant in the investigation.

MP Tom Watson asked Cameron if westland helicopters deal had to do with sending SAS for assistance.

Will anyone trust the UK govt if the outcome of this enquiry says UK has nothing to do with it?

[WaljinderSingh 834]

[JeevanCymro 50]

One of the finest journalists in BBC - there are some errors imho in the article.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-25741861