Jump to content

Indian Brahmin Hindu Racist Extremist Media And Their Use Of "sikh Terrorist"


Recommended Posts

Funny how you never saw the term "hindu terrorist" when some BJP hindu groups were caught killing Sikhs in 1984 and recently attacking Muslims in 2002 and blowing up masjids in 2007 and beyond because they are in the majority and the minorities are fair gain to get labeled and attacked. While brahmin hindu extremists want Sikhism wiped off in India the atheist extremists in power in the west want the same with all religions. We are in a real struggle of freedom of religion in todays world. When people think it is better to be atheist or non-religious just look at home many wars atheist western governments have caused artound the world and mass murder of countless innocent people in the 20th and 21 centuries. Atheists (ie those who have no theologic belief in God) are the most violent people by far if we look at how many people been killed by them and prison populations and second are the muslims. But no agenda against atheist demonis-ation because they are in the majority and power and majorities when targeting a minority is very dangerous for society as they lead to social strife, violent incidents and then wars/genocides.

The deliberate demon-isation and provocation by the racist brahmin hindu indian media against Sikhs, needs to be fought against in all area's of society. No Sikh I know supports the killing of innocent civilians or BKI or any other group. But even if Sikhs did support self defence armed Khalistan military organisations that would be their legimate right to do so to fend off the oppressor larger murderous state they are trying to free themselves from. Freedom does not come cheap no nation on earth has had the privilege of being granted a country without any blood price. George washington and his comrades most who were freemasons did not free America from the yolk of British rule without a fight, many thousands were killed to gain freedom from the rule of the Christian king of England. Similarly those brave Sikhs who sacrificed their lives in blood, sweat and tears for the freedom and justice for Sikhs will always be held in high regard by our community.

In the UK it is dangerous to allow elemants of hindu indian extremists have their sway in UK govt agenda and policy. As Sikhs want self determination for Khalistan or who oppose indian terrorism and genocides will be lumped in with Islamic jihadi nutters whose agenda is entirely different and evil they want global islamic supremacy and 7th century laws ....Sikhs dont, we want all of humanity to prosper and live in peace with each other but we also want our rights respected to have our own nation state with its own Sikh rules and regulations just as the Jews have their own state and the muslims have countless 26 countries and atheists in Europe have nations catering for their needs.

The danger of sleep walking into a totalitarian police surveillance state is very much real as these dangerous poisonous people will claim sikhs are radical because they do not allowed genocides against them happen without putting up a fight, the Sikhs dont sit there and take it like good slaves because Guru's taught as to fight abuse of power by the powerful. Are we to follow and hold the the glorious Guru's as our role models or vile corrupt politicians who sanction the murder of people and wreak lands in foreign wars for monetary economic interests?

Sikhs need to be very vigilant to the dangerous agenda's these inhumane people have. And its high time Western Sikhs become politically active opposing these anti-sikh people. We need to become educated in current affairs and pay interest in the world's geo-politics.

Below is an example of newspaper article which is clearly having all the hallmarks of anti-sikh propaganda material that indian brahmin hindu extremists in mainstream indian media produce time to time.

http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2015-01-08/news/57838417_1_sikh-bki-uk-police

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Things is the slyness of the Indian Brahmins knows no bounds , for years they have been cultivating this 'benign cow-worshipping' 'ahimsa loving' image so it is hard for the west to see them as the meglomaniac human rights abusers they are , I mean look at the West's slowness to wake up to the truth of MOhandas Gandhi, hero of the HIndu cause.

The jungle started hitting the fan when the Rape stats rose astronomically and foreigners were becoming statistics also . Then the government scrambled to show they were going to change things to the world .

We should highlight EVERY human right abuse going on there whether it is to us or others, as this will show the World the true nature of this and every Indian Government since 1947 ...

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

Funny how you never saw the term "hindu terrorist" when some BJP hindu groups were caught killing Sikhs in 1984 and recently attacking Muslims in 2002 and blowing up masjids in 2007 and beyond because they are in the majority and the minorities are fair gain to get labeled and attacked. While brahmin hindu extremists want Sikhism wiped off in India the atheist extremists in power in the west want the same with all religions. We are in a real struggle of freedom of religion in todays world. When people think it is better to be atheist or non-religious just look at home many wars atheist western governments have caused artound the world and mass murder of countless innocent people in the 20th and 21 centuries. Atheists (ie those who have no theologic belief in God) are the most violent people by far if we look at how many people been killed by them and prison populations and second are the muslims. But no agenda against atheist demonis-ation because they are in the majority and power and majorities when targeting a minority is very dangerous for society as they lead to social strife, violent incidents and then wars/genocides.

The deliberate demon-isation and provocation by the racist brahmin hindu indian media against Sikhs, needs to be fought against in all area's of society. No Sikh I know supports the killing of innocent civilians or BKI or any other group. But even if Sikhs did support self defence armed Khalistan military organisations that would be their legimate right to do so to fend off the oppressor larger murderous state they are trying to free themselves from. Freedom does not come cheap no nation on earth has had the privilege of being granted a country without any blood price. George washington and his comrades most who were freemasons did not free America from the yolk of British rule without a fight, many thousands were killed to gain freedom from the rule of the Christian king of England. Similarly those brave Sikhs who sacrificed their lives in blood, sweat and tears for the freedom and justice for Sikhs will always be held in high regard by our community.

In the UK it is dangerous to allow elemants of hindu indian extremists have their sway in UK govt agenda and policy. As Sikhs want self determination for Khalistan or who oppose indian terrorism and genocides will be lumped in with Islamic jihadi nutters whose agenda is entirely different and evil they want global islamic supremacy and 7th century laws ....Sikhs dont, we want all of humanity to prosper and live in peace with each other but we also want our rights respected to have our own nation state with its own Sikh rules and regulations just as the Jews have their own state and the muslims have countless 26 countries and atheists in Europe have nations catering for their needs.

The danger of sleep walking into a totalitarian police surveillance state is very much real as these dangerous poisonous people will claim sikhs are radical because they do not allowed genocides against them happen without putting up a fight, the Sikhs dont sit there and take it like good slaves because Guru's taught as to fight abuse of power by the powerful. Are we to follow and hold the the glorious Guru's as our role models or vile corrupt politicians who sanction the murder of people and wreak lands in foreign wars for monetary economic interests?

Sikhs need to be very vigilant to the dangerous agenda's these inhumane people have. And its high time Western Sikhs become politically active opposing these anti-sikh people. We need to become educated in current affairs and pay interest in the world's geo-politics.

Below is an example of newspaper article which is clearly having all the hallmarks of anti-sikh propaganda material that indian brahmin hindu extremists in mainstream indian media produce time to time.

http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2015-01-08/news/57838417_1_sikh-bki-uk-police

U sound like an ignorant fellow just google saffron terror or hindutva terror u will have u r answer same brahmin media whom u despise have written articles on it

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was wondering if we could do some analysis on the mindset of the Brahmin.

For some reason, Brahmin hierarchy sees the Sikhs as a threat. I think that we as Sikhs do not notice things about ourselves that non-Sikhs do.

When a brahmin sees a Sikh, what is his/her perception of us? What kind of things does he/she about us that they find threatening? What do they have to gain by trying to put down Sikhs?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was wondering if we could do some analysis on the mindset of the Brahmin.

For some reason, Brahmin hierarchy sees the Sikhs as a threat. I think that we as Sikhs do not notice things about ourselves that non-Sikhs do.

When a brahmin sees a Sikh, what is his/her perception of us? What kind of things does he/she about us that they find threatening? What do they have to gain by trying to put down Sikhs?

simple the centuries old social manipulation of humans under laws of Manu would come under question and other superstitious practices which benefit the Brahmins directly would be eroded. The majority of the population of Hindu India is of the lower or scheduled castes if they were free from this burden how would India cope ??? Everyone would demand respect, decent food, accomodation, legal protection and Justice . Wow , that would be like a human tsunami against all the oppression , no army could control that ...That's why SIkhi should concentrate on those people , look at all the sakhis who did Guru ji associate with and visit ? the poor people the outcast people it was their inner jot that They recognised and we have to . We would have a standing fauj no doubts

Link to post
Share on other sites

JKV

So Sikhs represent a threat of dismantling of the caste/varna system which Brahmins are the main beneficieries. It represents empowerment of the individual from whatever level of the social strata they come from, whereas the caste system segments society and brings a helplessness and fatalistic mentality that if you should accept your role/social status that you were born into.

For over one thousand years, India was ruled by Muslims and then the British. What was the behaviour of the Brahmins during this time, what tactics did they use as a survival mechanism. How did they maintain their apex in the caste hierarchy, how did they cope with millions of their co-religionists leaving hinduism?

Link to post
Share on other sites

JKV

So Sikhs represent a threat of dismantling of the caste/varna system which Brahmins are the main beneficieries. It represents empowerment of the individual from whatever level of the social strata they come from, whereas the caste system segments society and brings a helplessness and fatalistic mentality that if you should accept your role/social status that you were born into.

For over one thousand years, India was ruled by Muslims and then the British. What was the behaviour of the Brahmins during this time, what tactics did they use as a survival mechanism. How did they maintain their apex in the caste hierarchy, how did they cope with millions of their co-religionists leaving hinduism?

Most of us know that the Brahmins were clever enough to get sponsors with clout e.g. hill rajas and Rajputs (who sold their daughters to the firangis as price for their kingdoms)to help them maintain status quo in their own lives , why would they care for the deaths of SIkhs, or lower castes or even forcibly conversions as they often are quoted as saying that there was so many hindu souls it would have been impossible to convert all or kill all. Their own arrogance and shortsightedness lead them to dire straits by the time of Guru Teg Bahadur ji, the noose of death was getting tight now that their employers were changing faiths and thus they came to GUru ji. By the time the Khalsa came and dealt with the mughals and afghans the danger was over without them moving a muscle to save anyone apart from their own skins.

The british are really not the same as the Mughals in terms of danger to status quo as they enjoyed the free /cheap labour provided by the hierarchy. They may have converted a few thousand of people but it was nothing to overly upset the apple cart. Besides the Brahmins wheedled their way into controlling everything via the Bureaucracy built by the firangis even to i effect be put in charge of Sikh affairs why? because the British wanted the SIkhs subdued and what better way than to create worries over their religious sites and practices.

Link to post
Share on other sites

U sound like an ignorant fellow just google saffron terror or hindutva terror u will have u r answer same brahmin media whom u despise have written articles on it

No your the ignorant one.

Who spoke out against hindutva terror? It was rahul gandhi and his folk the secular congress terrorist party the same ones who caused the genocide of innocent 5,000 Sikhs in new delhi 1984. Congress and brahmin hindutva forces are one and the same to Sikhs. Rahul gandhi is a brahmin hindu by heritage from his dads side. Brahmins dont really care about religion as long as they are on top of the tree and rule over the rest with manipulation and deception its all good in their books they dont care how many innocents are oppressed or murdered in order to continue their old feudal inhumane unjust priestly class ancient rule.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No your the ignorant one.

Who spoke out against hindutva terror? It was rahul gandhi and his folk the secular congress terrorist party the same ones who caused the genocide of innocent 5,000 Sikhs in new delhi 1984. Congress and brahmin hindutva forces are one and the same to Sikhs. Rahul gandhi is a brahmin hindu by heritage from his dads side. Brahmins dont really care about religion as long as they are on top of the tree and rule over the rest with manipulation and deception its all good in their books they dont care how many innocents are oppressed or murdered in order to continue their old feudal inhumane unjust priestly class ancient rule.

yep just look at who Rahul's Dadi married a muslim
Link to post
Share on other sites

What's more, the Gandhi family roots are from Kashmiri Pandits. These are the same people who came to Guru Tej Bahadur ji, these are the people Guru Tej Bahadurji shaheeded himself for.

Nehru for some reason created the Article 370 in his state of origin and his own people have been kicked out of the valley and are living in refugee camps.

How can a Brahmin dominated country treat their own fellow brahmins so poorly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's more, the Gandhi family roots are from Kashmiri Pandits. These are the same people who came to Guru Tej Bahadur ji, these are the people Guru Tej Bahadurji shaheeded himself for.

Nehru for some reason created the Article 370 in his state of origin and his own people have been kicked out of the valley and are living in refugee camps.

How can a Brahmin dominated country treat their own fellow brahmins so poorly.

via Nehru's ancestry we have direct descendancy from Gangu ...so in reward for saving the Kashmiri pandits Gangu betrayed Guru ji's wife and grandchildren ...his namakharami drove him mad so these scum took badla on the rest of the grandchildren?

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's more, the Gandhi family roots are from Kashmiri Pandits. These are the same people who came to Guru Tej Bahadur ji, these are the people Guru Tej Bahadurji shaheeded himself for.

Nehru for some reason created the Article 370 in his state of origin and his own people have been kicked out of the valley and are living in refugee camps.

How can a Brahmin dominated country treat their own fellow brahmins so poorly.

i argee with you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • as long as no major panthic figure lays ungli on them lol  implausible at current state of affairs  we can have three sets shrimoni akali panth panj pyare of sikh sarbat khalsa along with 5 mukte and 25 mahakaali/giani singhs a mukhi of a really major dal (budha dal, taksal, akj, nkj, all the new ones lol) arent allowed to be in panj pyare or ppanj mukte  panj pyare can have more politically involved sikhs, meanwhile panj mukte be more panthic type folks like late bhai jugraj singh  one seat of panj mukte reconsidered every 2-4 years (some seats for 3, some for 4, one for 2) two of panj pyare for life till removed by 21 or more of mahakaal/giani (scholars, veterans, raagis, etc.) (i dont know how these are selected but perhaps a combination unanimously approved by 40 legislators mentioned below, they can be for life) other three chosen every 4-5 years by panj mukte  panj mukte advise panj pyare in joint session under a mukh diwan and meet diwan (chief minister of joint panj pyare/panj mukte session, secretariat minister of mahakaal assembly) who try to set up meetings and agenda and are chosen by small body of 40 legislators (need 37 or more to become) representing different parts of world and india and punjab and sampardiye that can be removed only if other 28 or more demand so  52 sewadars of sarbat khalsa enforce gurmattas under supervision of meet diwan third set of panch is akal thakt panj pyare (jathedari of akal thakt can be abolished) of which four must be most senior mahakaali singhs (the 25) and only one can be young if approved by same margin meet diwan is, this is like the jurisdiction that can remove a panj pyara anytime and de-ratify a gurmatta anytime  replaces sgpc gursikhs like baba nihal singh harianbela, giani pinderpal singh, that are admired or at least tolerated by most of panth are good candidates for panj mukte or panj pyara positions until we harvest a youth full of potential  a panj pyare can never be a panj mukta, a panj mukta can never be a panj pyare after retiring from former position mukh diwaan cannot be a former panj pyare akal thakt panj pyare cannot be former mukh diwan, and after retiring cannot serve panj pyara sarbat khalsa takes oath of restricting political activism to a certain region (perhaps pakistan punjab, punjab, haryana and maybe j&k, himachal, rajasthan) and beyond this region it confines itself to humanitarian relief, activism for sikh rights, gurudwara management, gurmatta/maryada enforcement) a politican isnt allowed from a another party to serve any position in this sarbat khalsa system but sarbat khalsa can recommend or back a panthic sikh up for a seat in the prescribed region  constitution (prescribing values of economic and relgiious freedoms, and promoting a federalist republican structure in india that candidates backed by sarbat khalsa must adhere to), code of honour (for scholars,intellectuals,officials), rehat maryada (mostly adopted from prior one) sikh intellectual council of free thought, free space for all sorts of intellectuals to discuss ideas, and a ultimate sikh reference library for all; presided by council of five elders (one chief elder) selected by mahakaali council that maintains order and intellectual integrity amongst this diaspora where intellectuals, scientists, theologicians, can freely correspond with each other and release findings (I wish bhai vir singh ji or professor puran singh ji were alive lol) sikh education front, trying to spread parchar in world, and impart worldy knowledge of stem onto youth in the north indian region described above (as our youth is behind rest of india)  revised anandpur da matta, reinforcing punjab's demand for autonomy, riparian rights, and additional territory (that we can get with help of our sikh education front working to spread sikhi in those areas and literate the poor with punjabi and other wordly stem sciences) we will harvest intellectuals, sikhs, and a stronger panth we would also need a team of lawyers to fight the cases in high court and supreme court for the matters discussed in above revision of anandpur matta, and maybe we can allign ourselves with whatever the punjab govt is at time in such legal battles against center for betterment of punjab i think i got carried away, maybe panj pyare system is better for individual gurudwaras lol although we can't have a autocracy with all the division in the panth either like we used to under diwan darbara singh ji, nawab kapur singh ji, sardar jassa singh ahluwalia  
    • really nice thread 👍 
    • idk if it is but if it is the r/sikh mod he is nice and not rude...
    • is it the same turbanator from youtube who comment on every basics of sikhi video 
    • yes bibi rajni was married off to a leper by her father for her refusal to worship him instead of raam/gopal/akaal purakh she remained firm and took her husband village to village and was now thrown into a life of poverty she was married to a disabled man with leprosy and was told by her father to deal with the consequences of not worshipping him and told her to go find her waheguru/akaal purakh/raam now she carried her leper husband in a tokra basket on her head through villages and did work like a banjaras at different households until she reached amritsar sarovar she left (probably for work), while husband went for sarovar and when he came out he was cured (some versions say sikh villagers around told him to jap waheguru as he took the dip) he held onto a twig on a tree with his pinky so he wouldnt drown as he took ishnan he was cured but bibi rajni his wife did not recognize him so there was commotion to which villagers told them to go to dhan dhan sri guru raam das ji to whom bibi rajni begged for the man in front of her to be punished thinnking he killed her husband  but guru sahib told the (husband) to show his chichi (pinky finger) which wasn't dipped in the sarovar and thus remained with leper marks which proved that he was indeed the husband (he was told by guru sahib to dip the finger and his finger was cured as well to which bibi rajni believed him) duni chand the arrogant father of bibi rajni came and asked for forgiveness, and i think he had four daughters or so and no son and thus adopted the former lepor as his son  one of my favorite sakhis from childhood 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use