Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
sikhingthetruth

Solutions To The Problem Of Interfaith Marriage

Recommended Posts

Say that if they want to get anand karaj he has to convert. Other than that, there's nothing much I can really do. I mean, she's engaged, and presumable a grown woman, so I can't really stop the marriage. I can just make sure they don't disrespect the guru.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

A solution to these types of marriages are to teach the children about sikhi. But if the parents are dumb then how can they teach their kids about sikhi? Until the parents know about sikhi these type of marriages will continue to happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A hypothetical scenario

You are upset because you just learned that your daughter is engaged to a non-Sikh man. What solutions would you undertake to unsure your daughter's fiance embraces Sikhism.

Turn ur back on her/him just as she did the guru.

The harder nonnegotiable line works better then "oh my kids don't listen to me so I'll disrespect all those sacrifices made to get me where I am and let my daughter/son sell out"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A hypothetical scenario

You are upset because you just learned that your daughter is engaged to a non-Sikh man. What solutions would you undertake to unsure your daughter's fiance embraces Sikhism.

question and let me tell you why.

First of all you give your thread a title that suggess the current problem doing the rounds in the media is because we have an aversion to 'our girls marrying white and black men'. Our intellectuals have spent the past week trying to teach our enemies, and the media who get their stories from our enemies, that they have got it wrong, i.e we are not racists. Our issue and argument is purely that such marriages must take place in a Registry Office and not in a place of worship where sacred vows are made in front of our living Guru, i.e the lie and sham that both bride and groom are Sikhs.

But tell me, how the hell we gonna get our point across to the media when people like you within don't even understand the issue ? :surrender:

I Mean seriously, just what kind of a no-brain dufus are you 'sikhingthertruth' that made you make a thread like this ? You look at 4 days worth of threads and messages on this forum explaining the Sikh stance on this issue and yet on the 5th you still decide to go down this route ? The mind boggles as to what it would take to make you understand a simple point.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

question and let me tell you why.

First of all you give your thread a title that suggess the current problem doing the rounds in the media is because we have an aversion to 'our girls marrying white and black men'. Our intellectuals have spent the past week trying to teach our enemies, and the media who get their stories from our enemies, that they have got it wrong, i.e we are not racists. Our issue and argument is purely that such marriages must take place in a Registry Office and not in a place of worship where sacred vows are made in front of our living Guru, i.e the lie and sham that both bride and groom are Sikhs.

But tell me, how the hell we gonna get our point across to the media when people like you within don't even understand the issue ? :surrender:

I Mean seriously, just what kind of a no-brain dufus are you 'sikhingthertruth' that made you make a thread like this ? You look at 4 days worth of threads and messages on this forum explaining the Sikh stance on this issue and yet on the 5th you still decide to go down this route ? The mind boggles as to what it would take to make you understand a simple point.

most worrying when people on this forum do not understand what the discussion is. IT IS NOT THE FACT THAT SIKH BOYS/GIRLS ARE MARRYING PARTNERS FROM OTHER FAITHS. IT IS ABOUT NOT CARRYING OUT BEADBI OF THE SUCH IN FROM OF GURU MAHARAJ. THERE IS ANOTHER PERSON ON ANOTHER TOPIC ON THIS SITE WHO DOES NOT UNDERSTAND EITHER. READ AND YOU WILL SEE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In terms of a possible solution to the wider issue ...

a possible idea that the Panth should look into possibly is:

1. Anand Karaj being reserved for Amritdhari Sikhs

2. A Sikh Marriage Blessing Ceremony for all Kesdhari, Sehajdhari and those marriages where a former non-Sikh spouse is not becoming Amritdhari. We should still strive to ensure education about Sikhi for such couples to realise the importance of raising their children as Sikhs so that we can do greater good for humanity via Sarbat da Bhala.

Simply blocking all those non-Amritdhari's that wish for their marriage to be blessed at a Gurdwara is a recipe for disaster that will simply alienate them and their children away from Sikhi permanently leading to the guaranteed demographic decline of Diaspora Sikh populations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

question and let me tell you why.

First of all you give your thread a title that suggess the current problem doing the rounds in the media is because we have an aversion to 'our girls marrying white and black men'. Our intellectuals have spent the past week trying to teach our enemies, and the media who get their stories from our enemies, that they have got it wrong, i.e we are not racists. Our issue and argument is purely that such marriages must take place in a Registry Office and not in a place of worship where sacred vows are made in front of our living Guru, i.e the lie and sham that both bride and groom are Sikhs.

But tell me, how the hell we gonna get our point across to the media when people like you within don't even understand the issue ? :surrender:

I Mean seriously, just what kind of a no-brain dufus are you 'sikhingthertruth' that made you make a thread like this ? You look at 4 days worth of threads and messages on this forum explaining the Sikh stance on this issue and yet on the 5th you still decide to go down this route ? The mind boggles as to what it would take to make you understand a simple point.

Why do you have 'aversion' towards your girls marrying white or black men but not torwards boys doing the same thing? This is very unfair and biased way to react to this situation. Who are your 'enemies' your intellectuals have been trying to teach? You are confusing. If a sikh boy or girl decides to marry outside of their religion or race then they should be told in perspicuous terms that they will not be allowed to have a anand karaj at their local sikh gurdwara because of the edict. They should marry at the RO to prevent the mockery of sham vows in front of the sikh living Guru. There is nothing wrong in making them do this ie marrying at the RO.

Don't worry there are plenty more 'dufus' thinking this way in this community and try explaining this to them, it is a joke.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A hypothetical scenario

You are upset because you just learned that your daughter is engaged to a non-Sikh man. What solutions would you undertake to unsure your daughter's fiance embraces Sikhism.

....................You mean like shutting the stable door after the horse has bolted?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do you have 'aversion' towards your girls marrying white or black men but not torwards boys doing the same thing? This is very unfair and biased way to react to this situation. Who are your 'enemies' your intellectuals have been trying to teach? You are confusing. If a sikh boy or girl decides to marry outside of their religion or race then they should be told in perspicuous terms that they will not be allowed to have a anand karaj at their local sikh gurdwara because of the edict. They should marry at the RO to prevent the mockery of sham vows in front of the sikh living Guru. There is nothing wrong in making them do this ie marrying at the RO.

Don't worry there are plenty more 'dufus' thinking this way in this community and try explaining this to them, it is a joke.

What ????? :blink2:

Why on earth did you address that post to me ?

Why do you have 'aversion' towards your girls marrying white or black men...

I don't. Learn to read. What I did was to tell the OP that this thread and it's silly subject matter will reinforce our enemies' wrong belief that we have aversion towards our girls marrying black and white men.

Why do you have 'aversion' towards your girls marrying white or black men but not torwards boys doing the same thing?

I don't. Why would I ? I'm a Sikh and Sikhs have complete and utter gender equality. Like I said before, learn to read and understand simple things in the English language before posting.

This is very unfair and biased way to react to this situation

The only place anyone has reacted to this situation in this way is in your own mind. You've imagined something yourself and then felt strongly enough to get on the internet and rebuke someone else for something that only happened in your own head.

You are confusing.

I'M confusing ???? :omg:

If a sikh boy or girl decides to marry outside of their religion or race then they should be told in perspicuous terms that they will not be allowed to have a anand karaj at their local sikh gurdwara because of the edict. They should marry at the RO to prevent the mockery of sham vows in front of the sikh living Guru. There is nothing wrong in making them do this ie marrying at the RO

Which is exactly the point I made in my previous message that both 'angered' and 'confused' you.

Seriously, I still don't get why you addressed your message to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hah. I appreciate you bro. I know I've said it before lol. I'll just like post a black emoji or something next time and save everybody the spiel. 
    • Yes, I get that, bro. But if we're going off what's accepted as mainstream thought on their origins, regardless of whether it's actually true, they're currently considered to be what's popularly defined as Jews. Who knows, we may in the very distant future come to recognise some other race as the true Jews.  There's one particular argument about which white anti-Semites get very angry and can't refute, is how - if we go along with the theory that Jews have infiltrated and subverted white nations - none of what Jews have achieved would be possible without white collaboration and white traitors selling out their own race. They have no answer for it, and they get very, very hostile when this argument is pointed out. They argue for white superiority on a genetic level expressed in IQ and general mental lucidity, but somehow they seem to be "tricked" into acting against their own by Jews. Doesn't sound too smart to me. Isolated cases of betrayal and deception I can buy, but wholesale subversion of entire nations for the past 300-400 years due to only Jewish tricks? Not a chance. It's white treachery and they can't acknowledge it, because it undermines their argument that they're the only race with honour and noble ideals that's above base notions of self interest of the few at the expense of the many. Anyway, I hope humanity can free itself from these desert religions of all shades. Any positive, civilising affect they've had is long gone. The rest of us are caught in the middle of their endless war, and it will prove to be fatal.
    • There is no controversy. Stop your agenda bharati saputra. 
    • There is no reason for any person having marital struggles to direct PM you.  You've barely been here a month. Don't try this c$%ap on here.
    • Well bro. There are those that say the so called jews that "infiltrated" everything never were Jews. They always were the infiltrators from the beginning of this Kalyug.  The Jacobites, true Jews have actually been persecuted by them all over the world. Not only in israel today but all over the world if you think them one and the same with european imperialism and imperialism period in known history.  That is not to say jews that fall into this category would even all know or recognize this, but I have had this verified to me in depth by Jacobites.  It is also not to say that the whole world can't respect and learn from methods of early zionist in israel or the way israel militarized themselves.  The kibutz model and mass military training of your entire people are both very laudable, replicatable systems.  It is however important to realize the degree to which israel's rise to power was fascilitated by and is in fact global white supremacy.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use