Sikh Leader To Unite All Sikhs

[chatanga]

What Sikhs need is a leader/s that can unite all Sikhs.

Given the state of the panth at the mo, what do you think are the realistic chances of that happening?

[Ranjeet01]

This needing a leader is a bit like wanting the "second coming of the messiah".

We have already have a messiah : Maharaj Ji.

Maharaj has equipped us the tools to be leaders in our own way. We have to be leaders in our own families, in our communities.

There is no silver bullet solution.

[Kira]

This needing a leader is a bit like wanting the "second coming of the messiah".

We have already have a messiah : Maharaj Ji.

Maharaj has equipped us the tools to be leaders in our own way. We have to be leaders in our own families, in our communities.

There is no silver bullet solution.

I really agree with this so much

[MisterrSingh]

Let's hope the Anti-Christ rises and brings about the destruction of the world.

[Ranjeet01]

I really agree with this so much

We all want something done but we want someone else to do it.

Reality is everyone needs to pitch in.

[genie]

Let's hope the Anti-Christ rises and brings about the destruction of the world.

That will be shiva then.

[Kira]

We all want something done but we want someone else to do it.

Reality is everyone needs to pitch in.

The Panj Pyare are the perfect representation of all the good virtues of a true leader. Dya,Dharam,Himmat,Mokham, Sahib.

When we take Amrit, we try to encompass them. The leader is within us all, we just feel the need to pass responsibility onto others.

[MisterrSingh]

That will be shiva then.

Nah, there's a Semitic one supposedly. I've been reading about him since I was a kid. Prophecies about wars between nations and religions and all that. I was semi-serious, but some of the things I've been reading on the net in the past 13-14 years seemed far fetched at the time (they were stable middle-eastern countries back then), but gradually the names of countries that I read back then are now destabilising, and I'm beginning to get a bit tetchy, lol.

[Guest Jacfsing2]

Nah, there's a Semitic one supposedly. I've been reading about him since I was a kid. Prophecies about wars between nations and religions and all that. I was semi-serious, but some of the things I've been reading on the net in the past 13-14 years seemed far fetched at the time (they were stable middle-eastern countries back then), but gradually the names of countries that I read back then are now destabilising, and I'm beginning to get a bit tetchy, lol.

Anti-Christ? What was Jesus? If an Anti-Christ did exist people would be more righteous, (Jesus was a liar and a stupid man), have you ever heard Jesus humbling saying, "Sab Te Vada Satgur Nanak Jin Kal Rakhi Meri" No! That pakhandi baba who's just like Gurbachana said, "Nobody comes to the father except through me". I'd assume the Anti-Christ would be humble and intelligent and not a freakin' liar to his own people.

[MisterrSingh]

Anti-Christ? What was Jesus? If an Anti-Christ did exist people would be more righteous, (Jesus was a liar and a stupid man), have you ever heard Jesus humbling saying, "Sab Te Vada Satgur Nanak Jin Kal Rakhi Meri" No! That pakhandi baba who's just like Gurbachana said, "Nobody comes to the father except through me". I'd assume the Anti-Christ would be humble and intelligent and not a freakin' liar to his own people.

Per your definition, someone worse than Christ, lol.

He will speak the language of peace and unification, but his true goal shall be to destroy. It's fantasy IMO, but a lot of fun.