Jump to content

How Many Indian Muslims Showed Solidarity With Sikhs For 1984 Anti-Sikh Genocide?


genie
 Share

Recommended Posts

Make me lol. Ill say what I want.

These muslims lover sikh should visit Porkistan & Afghanistan. 1000 Sikhs from Porkistan & afghanistan are seeking asylum in india yearly after modi govt changed the old policy.

The oppressed Sikhs & Hindus from these nations can live in India without any visa hassles.

Khangress govt only allowed muslims 10-20 million bangaldeshis to settle down for vote bank politics while Sikhs and Hindus asylum seekers were treated as outcast.

The haters would never find any fault in Pakistani who openly treat all kufr(Hindus, Sikhs) as third class citizens. They convert our women & then blame us intolerant with support of our liberal media.

Indian media, Khangressi darbaris pseudo intellectuals had been ranting about Hindu taliban for a month bcoz some 1-2 muslim were lynched by a local mob in law less state of Uttar pradesh which is ruled by muslim lover Mullayam yadav.

#ParisAttacks: Blame Bush

Yakub: riots

Islam: Blame Arabia

Dadri: Blame Hindus

CT0bEfWXAAAJ9hJ.png

Pic1:Indian SICKulars on Dadri

Pic2:Indian SICKulars on #ParrisAttacks

CTwfPEGXIAAp3Ty.jpgCTwfPLzWEAA-HjF.jpg

Lately, No sane and rational Sikh will blame modi for law & order situation in Punjab. Law and order is a state subject in India.

But what we saw in #london were 100 posters calling modi as killer of Sikhs! The agenda of these RW protesters are in sync with Pakistan and Anti national elements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dude you won't get any takers here and among the majority of Sikhs for your Hindutva BS. We know who our enemies are and Modi being the PM of India has joined the list. You are right he has helped Hindu and Sikh refugees from Afghanistan settle in India but we look at the larger picture. I doubt that if there were no Hindus among the Afghan refugees and just Sikhs that he would have done this just for the Sikhs. With Sikhs who want freedom from the artificial state called India, Modi won't get any kudos because Modi is just seen as a temporary gatekeeper able to decide whether Sikh refugees can come to India, in essence we we get Khalistan then any Sikh of whatever ethnic background should be free to live as long as they want in Punjab.

For the refugees from Afghanistan, the Sikhs were allowed because they were in the same situation as the Hindus. Once he did it for the Hindus then he had to include Sikhs in there as well. He also set up a resettlement package for Hindu Pandits and recently in order to win elections in Bihar he announced a 1.25 lakh crore package to Bihar and yet what has he given to Punjab where the Punjabi farmer is reeling from the worst agarian crisis that Punjab has suffered in its history? Modi has also given a financial package to J&K but nothing for Punjab.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sikhs group who funded desecration of Guru Granth sahib jee should be treated with iron hand.

Dont allow any these Right wing fanatics to take advantage of law & order like situation in Punjab.

I'd show an iron hand to Indian congress party (khangress party), Brahmin sena, Shiv Sena (punjab branch), anti-sikh Ravidassia extremists, Fudhu Neo-Akali Badal and his clan and moslem/christian missionary groups who want to kill or convert Sikhs to their ugly ideologies.

For some time now I've observed that the more Sikhs attempt to distance themselves from the Hindus and strengthen their endeavours against Hindutva, the more closely they begin to embrace Muslims, and the more open they are to the prospect of building alliances with them. Only a few years ago Sardar Simranjit Singh Mann was openly raising the slogan "Pakistan Zindabaad" after the country legitimized a Sikh Wedding Act ( which was in all likelihood calculated to stir up trouble in Indian Punjab rather than to advance the rights of Sikhs). The horrors that have befallen our people since 1947 seem to have blinded a lot of us to older savageries.

Placing our trust in any of the other religious communities of the subcontinent, with their loathsome track records of lies and broken promises is foolhardy. Who cares how many Muslims show solidarity with us? We should be more concerned about our Panthic solidarity, winning over our noncommittal brothers and sisters sitting on the fence, than with the troublesome business of attracting 'allies' from the outside, 'allies' who mean to use us as pawns in their own religious machinations.

Definitely we need to show solidarity and love for our Sikh brothers and sisters no matter which so called caste, jatha, sect, ethnicity, country they come from. I dont see much love to our Afghan, pakistani and kashmiri Sikh's at the moment its like the clownish samosa head sardars in our community are sucking up to non-sikh communities who don't give a about us than our own actual co-religionists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

those who were protesting with sikhs were azad kashmiris from uk towns. I gota respect them for standing with us against modi. But at the same time these are the same ones causing problems in the UK and targeting the sikhs in bham etc. And i doubt they would protest if it was a muslim leader coming... heck they wouldnt even protest against nawaz sharif not like hes any better is he.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use