Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Guest Viral video

Germany violent beadbi by RSS

Recommended Posts

Guest Karni Nama

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa, Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh.

Sikhs need to realise that Pakistan's ISI are a bigger threat than the RSS. Watch out for ISI agents in the Sikh community. These agents might appear Sikhs, but they are just atheistic agent provocateurs without a conscience. The ISI only wish to see Sikh 'kafirs' fight Hindu 'kafirs'. That's why they support Khalistan so much. Not to see Sikhs have their own homeland, but to cause bloodshed between Sikhs and Hindus. A true Momin (Muslim believer) will never truly help a kafir (infidel).

The torture of Guru Arjan Dev ji, the execution of Guru Tegh Bahadur ji, the stabbing of Guru Gobind Singh ji, Ahmad Shah Abdali's attack on the Harmandir sahib, etc. were all committed by Islamists, simply because we are not Muslim. Never Forget 1947 either, where the Islamists committed genocide against Sikhs and Hindus during the Partition. Being anti-non-Muslim is in the Koran and the Hadiths.

As Sikhs, we cannot hate Islam or any other religion, but we are taught to realise reality and are permitted to physically fight any Jihadi who provokes a fight. The Sufis Muslims are a peaceful spiritual people who do not care for violent Jihad. For this reason, the radical Islamists consider them heretics.

Read the Karni Nama. Sikhs will not just conquer Punjab, but the Khalsa army will invade Lahore, Kabul, Tehran, Mecca, Medina, Rome and the rest of the world. That's why we say "Raj Karega Khalsa!" which is in the Karni Nama.

And beware of Islamist propagandists posting comments under Sikh names in forums, etc. Again, their job is to incite Sikh-Hindu hatred. These Islamists will certainly suffer chaurasi lakh joon.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest london jwaan
On 2017-6-4 at 6:57 PM, Guest Karni Nama said:

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa, Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh.

Sikhs need to realise that Pakistan's ISI are a bigger threat than the RSS. Watch out for ISI agents in the Sikh community. These agents might appear Sikhs, but they are just atheistic agent provocateurs without a conscience. 

LOL yeah nice one. Quite an imagination you have there.

So when I see guys with dastars and kesh I will make the assumption that they are probably ISI.

Dumb conspiracy theory, I have to say............

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Never Forget 1947
On ‎15‎/‎06‎/‎2017 at 0:26 AM, Guest london jwaan said:

LOL yeah nice one. Quite an imagination you have there.

So when I see guys with dastars and kesh I will make the assumption that they are probably ISI.

Dumb conspiracy theory, I have to say............

Quite a bit of ignorance you have there.

Truth is usually labelled as dumb by gadaars of dharam such as yourself.

Guys with kesh and dastars are not necessarily Gursikhs, just as ISIS members are not necessarily practicing Muslims. ISI's agents come in many forms (e.g. Khalistani, Nagaland separatists, Naxilites, etc). These cheap thugs are tempted by the perks and incentives offered by their puppet masters.

Mark Twain once said: "It is easier to fool people than to convince them they've been fooled."

In case you're a jihadist posting as a non-Muslim, Pakistan Murdabad! ISI Murdabad! Jihad Murdabad!

Sikhs should support the Balochi Muslim separatists and help them fight the Pakistani army and jihadists.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Guest Never Forget 1947 said:

Quite a bit of ignorance you have there.

Truth is usually labelled as dumb by gadaars of dharam such as yourself.

Guys with kesh and dastars are not necessarily Gursikhs, just as ISIS members are not necessarily practicing Muslims. ISI's agents come in many forms (e.g. Khalistani, Nagaland separatists, Naxilites, etc). These cheap thugs are tempted by the perks and incentives offered by their puppet masters.

Mark Twain once said: "It is easier to fool people than to convince them they've been fooled."

In case you're a jihadist posting as a non-Muslim, Pakistan Murdabad! ISI Murdabad! Jihad Murdabad!

Sikhs should support the Balochi Muslim separatists and help them fight the Pakistani army and jihadists.

What if guys with kesh dhara - are Sikhs with no poiitical inclination - who just want to practice sikhi from a spiritual aspect - then what do you label them as ??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, satsangee said:

What if guys with kesh dhara - are Sikhs with no poiitical inclination - who just want to practice sikhi from a spiritual aspect - then what do you label them as ??

Sehajdhari probably. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Never Forget 1947
28 minutes ago, satsangee said:

What if guys with kesh dhara - are Sikhs with no poiitical inclination - who just want to practice sikhi from a spiritual aspect - then what do you label them as ??

Sikhs with no political inclination are "Sikhs", and Sikhs with a political inclination are also "Sikhs", UNLESS they are gulaams and chamchay of Pakistan's pro-jihad ISI, which conspires to incite non-Muslim to fight each other over territory, caste, etc. Any Sikh who is pro-ISI is like he pro-Aurangzeb. He automatically excommunicates himself from the panth, because the Sikh Panth doesn't want any gadaar Ram Rai's.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, 5akaalsingh said:

To be honest, neither Pakistan nor India want Sikhs gain any power. The reason why Pakistan supported the Sikh War of Independence (1980s-1993), was just to destabilize India. "The enemy of my enemy is my friend" heard that? ISI wanted to create a client state of Pakistan, which was not the dream of Sant Bhindrawale and other leaders. What Sikhs have to do is to prepare and wait. Sikhs should not align themselves with any of the two states. Soon, there will be a big war. That would leave a power vaccum. That would be a perfect opportunity for the Khalsa to declare independence. For now, just wait, see and prepare.

Guru Pita ji always emphasised self-rule , self-sufficiency, self-reliance : both dharams hate Guru ji's message as it undermines their central pillars of control , both have given sugand and both have repeatedly broken it why are we so stubborn to learn?? 

Pakistan wants Khalistan because they think they can invade and grab territory for themselves , nothing more or less .

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, 5akaalsingh said:

a good example is the bigotry of pakistani muslims towards sikhs in the diaspora especially in the uk. 

I think both faiths want to deliver  us a message: merge with us or die. 

Well I am not willing to join the zombie collective / hivemind jihadis

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Never Forget 1947
5 hours ago, 5akaalsingh said:

To be honest, neither Pakistan nor India want Sikhs gain any power. The reason why Pakistan supported the Sikh War of Independence (1980s-1993), was just to destabilize India. "The enemy of my enemy is my friend" heard that? ISI wanted to create a client state of Pakistan, which was not the dream of Sant Bhindrawale and other leaders. What Sikhs have to do is to prepare and wait. Sikhs should not align themselves with any of the two states. Soon, there will be a big war. That would leave a power vaccum. That would be a perfect opportunity for the Khalsa to declare independence. For now, just wait, see and prepare.

Very nicely said, brother. (y)

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

Hindus used to say Sikha de baare bajj gaye 

Now we're proving it with all these fights outside indian gurudwaras . 

Why have we as a kaum become so thick skulled ?? I don't understand ! 

I don't know who is instigating these fights in gurudwaras outside india and why the management of gurudwaras outside india is so craap and anti-sikh !!

I have no idea, but I am reminded of Gyaani Maskeen ji's book on the same topic . I am not able to find it though. He predicted mismanagement of gurudwaras outside india is not good for sikhs.

Now we're seeing results.

It's tempting to blame RSS. That might as well be true as well , but tell me is it fair to blame everything else on others ? We have failed on many fronts , be it RSS, islamists and now christians in punjab. The problem is that we have become a horribly passive and docile kaum ! 

The next time you ask for kirpan rights or dastar rights, the govts of these countries can easily pick evidence on how we're a violent community 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest dharma graduate004
On 05/07/2017 at 2:41 PM, dallysingh101 said:

Sehajdhari probably. 

In all probability, nirankaries, radha soamies or even christians converts I would say lol!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
22 hours ago, 5akaalsingh said:

To be honest, neither Pakistan nor India want Sikhs gain any power. The reason why Pakistan supported the Sikh War of Independence (1980s-1993), was just to destabilize India. "

Badi chheti akal aa gayi saanu ? :/ 

It's common sense that pak is not fond of sikhs. Quite to contrary. They just pretended to support khalistan to hurt india. Not that they like us .

Quote

Soon, there will be a big war. That would leave a power vaccum. That would be a perfect opportunity for the Khalsa to declare independence. For now, just wait, see and prepare.

It could likely happen between india and china  as I predicted in other thread. Also north korea vs US is uncertain future. I am sure even china doesn't want war as it will hurt its economy but just recently India-China standoff in sikkim is something that might trigger things. 

Lets see . Waheguru di khed , waheguru hi jaane 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • the race relations act in UK protects the jews and sikhs as races ... and the definiton I gave is the one in the new US census . Sikhs are one race as Guru ji defined us , one varna , one race - human  chill dude.
    • They are a strange bunch. This sikh lady from chandigarh was surprised that I dont drink    she said how can you be a sardar and not drink alcohol.  I really was speechless. She then asked me why I dont tie my dhari up.    Sikhs/indians from the cities are weirdos 
    • Guest jagsaw-puzzled-singh
      Thing is though nobody is allowed to do anything about the dog problem which has now reached epidemic proportions. Indian criminal has strict punishment in place for anyone that harms a stray dog......which is all well and good if youre in a civilised country where there is civic pride and the authorities take care of the problem but...right now...things have gotten so bad babies and young children are getting mauled to death on a daily basis. Nobody anywhere is taking any responsibility. Obviously i havent taken any survey or anything but from what i saw i would guess that the population of wild crazy rabid dogs in Punjab has gone up by more than 1000% in the 3 year gap of me visiting there. And thats the thing that really bothers me about Sikhs in the west....they just dont care or at least choose not to hear. Wild dogs are killing more Sikhs than the Indian government and yet nobody cares. A while ago- on my things that white people do thread i once explained that more Punjabis die from inhaling soot from their rasooi kitchen than TB and the Indian army/police genocideadded together and how a simple tube that costs about $10 could prevent those deaths. Not one person here even bothered asking me how me and my dad went about fitting them into the homes of poor people. Instead, everyone just seems content going on and on about the same thing blaming the Indian govt and Badal / Captain for all their worries. I'm not even joking....the mad dog problem in Punjab prevented me from full enjoyment of my land more than Captain and Modi ever could. Lets get our priorities right. Lets kill those kuthe !!!
    • Why did you take my words out of context?   I said: "At the end of the day, you have a haircut, so whatever you think or say is meaningless. Through your actions you have renounced the Sikh religion." This means, his actions show what he thinks and what really matters to him.     It doesn't matter if I say something nice or say something that's not nice. It doesn't matter what you think or what I think or what he thinks.   EVERY TIME he shaves, EVERY TIME he gets a haircut, he is renouncing his faith in Sikhi   He has made it clear where he stands by his actions.
    • Guest CuriousReader
      Let's say. I'm a good-hearted person who is... Christian. Not a Bible-banger, but a run of the mill average Christian man of middle socio-economic status, or an average man who is not a Sikh. I do charity, good deeds, et cetera. I have a wife and kids and I do my best to raise them. I contribute to society the best I can and have a fear of God, in the truest sense, fearing that God does not like bad deeds. Am I a Manmukh, or a Gurmukh?  part 2: Why does a man need to keep his hair fully untrimmed, yet is encouraged to trim his nails, which, by definition of keeping with Nature's law, is an example of "God's perfection in his creation"? What marks the difference in hair, and nails? And finally, why are women encouraged, at the highest point of Sikh theology (I.e. Khalsa Amritshak Sikh of the Guru) to become recluse to the world? If they have upper lip hair, or even, God forbid, beard hair... what average man, or even Sikh man of any level of Gurmukhness (apologies for the made-up word but I mean to convey level of Sikh spiritual state), what man would like to have physical relations with a woman who looks, well... like the male of the species. Naturally, men are attracted to femininity as it is opposite to a man's natural look (growing beard hair easily, naturally and encouraged to look like an adult). So where does this leave the poor Sikh female who may have a problem of growing beard hair or moustache hair, who is following the Rehat Maryada of the Khalsa which means she cannot pluck or trim the hair? Is that not equivalent to a "Sanyasi" man leaving his hair in knots and not showering? It looks unclean to a man's eyes, naturally. That is all.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use