Jump to content

If I have physical relations before getting married does it still count as a kurhet?


Guest Singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest Singh

I was just wondering this...

the rehat maryada states that one of the chaar bujjar kurhets is adultry - you have to be married to commit this. Let’s say a singh wasn’t married, took Amrit at a young age and has a physical relation with someone, does he still have to go pesh?...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/1/2018 at 10:55 PM, Guest Singh said:

I was just wondering this...

the rehat maryada states that one of the chaar bujjar kurhets is adultry - you have to be married to commit this. Let’s say a singh wasn’t married, took Amrit at a young age and has a physical relation with someone, does he still have to go pesh?...

bro
what did the Panj tell you about relationships with females ? did they tell you to have girlfriends, date , etc or did they tell you to refrain from relationships with any female before marriage then afterwards only with your wife ?

The answer is there, Panj are respresentative of Guru ji in sanchar so what they tell  you take as instruction from Guru ji , if you went against their words then I would say you need to talk to them again and take the prescribed punishment . It is not just adultry but extra marital relations i.e. outside marriage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/1/2018 at 11:55 PM, Guest Singh said:

I was just wondering this...

the rehat maryada states that one of the chaar bujjar kurhets is adultry - you have to be married to commit this. Let’s say a singh wasn’t married, took Amrit at a young age and has a physical relation with someone, does he still have to go pesh?...

Non marital physical relations are forbidden, as per Maharaj’s Mukti Nama. Maharajh Ji says, that anyone having pre marital or extra marital physical relations, is no Sikh of mine...

WHeguru...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I have physical relations before getting married does it still count as a kurhet?

It is  definetely bujjar kurhet, whether before, during, or after marriage, having physical relations with other than one´s spouse only.

It is quite evident that as per the present picture of the world in general, "kaam" is viewed as something attractive and harmless.

It is the most powerful vikar through which even devtays, rishis, have fallen due  to its influence on them.

It is not easy to stay away from its tentacles, as at all levels in our daily lives, we see it moving around us, in scenes, such as newspapers, jokes,  conversations, magazines, televison, films,  messages, etc.

But if we are  true sikhs, we should be so much absorbed in His bhakti/simran/Gurbani/keertan, katha, paath, at all times, that this maya, and her servants vikars, dare not come near us.

Ekas(Wahiguru) bin sabh dandh hae.

Stay blessed.

Sat Sree Akal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ignore the translation, the exact rehat is not to do "par istree da sang", meaning not to have sexual relations with a woman that is not yours/someone else's. The only way that a woman can be considered yours and not "par istree" is if you have had Anand karaj to her. So yes sex with anyone that is not your wife (whether you are married or not) is a bajjar kurehit. The moment this has taken place, a person ceases to be a Sikh and Guru Sahib's hand is no longer on that person's head. Such a person no longer has any rishta with Guru Sahib any more and they must confess this bajjar kurehit to the Panj pyare, accept and carry out the punishment given to them and re-receive Amrit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
Guest Anonymous

I’m just a Sahajdhari Sikh not an Amritdhari, I dated few guys long back before I got married & indulged into several times physical relations with few,  at different phase of life during getting to know them. Till finally I dated the guy who meant to be my present husband & even then we had several pre-maritial intimacy too before we finally got married. I know those acts were absolutely wrong  no matter in which religions we are & I feel bad sometimes when I think back.  And today only I cross through this topic about Pesh. I have no idea what that means till I read bit today. I have shallow knowledge of Sikhi but I still try to practise Nitnem more. So what shall I do to compensate my past sins? Even for my husband too,  if he has done with me or any others in his past? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An amritdhari has to pesh when he/she commits a bujjer kurehit. You dont uave to worry about that

even when/if you take amrit you dont have to divulge your past actions

other than that, your personal feelings or guilt is between you and maharaj. Continue building your jeevan, nitnem and do ardas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/6/2020 at 9:55 PM, Guest Anonymous said:

I’m just a Sahajdhari Sikh not an Amritdhari, I dated few guys long back before I got married & indulged into several times physical relations with few,  at different phase of life during getting to know them. Till finally I dated the guy who meant to be my present husband & even then we had several pre-maritial intimacy too before we finally got married. I know those acts were absolutely wrong  no matter in which religions we are & I feel bad sometimes when I think back.  And today only I cross through this topic about Pesh. I have no idea what that means till I read bit today. I have shallow knowledge of Sikhi but I still try to practise Nitnem more. So what shall I do to compensate my past sins? Even for my husband too,  if he has done with me or any others in his past? 

Well theres obviously no going back now. What you can do is make your nitnem solid and do it everyday   and also do waheguru simran, you can do simran while working, cooking etc

Waheguru made you a sikh in this life so it's your duty to fulfill that. Waheguru is our father  and we must obey his hukham   that's the purpose of our life 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/1/2018 at 11:55 PM, Guest Singh said:

I was just wondering this...

the rehat maryada states that one of the chaar bujjar kurhets is adultry - you have to be married to commit this. Let’s say a singh wasn’t married, took Amrit at a young age and has a physical relation with someone, does he still have to go pesh?...

You have to go for pesh if you have a relationship outside marriage. That basically means that having a boyfriend/girlfriend relationship is a kuhrehit. It’s different to finding someone to marry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use