Jump to content

HOLLYWOOD MOVIE FEATURING A SIKH !!


harjinder
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

a couple of other actos have their head covered, maybe he could have just done that?

Veerji then they would have said hes wearing a hat or a touque... it just never ends wacko.gif

grin.gif <-- hey he kinda looks like this doesnt he??? :|

Fateh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although Mann KAum liye Qurban defo has a point, it would be a lto easier if he wore a PAtka or sometihng and there was a scene of two with him Nanga sir - would due

but from the story it seems it's mostly underwater tongue.gif

although we should give a big hadn of pplaud to him..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think some people have already pointed this out, but this movie is really a blessing for Sikhs in America.

Some of the positive points :

1) Americans can see a FULL sardar….not a half sardar or partial sardar.

2) Americans can see what is actually under the turban. They will learn the reason why Sikhs wear a turban ( the practical side). Americans will see that Sikhs keep uncut hair and they need a turban to cover it.

3) We can start building knowledge currency. “What’s a Sikh dude?” answer: “Remember that movie…”

4) Hollywood will be the best way to counter Bollywood nonsense. When Americans see a Sikh…THEY WILL REMEMBER! We can break away from the stereotype that Americans have of Indians as being “ curry eating, funny talking, hindus”. Americans will see us distinct from being just Indians.

5) This will open the door for more roles with Sikhs…even if it’s just for the “exotic” factor.

We have organizations like SMART, Sikh Coalition, etc whp are engaged in educating Americans. Just think what this movie will do for exposure. It will at least make Americans curious about us.

Plus, Sikhs don’t have to wear a Turban all the time. If the situation requires, a Sikh can take it off.

Like when bathing….being in WATER.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree on both sides. seeing sikh bare head is also not a good sight, but hey that will save us from lotsss of questions from ppls asking what's inside the turban and at least they will know that its HAIR and so on. But still its kinda touching topic..

But it's better step taken by hollywood of having a real sardar, maybe in future they will improve a lot. Look at English patient, a mona hindu guy did the role of Sikh, now we have a sikh doing the role of sikh :wub: I think it's good and it's wayyy better than what bollywood do in the category of sikh roles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i say more power to him :TH:

after decades of seeing skanky mumbai-an actors with dead rodents strapped to their faces acting like sikhs are nothing but dhol-playing drunks, terrorists & criminals that also do a bit of idol worship when they get some spare time from their dhol-playing, drinking, terrorism and crime-

this is GOOD to see

:wub: ))))

Link to comment
Share on other sites

guys drop the political correctness the guys got kesh and dhari but where is his dastar????  he looks silly in the second picture holding a video camera with his gotee on his head , what a wasted oppurtunity.

If you people slamming the guy for not wearing a turban in a couple scenes haven't noticed, this movie is about DEEP SEA DIVERS, leave it to Sikhs to immediately go after the faults of one gursikhs accomplishments even when he's not doing anything wrong, how can you go deep sea diving with a full keski?!?! ridiculous. nonono.gif

its not ridiculous... u can still wear a ramal or patka to keep your hair covered...

...also we should reserve judgement until we actually see the movie, it could be great...

...but if it has seens with him drinking, and going out with girls etc, it wont be great...

but until we see it, we shouldnt knock it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Definitely the Guru Sahibs would be a heavier Scriptures to handle. Dasam Granth is more towards Bir Rass, Guru Gobind Singh showed his Greatness (of course, they would never say this) by separating his own Baania.  And the BIGGEST test of all?? Do we try and read Dasam Granth, Understand n show respect like we do to SGGS? Or... Do we QUESTION it? Guru Gobind Singh Ji is testing us. 
    • My wife will be going for an MRI scan next week but her Kara won’t physically come off.  Is there any way the mri scan can be done with the Kara still on?  The alternative is we will have to try to saw it off before the scan.  
    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use