Dealing with an angry wife

[Ranjeet01]

41 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

I can see the logic behind it (basically, the state has its sword of Damocles hanging precariously over the head of the male members of the family in order to threaten them into good behaviour and compliance), but legislation that holds so much potential for abuse is amazingly short sighted. I suppose certain types of societies require a radical approach to induce their populations into behaving themselves. Another victory for the feminists, lmao. 

The compliance of good behaviour  is in the wrong place.

The majority of the abuse for daughter -in-laws will be instigated by her mother-in-laws and sister-in-laws.

A lot of these issues are women-on-women .

A cruel daughter-in-law can cause problems for the male members of her-in laws.

This means that women can get away with anything and it is the men's responsibility. 

Potential scenario would be if a mother-in-law causes problem for her daughter-in-law then the men have to clamp down on her misbehavior because he will be financially liable.

He will have to assert his authority which again would be seen as abuse. 

Is it any wonder men won't do anything and just want a quiet life.

There will be consequences. 

[MisterrSingh]

1 hour ago, Ranjeet01 said:

The compliance of good behaviour  is in the wrong place.

The majority of the abuse for daughter -in-laws will be instigated by her mother-in-laws and sister-in-laws.

A lot of these issues are women-on-women .

A cruel daughter-in-law can cause problems for the male members of her-in laws.

This means that women can get away with anything and it is the men's responsibility. 

Potential scenario would be if a mother-in-law causes problem for her daughter-in-law then the men have to clamp down on her misbehavior because he will be financially liable.

He will have to assert his authority which again would be seen as abuse. 

Is it any wonder men won't do anything and just want a quiet life.

There will be consequences. 

The sexual assault and rape clampdown was dead-on the correct thing to do on the part of Indian lawmakers. This proposed legislation seems like a logistical nightmare. It's unworkable to the point where it seems like a move to virtue signal to the West about India's emerging progressive social conscience, and to appease a growing section of Indian society that's in tune with Western leftist values as it pertains to gender politics. I'm not sure how such a policy will fly with what I assume is Modi's traditionally minded and conservative support base. I guess even in modern Indian politics the pretence of Left and Right wings is a pantomime for the masses, and the only genuine path that ensures prosperity, lol, is one of progressive globalism. The authoritarian, patriotic rhetoric most of Indian society seems to have swallowed since Modi became leader is a slick marketing and psychological trick. Fascinating times ahead for Bharat.

[Ranjeet01]

8 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

The sexual assault and rape clampdown was dead-on the correct thing to do on the part of Indian lawmakers. This proposed legislation seems like a logistical nightmare. It's unworkable to the point where it seems like a move to virtue signal to the West about India's emerging progressive social conscience, and to appease a growing section of Indian society that's in tune with Western leftist values as it pertains to gender politics. I'm not sure how such a policy will fly with what I assume is Modi's traditionally minded and conservative support base. I guess even in modern Indian politics the pretence of Left and Right wings is a pantomime for the masses, and the only genuine path that ensures prosperity, lol, is one of progressive globalism. The authoritarian, patriotic rhetoric most of Indian society seems to have swallowed since Modi became leader is a slick marketing and psychological trick. Fascinating times ahead for Bharat.

This particular legislation (it seems)has been designed to break down extended families into nuclear families. 

I think that is the goal.

[MisterrSingh]

1 hour ago, Ranjeet01 said:

This particular legislation (it seems)has been designed to break down extended families into nuclear families. 

I think that is the goal.

Great shout.