Jump to content

Transitioning from transliteration to reading Gurmukhi


Redoptics
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 6/20/2019 at 7:20 AM, dallysingh101 said:

a VERY academic paper by Arvind Mandair on the topic of modern 'Sikh theology' which emerged as a result of the colonial encounter

Do you have a link?

I should refrain from commenting until I read it, but is it possible that the missionaries are a direct consequence of the British? That all the stuff they are saying is just to please the British Sahib, who isn't even around anymore?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, BhForce said:

Do you have a link?

I should refrain from commenting until I read it, but is it possible that the missionaries are a direct consequence of the British? That all the stuff they are saying is just to please the British Sahib, who isn't even around anymore?

I think it is more about a shift in contextualisation that was brought about by the brits. It's perfectly understandable as a consequence of colonisation, but the BIG question is whether it is a smart thing to do (even more so, as you've alluded to), when we've thrown off that subjugation. Sure, apply some western constructs to see what we get, but if we are oblivious to the very fact that what we are doing is essentially introducing major shifts and outside ideas to original Sikh thinking, then we are being very dimwitted. Then we have a colonisation of the mind itself - regardless of the physical presence of those that caused this.

 

Will try and find that link for you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, BhForce said:

Do you have a link?

I should refrain from commenting until I read it, but is it possible that the missionaries are a direct consequence of the British? That all the stuff they are saying is just to please the British Sahib, who isn't even around anymore?

It's obvious that the missionaries are a direct result of this in my opinion. It's a weird (And very subtle) assimilation of victorian era, protestant, racialised and even prudish thinking (amongst many things). This explains why caste is going on stronger than ever (notice this is most strong within the community to whom brits most successfully introduced their racialised theories and depended upon for their colonial misadventures abroad). Also notice how this externally introduced victorian era prudery (which interestingly goray themselves have since outright rejected - go out on any Friday/Saturday night and see for yourself) is the direct cause of apnay looking upon Charitrio  Pakyaan with suspicious and even contemptuous eyes (as it now seems ashleel to them). There is an honest, earthy 'realness' to the original Sikh perceptions of human nature which have gone amongst the masses and has been replaced by prudery. I believe this naivety and coyness played a part in why so many 'religious' conservative apnay  turned a blind eye to all the grooming issue that was and is going on. There was a political and military confidence that was attacked too. 

I don't think the missionaries are trying to please the brits, they just can't see outside of the framework they've inherited, and actually believe what they are pushing is the real thing. This bit will be very controversial - but maybe this is the logical conclusion to the Singh Sabha lehar? They might have had real good intentions, but ultimately when we introduce these things in - they take on a life of their own with unforeseeable long term consequences. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

It's obvious that the missionaries are a direct result of this in my opinion. It's a weird (And very subtle) assimilation of victorian era, protestant, racialised and even prudish thinking (amongst many things). This explains why caste is going on stronger than ever (notice this is most strong within the community to whom brits most successfully introduced their racialised theories and depended upon for their colonial misadventures abroad). Also notice how this externally introduced victorian era prudery (which interestingly goray themselves have since outright rejected - go out on any Friday/Saturday night and see for yourself) is the direct cause of apnay looking upon Charitrio  Pakyaan with suspicious and even contemptuous eyes (as it now seems ashleel to them). There is an honest, earthy 'realness' to the original Sikh perceptions of human nature which have gone amongst the masses and has been replaced by prudery. I believe this naivety and coyness played a part in why so many 'religious' conservative apnay  turned a blind eye to all the grooming issue that was and is going on. There was a political and military confidence that was attacked too. 

I don't think the missionaries are trying to please the brits, they just can't see outside of the framework they've inherited, and actually believe what they are pushing is the real thing. This bit will be very controversial - but maybe this is the logical conclusion to the Singh Sabha lehar? They might have had real good intentions, but ultimately when we introduce these things in - they take on a life of their own with unforeseeable long term consequences. 

The main reason why caste was re introduced during the British raj period is because that is the only method by which they could control such a mass of people using the brahnwaad soch to further their own agenda, plus the brahmins were quite willing to increase their control of society . These missionaries have been bitten by the all western approach to doing analysis of our faith's scriptures and history that 'scientifically provable' is the hallmark of the truth.  They were created to become a class of 'sikh intelllectuals' to poke holes in everything sikh an agenda which suited both delhi hukamats: british and 'hindu dominant'

Singh Sabha lehar started with great intent but was also infiltrated with disrupters of sikhi aims

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There is nothing wrong with starched pagg. The Guru is omniscient (all-knowing). You think he doesn't know our intentions? If somebody wears a starched pagg but still respects it as a crown then whats wrong with that? People think that starch automatically makes people lose their respect for their pagg but thats just false.  And dont make this a caste thing I’m Rajput Jatt sikh (not an ounce of Tarkhan or anything else) and we all starch our INDIAN style punjabi paggs (patiala shahi), but respect them as our crowns and our literal lives. A respected starch pagg is better by far than a freshly tied one which people just disrespect. And people forget that these are not ready made or pre-tied turbans. You still tie them initially but just of course not as frequently. What’s wrong with that?  When your relationship is that strong with the Guru then you know what he means. Speak to him directly, explain why and ask him if it’s okay. Btw I know people who dont starch their turbans (all punjabi/morni style btw) and they just wear it again the next day without tying it if they have toed it really nicely the day before. 😂 You cant really even tell who had tied it and who just wore it again without starch. At least we’re open about it. Bhul chuk maaf    
    • Its called a “fifty” becuase when Singhs were fighting in the British army, they would recieve an 8 metre pagg, with a cour four base, because the base layer was half (50%) of the main turban, it’s called a fifty. The practise of tying a keski under your main one is now seen as pretty weird (except for a patka), but the small coloured strip inder the pagg is still used as a fashion statement since its pretty visually appealing. And so, people now just tie a small little “kung-fu strip” sort of thing under their pagg to imitate that effect.
    • Found how to do it. For anybody else wondering, heres how. No one even helped me btw. So much for Guru Ji’s lhalsa always ready to help (and having their Singhs’ backs smh). (Notes: Aim to do this on a hot summer’s day, and dedicate a full day to this, since you only have to do this once every 4 months at least (normally the turban will stay in shape until you wish to untie it and physically pull it open again). This helps it to dry faster, since you have to starch it, HALF DRY IT, pooni it, tie it and then wear it for around four hours for the rest of it to dry, all in the same day. It’s a one day process but it serves you for months). This works for both the UK/Kenyan style (starch is best for this style) as well as the normal Punjabi paghs (such as Patiala shahi, wattan wali and morni paghs). Not sure about dumallas though. Probably not . Pagg Starch: 1) Boil 6 cups of water in a saucepan on low heat (always low heat) 2) Seperately dissolve 4 tablespoons of maida (all purpose flower) with a little water until it is 100% smooth.  You could also use rice or corn starch. Add more water if it is not a smooth liquid 3) Once completely smooth, pour this mixture through a strainer (to make it even smoother) into the boiling water. 4) Now continuously stir it until it goes completely see through. Keep on stirring it on the low heat until it goes totally transparent (it can take a little while to cook, but the pagg will last you for months!) It will at become a thick paste first, but keep stirring until it becomes see through and thinner.    5) Once it’s transparent, pour the starch (again through a strainer) into a big enough, clean bucket to cool down. 6) Once cool, take a clean, dry turban and completely and mix it in with the starch for around 5 minutes. Make sure that it is all evenly and completely soaked and wet with the starch. (Most people use mal-mal material, but I use full voile and I have used Rubia too. They’re all fine. Maybe use Rubin for smaller turbans and mal mal for larger ones) 7) Leave it out in the sun to HALF DRY ONLY!!!!!!! (Don’t ever let your starched turban fully dry before you tie it. If you do, then you will have to spray/ sprinkle water on it which will weaken the starch and ruin the turban) ONLY HALF DRY THE TURBAN IN THE SUN!!! 😎 Once HALF DRY ONLY take the now semi damp turban, and fold/pooni and then tie it like normal (straight on your head, with no base layer such as a Keski or patka underneath). Leave it on your head for around 4 hours just to fully dry and it will be ready and set for months now. Like I said, do try to tie your dastar every day, but if you can’t or really don’t want to, I hope this helps! Like I said this works on both the traditional Punjabi/Indian style paggs, and the more recent UK/Kenyan style paggs. It does for my morni pagg, but the first larr slips up in to the pagg. This is normal dw. Wjkk, Wjkf
    • I guess easier ways of learning have taken precedence. There are so many Youtube channels and podcasts available that people are more ready to listen for knowledge at their own leisure. There are so many great kathas available online that take months to listen, so that people may not really get the time to come here and write.
    • *Bump The current conflict (w/ Iran getting involved) is being orchestrated by a 3rd party in my opinion. We all are going to blame the Jewish community (how they run the banks, how they are brutal and etc.) but they have a point in this conflict.  As soon as people start finding about the truth that's when the real movement will begin. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use