Jump to content

UP incident : Sikh beaten and dragged by kes , made to run , turban thrown in sewer .


Guest
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

 

Even if one reasons he did something wrong to deserve a beating, I don't see a justification to remove his turban and drag by Kes. But I see its increasingly becoming common in arguments, that sikh guy's turban is removed from head, which honestly as we all turbaned men can agree is akin to stripping someone naked. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, AjeetSingh2019 said:

 

 

Even if one reasons he did something wrong to deserve a beating, I don't see a justification to remove his turban and drag by Kes. But I see its increasingly becoming common in arguments, that sikh guy's turban is removed from head, which honestly as we all turbaned men can agree is akin to stripping someone naked. 

 

Our Sikh brothers in states other than Punjab need to start retaliating with severe force or face being humiliated like this on a daily bases.  We all saw the Nihung Singh recently who gave the Punjab Police a stern reply.  The message this sends out to the rest of the skinny Indians is ‘Singhs have gone soft’.  Wherever Sikhs are outnumbered outsider of Punjab, the need to form small Jathe made of young fearless Singhs who carry out punishment missions against those who are identified in the humiliation of articles of faith.  Then this will stop!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, TigerForce1 said:

Our Sikh brothers in states other than Punjab need to start retaliating with severe force or face being humiliated like this on a daily bases.  We all saw the Nihung Singh recently who gave the Punjab Police a stern reply.  The message this sends out to the rest of the skinny Indians is ‘Singhs have gone soft’.  Wherever Sikhs are outnumbered outsider of Punjab, the need to form small Jathe made of young fearless Singhs who carry out punishment missions against those who are identified in the humiliation of articles of faith.  Then this will stop!

The thing about directly attacking , like in case of nihang, is that then the state machinery starts tagging you as criminals and lawless and state machinery is unleashed on you.

honestly its a catch-22 situation, and I don't see any easy solution to this 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AjeetSingh2019 said:

The thing about directly attacking , like in case of nihang, is that then the state machinery starts tagging you as criminals and lawless and state machinery is unleashed on you.

honestly its a catch-22 situation, and I don't see any easy solution to this 

Which is where the sikh leadership and sikh media needs to speak up on behalf of Sikhs. If SGPC and akali dali are sold out then new institutions must be raised to give Sikhs that voice and protection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, AjeetSingh2019 said:

The thing about directly attacking , like in case of nihang, is that then the state machinery starts tagging you as criminals and lawless and state machinery is unleashed on you.

honestly its a catch-22 situation, and I don't see any easy solution to this 

Direct action gets instant results and deters others from getting the same idea. No one is going to save you and living up to the states expectation of being labelled law abiding and peaceful, will only empower other skinny bayeh to have a go at Singhs outside of Punjab.  There was a time when people used fear Sardars now you’ve got these malnourished bayeh chasing Singhs.  It’s time to reclaim the image. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Jonny101 said:

See, it's when Hindus do stuff like this that pushes Sikhs closer to Muslims. Add to this the fact the hundreds of Sikh families who settled in UP after partition are now being uprooted again by the UP government. That's why Sikhs start to get back at Hindus by supporting their enemies i.e. Kashmiris, Rohingyas, anti CAA protestors.

idolatry has killed Hindus spiritually. Gurbani calls them blind.

they hv lost their own dignity and they totally attack the dignity of their opponent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@proactive ...100% agree with you... Buddhists have been doing this for some time.

https://www.irishtimes.com/news/a-million-low-caste-hindus-to-convert-to-buddhism-1.334983

https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/04/dalit-buddhism-conversion-india-modi/557570/

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/oct/13/religion.india

Shame on ourselves that 'Jatt' culture has completely overshadowed Sikhi which for all castes to follow. This is why christian missionary have taken over India. I remember Bhai Jagraj Singh mentioned this many times to preach to lower castes to come into Sikhi, and then Khalsa will take over.  Punjabi Jatt are just as bad as Hindu Bahmans now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use