Jump to content

Kalyug: Mami having affair with nephew


puzzled
 Share

Recommended Posts

Jokes aside, this highlights a phenomenon that I thought wasn't related to a wider trend, but on second thoughts I think there's definitely some substance to it. 

Sikh guys who migrated to the West in the early to mid 00s are now (and have been for a few years) returning to their homes after securing a long-term visa, and they're now getting married.

The problem is this: the guys themselves are in their very late 30s or early to mid 40s in most cases, but on returning to their ancestral homes they seem to be picking wives for themselves from the early to mid-20s demographic. The age gap is, in some cases, 13 or 14 years.

Normally in a socially, morally conservative and respectable society, this age disparity wouldn't be a problem (as proven through historical precedent), but with the current degradation of cultural and moral norms, it's natural that these young women are going to be attracted (and in some cases have already had numerous partners) to guys in their own age bracket.

The core issue on the part of the male returning home for a wife is rooted in ego. He assumes that because he has the visa - and therefore a guaranteed golden ticket by which to attract the so-called cream of the female crop - the age gap will not prove to be problematic. Unfortunately for him, what he neglects to take into account is the fact that the Punjabi girls that he considers to be his for the taking, are biologically attracted to males of her own age regardless of what tempting inducements the returning champion has at his disposal to secure a rishta.

Of course, the returning male also assumes that because he's a relatively recent immigrant (and not, for example, a foreign-born "Beletiya" etc) he won't get betrayed because he's still basically part of the "tribe" in a cultural sense albeit one who had to depart for a while to secure a future for himself. Again, sadly for him, that departure is enough to create distance where he IS considered as the "other."

It's very interesting. I've seen a few cases of these older Punjabi / young Punjaban in the previous few months but I wasn't quite getting what was going on. Now I get it, and it's quite sad. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think as beletiya we were always led to believe that people from Punjab had higher standards of behaviour despite their higher levels of cunning. 

We have been told by our elders that the gorah is immoral and have no standards.

We kind of hold people from Punjab on a pedestal and high esteem but that pedestal and respect is disappearing and it has come to point where the beletiya hold these people with contempt and disgust. 

In some ways these people are worse than goreh. They have less shame in many regards.

How we can call Punjab "back home" at this moment of time is beyond me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ranjeet01 said:

I think as beletiya we were always led to believe that people from Punjab had higher standards of behaviour despite their higher levels of cunning. 

We have been told by our elders that the gorah is immoral and have no standards.

We kind of hold people from Punjab on a pedestal and high esteem but that pedestal and respect is disappearing and it has come to point where the beletiya hold these people with contempt and disgust. 

In some ways these people are worse than goreh. They have less shame in many regards.

How we can call Punjab "back home" at this moment of time is beyond me.

It's very subtle but they seem to resent us purely because of the accident of us being born overseas. I'd understand if the person in question is a clown, but not so much if he or she are fairly decent and respectable.

There's a palpable yet very subtle hostility even between cousins from the same family when Beletiyeh return to their family home on an excursion. This type of mentality is a telltale sign of a primitive intellect, and it's those people who require minimal prodding to turn into actual and dangerous threats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

It's very subtle but they seem to resent us purely because of the accident of us being born overseas. I'd understand if the person in question is a clown, but not so much if he or she are fairly decent and respectable.

There's a palpable yet very subtle hostility even between cousins from the same family when Beletiyeh return to their family home on an excursion. This type of mentality is a telltale sign of a primitive intellect, and it's those people who require minimal prodding to turn into actual and dangerous threats.

They definitely have resentment.

I have heard some of this underlying remarks which suggest this, " Tu te sirf baharo  aiya vah "

But the "incest " like thing gets to me and they have no shame.

Where as we have grown up with goreh's, " bonk them, <banned word filter activated> that, dump them to get off with that one!"

Our elders need to be questioned. How can they bring us up to feel inferior to people from Punjab when the people are this way.

Was Punjab always this way and were they b.s'ing all along? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

They definitely have resentment.

I have heard some of this underlying remarks which suggest this, " Tu te sirf baharo  aiya vah "

But the "incest " like thing gets to me and they have no shame.

Where as we have grown up with goreh's, " bonk them, <banned word filter activated> that, dump them to get off with that one!"

Our elders need to be questioned. How can they bring us up to feel inferior to people from Punjab when the people are this way.

Was Punjab always this way and were they b.s'ing all along? 

I mentioned this Mami-Bhanja situation to my mum as obliquely as I could manage it, lol, and to my surprise she said there's always been whispers of this kind of gandh when she was growing up during her childhood / teens, which was throughout the 70s. I'm shocked, tbh. Another common sordid interaction is the Bhua's Son and Mama's Daughter. This is truly taboo stuff. Disgusting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use