Jump to content

Muslim criminal aligned to IS stabbed two on released.


Recommended Posts

Dude was clearly a mental case who even warned the authorities about himself. They're to blame as much as he is. He should have been in a padded room. 

People don't like their tax dollars helping people, just blowing them up or punishing them. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, GurjantGnostic said:

 

People don't like their tax dollars helping people, just blowing them up or punishing them. 

Hmm, there is already a significant disproportionately high Muslim population in UK prisons. Should we be spending more on them ?

 

image.thumb.png.a043fddf2deec3a4b0886a9a4a5021ef.png 

Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Premi5 said:

Hmm, there is already a significant disproportionately high Muslim population in UK prisons. Should we be spending more on them ?

 

image.thumb.png.a043fddf2deec3a4b0886a9a4a5021ef.png 

Yes. And not treating their mental illness and releasing them to stab people does nothing to address your problem. 

My point is if your tax dollars are going to be used, which they are, why not shift some of those funds to treating the mentally ill ones. And it's worth every penny no matter where you keep someone if it prevents them stabbing people which they made clear they would. 

Even if you want to just incarcerate people you can't be stingy and release them. You have to keep them incarcerated. That's like saving a few dollars by cutting off the electricity to the plant. It defeats the whole purpose. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

Yes. And not treating their mental illness and releasing them to stab people does nothing to address your problem. 

My point is if your tax dollars are going to be used, which they are, why not shift some of those funds to treating the mentally ill ones. And it's worth every penny no matter where you keep someone if it prevents them stabbing people which they made clear they would. 

Even if you want to just incarcerate people you can't be stingy and release them. You have to keep them incarcerated. That's like saving a few dollars by cutting off the electricity to the plant. It defeats the whole purpose. 

It's not a mental illness. It's their ideology that is to blame. Otherwise how can 25% of the Muslim prison population be deemed to be mentally ill without going to the source of the problem. And this is worldwide. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/6/2021 at 10:57 AM, Suchi said:

It's not a mental illness. It's their ideology that is to blame. Otherwise how can 25% of the Muslim prison population be deemed to be mentally ill without going to the source of the problem. And this is worldwide. 

Well whoever enters the system should be evaluated, and however many of these guys fail the test to be able to differentiate between innocent civilians and whoever a legitimate person to reeist or confront is, then keep em locked up. I mean brittain already has to decide how long to keep certain people incarcerated and where for how much money and to what end result. I don't have any ponies in that race really. Other than to say it's clearly worth the money not to release that guy. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/6/2021 at 10:02 AM, Premi5 said:

Hmm, there is already a significant disproportionately high Muslim population in UK prisons. Should we be spending more on them ?

 

image.thumb.png.a043fddf2deec3a4b0886a9a4a5021ef.png 

I mean what do you suggest, deportation, death sentences?

There's one place any healthy nation can't be stingy and that's paying healthily for mental health and prison services, run ethically, at a cost and not for profit. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

Well whoever enters the system should be evaluated, and however many of these guys fail the test to be able to differentiate between innocent civilians and whoever a legitimate person to reeist or confront is, then keep em locked up. I mean brittain already has to decide how long to keep certain people incarcerated and where for how much money and to what end result. I don't have any ponies in that race really. Other than to say it's clearly worth the money not to release that guy. 

From what we are seeing currently Britain has no interest in 'helping' such people from this religion. Worldwide no media is even prepared to publish their crimes which tells us that this must be part of an agenda.  

It is this we need to face. 

Furthermore I have serious doubts that anyone can be rehabilitated if they have such entrenched views from early childhood.  Only mind control torture may work but in public  they claim that is illegal though that is what the AI system is essentially.  It could be he was 'forced' to enact his words which gave the authorities to deal with him as they could. So in line with Karmic law. But is this the right way forward or are there better ways? 

Maybe the judge wanted to avoid further risk of injury to other prisoners or even medical staff. From this point of view he seems to have done the best for those working in the system. In reality he deserved solitary confinement but that may have had political implications and accusations of human rights abuses. So what were the other options. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, GurjantGnostic said:

I mean what do you suggest, deportation, death sentences?

There's one place any healthy nation can't be stingy and that's paying healthily for mental health and prison services, run ethically, at a cost and not for profit. 

 

Deportation would be a good idea where applicable. 

I don't agree with death sentence

The problem to me is that Islamic fundamentalists believe they are superior to others, that others are 'kafir' so they cannot be trusted even if 'rehabilitated'

Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Premi5 said:

Deportation would be a good idea where applicable. 

I don't agree with death sentence

The problem to me is that Islamic fundamentalists believe they are superior to others, that others are 'kafir' so they cannot be trusted even if 'rehabilitated'

Doesn't that apply to the brittish themselves?

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, GurjantGnostic said:

Doesn't that apply to the brittish themselves?

Not to the extent that Muslims do, IMO. We are always 'kafir' in Muslim eyes from my experience. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Do you think our guys in the West are as prone to the dramatics as resorting to suicide? I personally think they've thrown in the towel; a quiet acceptance of defeat which is mostly attributable to the broader culture that has compounded the idea that it's toxic for a man to question a lady about her antics. 
    • If he's just going to kill himself on finding that out, that's unfortunate but fair enough. But don't start killing other people as well, including the b1tch. 
    • This is the absolute crux of the matter; to find a girl who's pretty enough to get the lad hot and bothered BUT not too pretty that her attractiveness has made her a target for other lads from the moment, as they say in Punjabi, her jawani char gayi in her mid-teens onwards. Before the undercover brahmgyanis chime in about prioritising kamayi and Gurmukh values, for those of our people who don't float around in their own little Satyug that keeps the rest of the Kalyugi world out (a bit like Trump's non-existent wall), these are valid considerations that should be looked at in detail for the rank-and-file people of our community. If the guy himself is between the 4-7 range of attractiveness, he needs to look for a girl within the same range. BUT Punjabi guys (and men in general) over-estimate their physical appeal. A man, more than anyone, has a tendency to inflate his own sense of being. He finds it very difficult to process that he may not be what he thinks he is. A guy in this 4-7 range (which is the vast majority of males on the planet) going after a 9 or 10 girl is living in cloud-cuckoo land if he thinks even a typically middle-class, middle-income job (£30-60k) is going to keep a top-tier girl placated for the next 40-50 years of her life (or at least until she lets her self go or hits the menopause depending on what comes first. Even then her appeal to men may fade, but her aadataa -- habits -- will be nigh on set in stone. If they're rotten since decades eariler, the guy is in for trouble). I'd go as far to say that even a multi-millionaire would need to be on-top of his game from the day he's married to the day he drops dead in order to keep a 9 or 10 as his wife. Today, more than ever, a girl's history counts so much. From what I've seen, the majority of apne guys live in a world that is detached from reality. They may consider themselves street-smart and worldly, but in many respects their understanding of the world is, IMO, based on an inaccurate simulation of a wider culture they don't truly understand. As such, those blind-spots is where they end up being blind-sided by the unforeseen. Then you've got to figure out whether her jawani had indeed gone to her head quite a while ago, or if she's been sensible with it. The answer to this question, IMO, comes IN PART from studying the immediate family, i.e. the dad, mum, and siblings.
    • If it's that important to you, you better be sharp. If you want to go for a beauty queen who's had guys buzzing around her from young, you might be setting yourself up for suicide. Use your brains to avoid this or you'll only have yourself to blame.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use