Jump to content

The 13 dreaded gangsters of Punjab


Premi5
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Ranjeet01 said:

These villains are either sociopaths or psychopaths. 

There is a difference between the two from what I have learnt.

Psychopaths are born, sociopaths are made.

We think that a psychopath is a serial killer, but that is not necessarily true. A sociopath can be one as well.

What these two types have is lack of empathy. 

What Punjab's problem is a lack of empathy. That is one of the things us diaspora folk find hard to reconcile. 

If you have heard of the dark triad: Narcissism, Psychopathy and Machiavellianism I think these traits are more common in our place of origin rather than where we now live.

In fact in large parts of Punjab it is seen as good thing to be that way.

Here's an anecdote.

Some years ago I was at someone's house and one of their relatives in Punjab was a corrupt copper (aren't they all) who took loads of backhanders. 

One of the bibian , " Ooh, he's very clever! His dimagh is so tehj! "

One of the bandeh, " No he's a crook!"

I was quite astonished as someone had the guts to call a spade a spade.

Our culture has a habit of circumnavigate moral behaviour where being chilaq is seen as a good thing and is re-worded as being tehj or clever. 

Being forward and honest in your dealings is seen as "bhaula" or being "bhallamans"

Being tricky is lauded whereas being straightforward is seen as being a flaw. 

If our culture was more straightforward in their dealings with each other, Punjab would be a better place.

How was Sikhi expected to stick in a culture populated with these people? No, I don't believe the masses were angels or innocent back then. It was impossible to survive Middle Age India by being a Forrest Gump type character, lol. The impression given to us today is that those people were helpless devotees waiting for that one chance of liberation! Hilarious. Reading the old-school authentic sakhiya of Guru Nanak Dev Ji's travels should be enough to hint at the fact that the average person back then was dodgy at best; dangerous at worst.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

 

There is a difference between the two from what I have learnt.

Psychopaths are born, sociopaths are made.

 

I don't think it's like that. From what I gather psychopaths all have sociopathic traits but are willing to use direct violence. They get a kick out of the helplessness of the victim whilst they are torturing them. So it's like extreme sociopathy. It's like a power buzz from taking life. They make good hit men in criminal fraternities. Others serial killers and even soldiers.

Sociopaths are generally less violent and more cerebral and tactical with their moves. They like to trap people in situations and drain them. They get a kick out of that control. Whilst they may not directly off someone, they still have no conscience and will create scenarios where people feel helpless enough to top themselves, even if these are family. They'll have no regret about this and will just move on to the next victim. They often do really well in business.

They say that people are born with these traits or dispositions but sometimes they only get activated (or made prominent) through abuse (usually in childhood).   But yes, some people seem born like this, even if they have loving supportive upbringings. Being spoilt seems to bring this out in many people too. It looks like a malfunction of the area of the brain that deals with empathy and emotion. It may be that this brain structure is biologically inherited, or that being raised by abusive parents makes the brain form in this way as a coping mechanism.

Because these people can see others stripped of any emotional interpretation, they are able to make detailed detached observations of human behaviour and rely on this information to manipulate others vulnerabilities.  They seem drawn to people with empathetic personalities or people who are vulnerable, like predators are to prey. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, dallysingh101 said:

I don't think it's like that. From what I gather psychopaths all have sociopathic traits but are willing to use direct violence. They get a kick out of the helplessness of the victim whilst they are torturing them. So it's like extreme sociopathy. It's like a power buzz from taking life. They make good hit men in criminal fraternities. Others serial killers and even soldiers.

Sociopaths are generally less violent and more cerebral and tactical with their moves. They like to trap people in situations and drain them. They get a kick out of that control. Whilst they may not directly off someone, they still have no conscience and will create scenarios where people feel helpless enough to top themselves, even if these are family. They'll have no regret about this and will just move on to the next victim. They often do really well in business.

They say that people are born with these traits or dispositions but sometimes they only get activated (or made prominent) through abuse (usually in childhood).   But yes, some people seem born like this, even if they have loving supportive upbringings. Being spoilt seems to bring this out in many people too. It looks like a malfunction of the area of the brain that deals with empathy and emotion. It may be that this brain structure is biologically inherited, or that being raised by abusive parents makes the brain form in this way as a coping mechanism.

Because these people can see others stripped of any emotional interpretation, they are able to make detailed detached observations of human behaviour and rely on this information to manipulate others vulnerabilities.  They seem drawn to people with empathetic personalities or people whop are vulnerable, like predators are to prey. 

 

You think most powerful people, e.g. politicians are sociopaths?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

https://www.psycom.net/antisocial-personality-disorder-sociopath-test/

Sociopath Test: Do I Have Antisocial Personality Disorder?

Do you have a persistent disregard for the feelings of others? Do you lack empathy? Take this assessment to learn more about this mental health condition.

Do you repeatedly lie to or trick others for your own gain or pleasure?
Always
Often
Sometimes
Rarely
Never
Do you act impulsively?
Always
Often
Sometimes
Rarely
Never
Do you fail to plan ahead?
Always
Often
Sometimes
Rarely
Never
Do you consistently fail to fulfill work obligations?
Always
Often
Sometimes
Rarely
Never
Do you consistently fail to fulfill financial obligations?
Always
Often
Sometimes
Rarely
Never
Have you ever engaged in criminal behavior?
Always
Often
Sometimes
Rarely
Never
Do you find yourself unable to empathize with others dealing with difficult situations?
Always
Often
Sometimes
Rarely
Never
If you hurt someone else’s feelings, do you lack remorse or guilt?
Always
Often
Sometimes
Rarely
Never
Are you aggressive?
Always
Often
Sometimes
Rarely
Never
Do you engage in unnecessary risk-taking or dangerous behavior with no regard for the safety of self or others?
Always
Often
Sometimes
Rarely
Never
Do you consider yourself superior to others?
Always
Often
Sometimes
Rarely
Never
Do you use charm or wit to manipulate others for your own benefit?
Always
Often
Sometimes
Rarely
Ne
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Premi5 said:

When you meet people, can you always tell ?

One of the tell tale signs is when someone laughs and smiles.

When you smile and laugh, you do it with your eyes.

These types you see them smiling with their mouths but their eyes don't match up. Also, some of these people don't even blink. It's almost as if they are trying to mimic human behaviour. 

Some of these guys are better at it then others

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Premi5 said:

When you meet people, can you always tell ?

A few more examples, look at Badal junior. Sukhbir Badal.

If you met him, he would seem extremely charming and put you at ease (these types always are) but look at his eyes.

Look at former Italian Prime Minister, Silvio Berlusconi (another sociopath), he has the same kind of expression as Badal Junior.

You see patterns

Maybe I am looking into more than I should, but your human instincts tell you something

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Been so much nindya and attacking Shastarvidiya since the 2000s, however if we look at gatka now it's still mostly as poor and poorly taught as it was back then, still morris dancing moves and still behzti moves in BBC shows about sikhi and vaisakhi. If people were going to attack shastarvidiya, wouldn't have made sense to improve gatka instead and make it more effective? Additionally, the Nihang Singh presence has improved greatly now, and the cracks within the the SGPC and affiliated jatha jathebandis are showing more greatly as panth becomes more knowledgable with dasam bani and itihas day-by-day, so much gyaan which was lost within panjabi sikhs during colonial times. In the 2000s, the groups were able to talk down this bani and  gyaan by associating it with  RSS and hindus, brahminwaad etc. Not working so well now is it? However with gyaan it would be also good for us to try and preserve our martial arts and keertan vidiya as well! More and more crazy keertan videos are coming out from jatha members that are being made fun of and making sangat annoyed and upset, on tiktok and instagram reels.  
    • Author Posted April 24   On 4/21/2025 at 2:43 PM, ipledgeblue said: sirr should not be nanga because keski is usually worn.   Sikhs can sleep nanga-sirr if they choose to . Being from Punjab, almost every Sardaarji i know (amritdhari or not) sleeps/showers with their hair uncovered. I don't think Guru Sahib asked us to wear Dastar to sleep and I don't think it is in SRM.   The idea of "keski being worn to sleep" is cos in Bollywood films (Bachna Ae Haseeno) Sikh characters usually tie a gol parna when sleeping since the actor's usually Hindu. So they gotta cover his head somehow or he'd have cut hair. Same reason Diljit wore a pagg to bed in the El Sueno vid. Only time they didn't do that was in Gadar with Sunny Deol which just looked odd tbh   What in the world? What sikh or even a decent human would base their knowledge of their culture or religion on a movie industry, that too Bollywood?  Believe me, no sikh ever said, I must cover my head becasue an actor did so in a movie. I've been doing it all wrong, I must start covering mh head because the sikh in that movie did.  Just because every panjabi and sardaar you know, does something, also doesn't make it right..  Follow the guru. And if you have a medical condition, then exemptions can be made.  Just admit it, because of my medical condition, I am not able to follow this rehit. Why are you getting everyone else to drop to your level?
    • Wasn't Guru Arjan Dev's martyrdom on amd always commemorated on 6th June? How come it was 30th May?  Just like 6th June 84, where the likes of Terrorists like Indira Gandhi chose to attack Darbar Sahib where many many innocent Sikhs would suffer, as they went to commemorate Martyrdom of Maharaj. 
    • best thing is to follow the Sikh Rehat Maryada and use common sense for gray areas. Anything outside of that's irrelevant tbh that code is what Guru Gobind Singh Ji and the 5 Pyaare agreed on when creating Amrit in 1699
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use