Jump to content

Jap Ji Sahib Katha


Premi5
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Premi5 said:

Majority of the recognised Sants and best Kathakaars (e.g. Damdami Taksal) definitely come from pind background. 'Pendus' are not all bad, and I think on the whole have done a lot more than urban Sikhs in that regard

Without doubt. However, one would expect the message of Sikhi to have a transformative effect on these "messengers" whereby the power of the message itself elevates their being to one that transcends their pendu-ness; an example to inspire the masses to leave behind the manners and demeanour that lead to the necessity for the emergence of the faith in the first place, i.e. serious failings in our cultural character.

You might argue, "Well, he's tailoring the message to his audience," but I don't think he is. I don't think he's that intelligent or astute that he can "switch" modes like that. To me, as someone who has spent a lifetime around people who present varying projections of themselves depending on their agenda and circumstances (in a pejorative, cynical manner), everytime I've heard this gentleman conduct his sermons, his voice and manner drip condescencion, disdain for the sangat, and dare I say more than a hint of deviousness.

I've felt this way about him many, many years before the allegations about him surfaced, and I can only say that I was quite annoyed at myself for not having -- at the time -- the convinction in my own gut instincts to have gone with what I was feeling about him. Rather, I admonished myself for being so judgemental (which seems to be a uniquely Sikh thing to do for those in a period of spirituality where it's easier to shy away from making the right decision; instead choosing to hide behind "Hum nahi chungeh, burra nahi koi" as an easy way out) when I should've been brave enough to listen to what my inner voice was telling me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Premi5 said:

Majority of the recognised Sants and best Kathakaars (e.g. Damdami Taksal) definitely come from pind background. 'Pendus' are not all bad, and I think on the whole have done a lot more than urban Sikhs in that regard

I've talked to some of the high ranking ones. They usually stay at someone I know's house, when in E. London. Some of them seem very intelligent. 

I think they are like professors trying to teach special needs kids, if you get the analogy. I think they go for the lowest common denominator, maybe out of necessity? They are like the literati of the pend scene. 

As, we've (now) discussed ad nauseam here, apnay routinely have personality worship going on. I think they do this with the parchaarak more than pay close attention to what is being said. They also attend Gurdwaras for social purposes, or affiliate with various jathas/personalities to increase their social standing.

I think urban Sikhs are more likely to read. By this term, I also mean rural Sikhs who've put themselves in that literati culture and moved to urban environments and have adopted that culture. . In this respect we have had some quality work being put on by people like Piara Singh Padam, Shamsher Singh Ashok, Bhai Randhir Singh  (not the AKJ one) etc.  We've actually got some quality stuff out there. It's not all perfect but it's there. People shouldn't discount that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dallysingh101 said:

I've talked to some of the high ranking ones. They usually stay at someone I know's house, when in E. London. Some of them seem very intelligent. 

I think they are like professors trying to teach special needs kids, if you get the analogy. I think they go for the lowest common denominator, maybe out of necessity? They are like the literati of the pend scene. 

As, we've (now) discussed ad nauseam here, apnay routinely have personality worship going on. I think they do this with the parchaarak more than pay close attention to what is being said. They also attend Gurdwaras for social purposes, or affiliate with various jathas/personalities to increase their social standing.

I think urban Sikhs are more likely to read. By this term, I also mean rural Sikhs who've put themselves in that literati culture and moved to urban environments and have adopted that culture. . In this respect we have had some quality work being put on by people like Piara Singh Padam, Shamsher Singh Ashok, Bhai Randhir Singh  (not the AKJ one) etc.  We've actually got some quality stuff out there. It's not all perfect but it's there. People shouldn't discount that. 

Now that Sikhs are better educated, the level of detail in Katha should be going up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use