A “Kaur” complaining that “brown” women are not sexualized

[californiasardar1]

3 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

Jatt or not, you made the crux of your argument caste-related. You easily could've framed the discussion on the lines of promiscuity or even modern female hypergamy, but you made it about caste. That's on you. Don't try to wriggle out of it now.

I’m obviously offended by her using “Kaur” in her name (as is obvious by the thread title), and that is what this thread is about.

I don’t need to “wriggle” out of anything. If I wanted to make this about caste, I would have no problems in doing so (see the other thread).

Why on earth would I back down from an argument that I am trying to make on an online forum?

The fact of the matter is, this thread isn’t about denigrating jatts (I have another thread for that). It’s about how shameless it is for this person to write “Kaur” in her name.

Not surprisingly, you get angry before thinking.

[Jacfsing2]

9 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

Doesn't erase the day-to-day reality of what actually happens. When you repeatedly say stuff like the above, it seems like you're afraid of encroaching reality, effectively putting your fingers in your ears, and drowning out the surrounding noise.

Not many people outside of places like this forum adhere to the archaic modes of conduct you're describing above. Hell, I'd hazard a guess even most of the people on here behave a lot differently away from this forum to what they actually claim to be doing. But that's just the way of things.

Our people are too soft of CharitroPakyan, claiming Guru Sahib didn’t warn us, yet still got no problem with doing everything it warns us against. 

[dallysingh101]

3 hours ago, Premi5 said:

Yep these ones weren’t 

the subject of this thread is Canadian, that sort of stuff (grooming or ‘sexualisation’) seems to be much less prevalent overall 

 

 

 

Nice. And to show you all how it's done:

*deleted*

Look guys! I didn't explode into a thousand pieces!! My identity and self-esteem are still strong!! Yeahh!! lol

[Jassu]

Women wouldn’t be like this if there weren’t these mass armies of beta simps online who worship them. It’s not religious Kaur who has 100,000+ followers it’s nangi Kaur who does. If a woman got more attention and admiration for being religious then she would follow that path. Just look at Instagram it’s full of Punjabi (mostly Sikh) instathots and 90% of the followers are men. Honestly men are even more pathetic than women at times. Men will do anything for a beautiful woman, lol.

[Jacfsing2]

10 minutes ago, Jassu said:

Women wouldn’t be like this if there weren’t these mass armies of beta simps online who worship them. It’s not religious Kaur who has 100,000+ followers it’s nangi Kaur who does. If a woman got more attention and admiration for being religious then she would follow that path. Just look at Instagram it’s full of Punjabi (mostly Sikh) instathots and 90% of the followers are men. Honestly men are even more pathetic than women at times. Men will do anything for a beautiful woman, lol.

Yeah, being more religious after a certain point is a turnoff. The nangi Kaur knows what to do to be popular with men who’ll throw money at her. 

[dallysingh101]

34 minutes ago, Jassu said:

Women wouldn’t be like this if there weren’t these mass armies of beta simps online who worship them. It’s not religious Kaur who has 100,000+ followers it’s nangi Kaur who does. If a woman got more attention and admiration for being religious then she would follow that path. Just look at Instagram it’s full of Punjabi (mostly Sikh) instathots and 90% of the followers are men. Honestly men are even more pathetic than women at times. Men will do anything for a beautiful woman, lol.

Some blokes know how to make money off these attention seeking types too. lol 

Not all blokes are simps like you are suggesting. And even the rise of this type can be directly traced to modern western culture, especially the fashion industry, where gay men in power have been promoting these effeminate, 'metrosexual' types - which were really just a gay man's wet dream.

We've been warned by our dharam about women who exploit simps in Charitrio Pakyaan (plus some of us are intelligent enough to see it going on and recognise it for what it is), so those of us who are clued up, know the score. 

[Premi5]

1 hour ago, Ranjeet01 said:

Brown girls do like to be sexualized, it just depends who the audience is

 

1 hour ago, dallysingh101 said:

Media teaches us a lot of things - I don't swallow all of it. 

Good ! 

[dallysingh101]

The media connection to the emergence of simps:

[dallysingh101]

5 hours ago, californiasardar1 said:

Why does this “actress” use “Kaur” in her name? She should at least have the decency of using her caste surname if she is going to behave like this.

I'd go even further. I'd say they should use a name like Sharon or Tracey Smith if they are that adamant that they want to act a sl@g.   

[Jacfsing2]

2 hours ago, dallysingh101 said:

It's just we (brown b@stards) don't make cringe TV series about these things (and probably a good job too, because the movies would be shyte with some fudhu bhangra singer as the lead, and songs with faggy dance routines being thrown in every 20 minutes......)

We need Daler Mehndi or someone important on this pronto.