Jump to content

So it begins...true face of AAP in Panjab


Kau89r8
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, proactive said:

I agree that Bhagat Singh is propped up the Indian media but you second point I cannot disagree with more, I have never met a mona who justified him being a mona on Bhagat Singh! 

 

I

Are you serious?

Virtually every mona I have encountered (in real life or online) who attempts to justify being mona will say something like "so-and-so was mona and was a shaheed and KP Gill kept his kesh, so kesh is meaningless" They sometimes cite Bhagat Singh, sometimes other "shaheeds."

Anyway, it's really not difficult to understand why monay prop him up: people want heroes who are like them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, californiasardar1 said:

Are you serious?

Virtually every mona I have encountered (in real life or online) who attempts to justify being mona will say something like "so-and-so was mona and was a shaheed and KP Gill kept his kesh, so kesh is meaningless" They sometimes cite Bhagat Singh, sometimes other "shaheeds."

Anyway, it's really not difficult to understand why monay prop him up: people want heroes who are like them.

I have heard the excuse of KP Gill but never Bhagat singh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/22/2022 at 4:40 PM, Suchi said:

Seems that farm laws were supported by the majority of farmers, and the Supreme Court was well aware but did nothing.

Really? Your infographic shows "61 organizations representing 3.3 cr farmers" were for the reforms.

What is that supposed to even mean? 

The fact that the govt got some of their henchmen who happen to be heads of certain organizations to put out press releases does not mean that 3.3 crore farmers were vehemently for these "reforms".

You really think all those farmers evaluated the laws in minute detail?

Meanwhile, at the main stage for the farmers protest you had lawyers and others day in and day out talking about the laws in detail. And the ways that they would end up being traps for farmers (written on purpose in the laws).

The opposition of an informed group means much more than the "membership" in an organization which has been co-opted by the govt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/23/2022 at 8:53 AM, Suchi said:

AAP is CIA controlled apoarently:

 

That's actually quite possible. The CIA always tries to maintain links with both ruling and up-and-coming parties. It is always looking to influence countries one way or another. It doesn't care about "stopping corruption in Punjab" or "100 free units of electricity". It just wants whoever's in power to be beholden to it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/23/2022 at 3:27 PM, californiasardar1 said:

 

The people of Punjab have consistently voted in bums.

I hate to say it, but by voting for such people, they get what they deserve.

Bro, I'd like to ask you to have a bit more compassion for us. (Yeah, "us" regardless of whether you're in Punjab, Canada, or Malaysia. It's all "us").

The reason is: what kind of fair election can you have when you don't have the right to full free expression? If you say what you'd really like to do when elected, they won't let you enter your election papers. 

Or you can't say what you want in the media.

So it's rigged in that sense from the beginning. What outcome do you think there'd be?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, proactive said:

Kultar Singh Sadhwan the Punjab speaker who incidentally is the grandson of Giani Zail Singh apologised so quickly to the Akal Takht Jathedar after a video of him undergoing a ceremony where a Bahman waved a cow's tail on his turban shows that he understands that excuses that were used before that politicians need to keep all sections of society happy won't wash anymore.

What? They made Zail Singh's grandson the Punjab speaker? That's a deliberate insult. I mean, you can't find one other person be speaker than him?

Also, is the speaker supposed to be a member of the assembly or a nonmember?

Secondly, I have no idea why Sikh politicians think it's necessary to to Bahman stuff to make Hindus happy. I don't actually think Hindus care about that, it's just our politicians are so stupid.

As a Sikh I wouldn't require a Hindu to carry a kirpan or something, I just want him to do the right thing in office.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BhForce said:

Bro, I'd like to ask you to have a bit more compassion for us. (Yeah, "us" regardless of whether you're in Punjab, Canada, or Malaysia. It's all "us").

The reason is: what kind of fair election can you have when you don't have the right to full free expression? If you say what you'd really like to do when elected, they won't let you enter your election papers. 

Or you can't say what you want in the media.

So it's rigged in that sense from the beginning. What outcome do you think there'd be?

Maybe they should be a little humble, which would make it easier to sympathise with their plight? The arrogance of even absolute 5hits in our community over there is staggering. They write cheques they can't cash, and when someone takes it to them hard, they play victim.

And I don't buy that "muh oppressed" narrative. Oppressed folks don't behave like Punjabis do. They've lost Punjab, anyway. It's a done deal. There's no, "It will happen one day." It's done. The mass exodus of them to the West is the visible result of their defeat. They're abandoning their homeland for the material comforts of the West. They're done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So, are you saying Guru ji isn't God? Or are you saying the British encouraged this belief?
    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use