Jump to content

Eggs ?


Guest guest
 Share

Recommended Posts

Here are some reasons

Milk is a food product.  The cow produces it with the intention that it will be consumed for food.  Herbivores like cows, goats, etc. drink milk.  The fact that cows are mistreated now by the milk industry has lead many Gursikhs to go to organic milk, but our own Guru Sahibs drank milk.

Eggs are produced as a form of life.  They are not meant to be food.  The only things that eat the eggs are carnivores who steal them, like wolves, dogs, etc.  No herbivore eats eggs.  Hens do regularly give eggs that aren't fertilized.  So do human women.  You are eating the equivalent of a period (sorry to be so graphic). 

Does that sound yummy?

133495[/snapback]

cow produce milk for its calf not for humans.for centuries hindus befooled people

that cow is a mother and it is producing milk for humans.strange that some sikhs still beleive in it

133500[/snapback]

Under no circumstances( fertilised/unfertilised) is milk intended to grow into a new lifeform, whereas egg can. sikhs have been doing lot of things hindus do, so should we do opposite of whatever hindus say or do?

hindus remove their shoes before entring a temple.. sikhs do same..... now do you want sikhs to do opposite? dont compare apples with oranges and dont be misguided by utter hate for other religions.

Fateh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

>>>>>>

cow produce milk for its calf not for humans.for centuries hindus befooled people

that cow is a mother and it is producing milk for humans.strange that some sikhs still beleive in it

>>>>>>

If that's the case, then it seems you think our Guru Sahibs were fooled as well?

Guru Sahib drank milk. There is no doubt about it.

If you think our Guru Sahibs can be fooled, then I don't think you can even be a Sikh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to tria chariter, Guru Ji got fooled, therfore, those believing in tria chhariter aren't Sikh. Safe! Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! Thank you!

133521[/snapback]

lol- was waiting for your input on this one. Was sure you'd tell us milk is like egg without the shell as science tells us etc ( although I argue something else is more similar to egg without the shell), didn't see the Treh Charriter angle coming lol. Nice touch!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>>>>>>

cow produce milk for its calf not for humans.for centuries hindus befooled people

that cow is a mother and it is producing milk for humans.strange that some sikhs still beleive in it

>>>>>>

If that's the case, then it seems you think our Guru Sahibs were fooled as well? 

Guru Sahib drank milk.  There is no doubt about it. 

If you think our Guru Sahibs can be fooled, then I don't think you can even be a Sikh.

133516[/snapback]

wjkk

wjkf

our guru s drank milk because diet was never an issue in sikhism.

it is only some brahmin type sikhs that have bring this issue in sikhism

i have a suraj prakash in which it is written that guru nanak ate meat at kurukshetra.meat was distribuited in langar at the time of guru angad.but the replies of the vegetarians is that we are no where near the awastha of guruji

we can't eat it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

haha First of all a Human females period produces blood, and also other things that release with the egg. A human womens egg is not enclosed in a shell, and is very very small, a human womens egg cannot be harvested for food for those reasons. Also not every egg will be fertilized by the rooster, hence the unfertilized eggs are shipped to consumers. As for why dont we eat rooster sperm? Is that really considered a counter argument or did a 12 year old just say that? When you get to the sixth grade youll learn what the differences are between eggs, and semen, we dont need to tell you that now. Also I dont think that cows actually produce milk for the intention of human consumption. Did you know our bodies have a very diffucult time digesting milk? Milk actually slows down the digestion process after a certain age. Please lets think before we post!!!

Also to the post saying our Gurus ate meat, I really think thats inaccurate, and diet should be an issue, I think enlightened men would not eat meat....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

post-1826-1132092752_thumb.jpg

>>>>>>

cow produce milk for its calf not for humans.for centuries hindus befooled people

that cow is a mother and it is producing milk for humans.strange that some sikhs still beleive in it

>>>>>>

If that's the case, then it seems you think our Guru Sahibs were fooled as well? 

Guru Sahib drank milk.  There is no doubt about it. 

If you think our Guru Sahibs can be fooled, then I don't think you can even be a Sikh.

133516[/snapback]

wjkk

wjkf

our guru s drank milk because diet was never an issue in sikhism.

it is only some brahmin type sikhs that have bring this issue in sikhism

i have a suraj prakash in which it is written that guru nanak ate meat at kurukshetra.meat was distribuited in langar at the time of guru angad.but the replies of the vegetarians is that we are no where near the awastha of guruji

we can't eat it.

133524[/snapback]

Can you please elaborate on sri guru hargobinds hukumnama telling sikhs "maas machi de nere nahi javna"..... Or would you call it fake?

http://www.info-sikh.com/PageM1.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lostsoul,

whether the cow produces the milk for human consumption is besides the point. It is produced as a food product. Our Gurus drank milk. Milk is a non-issue.

Eggs are never produced to be a food product. Only predatory carnivores eat eggs.

As for the kurukushetra story, maybe you should read it a bit further. When Guru Sahib cooks the meat, what comes out? It's not meat. I believe its either kheer or karah. Can't remember. If you want to use a story, tell the the whole thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also I dont think that cows actually produce milk for the intention of human consumption.  Please lets think before we post!!!

Also to the post saying our Gurus ate meat, I really think thats inaccurate, and diet should be an issue, I think enlightened men would not eat meat....

133533[/snapback]

I also think than hens dont produce eggs for human consumption and cows/poultry dont giver birth to offsprings so that they can be butchered and fed to satisfy someones taste bud. Would you like your offsprings to be fed to other carnivore animals?

Please lets think before we post!!!

Fateh!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also I dont think that cows actually produce milk for the intention of human consumption.  Please lets think before we post!!!

Also to the post saying our Gurus ate meat, I really think thats inaccurate, and diet should be an issue, I think enlightened men would not eat meat....

133533[/snapback]

I also think than hens dont produce eggs for human consumption and cows/poultry dont giver birth to offsprings so that they can be butchered and fed to satisfy someones taste bud. Would you like your offsprings to be fed to other carnivore animals?

Please lets think before we post!!!

Fateh!

133537[/snapback]

Thats the thing, I am thinking!!! before you get worked up and use these!!!!! which by the way doesnt make your statement any more right THINK! Please show me where I said anything about butchering animals? Where did I ever say that? Im talking about EGGS, UNFERTILIZED EGGS. And Brother Singh, what is the purpose of those eggs then? Throw them away? Eggs are edible raw or cooked, so therefore it is produced for consumption. Carnivores drink milk to whats the point? I could use that same reference as well...it still doesnt explain why eggs are a no no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Umm, that's totally irrational, bro. There are plenty of prakash-dara Singhs in Punjab (less than we'd like, but still plenty). No one cares that you are sabat soorat. It isn't 1986. You can walk around in chola, kurta-pajama, or jeans. Whatever. If you want the look @dallysingh101 is referring to, just go into a cheap clothing shop (not a Western-style mall) and buy some shirts for 250 rupees or a track suit for 2000 rupees. You'll get the cheap stuff made in some sweatshop in Bombay.
    • The Mind is Jyot Saroop (Waheguru), but the mind is under the influence of five evils… Through Naam Simran( Rememberance), the mind will begin to detach from evil, and get back to its original form ( MANN TU JYOT SAROOP HEH)… Until the mind breaks free from the five evils, one will go through the cycle of paap and punn….which leads to Karma… Naam Simran destroys past karma, and prevents new karma coming into fruition… I did this, I did that… This non realisation of the Jyot Saroop gives rise to paap and Punn, which in turn gives birth to suffering and misery…
    • I agree we're not born with sin like the Christians think. Also I agree we have effects of karma. But Gurbani does state that the body contains both sin and charity (goodness): ਕਾਇਆ ਅੰਦਰਿ ਪਾਪੁ ਪੁੰਨੁ ਦੁਇ ਭਾਈ ॥ Within the body are the two brothers sin and virtue. p126 Actually, we do need to be saved. Gurbani calls this "udhaar" (uplift). Without Satguru, souls are liable to spiritual death: ਜਿਨਾ ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਪੁਰਖੁ ਨ ਭੇਟਿਓ ਸੇ ਭਾਗਹੀਣ ਵਸਿ ਕਾਲ ॥ p40 Those who have not met Satguru Purakh are unfortunate and liable to death. So, yeah, we do need to be saved, and Guru ji does the saving. The reason Satguru is the one to save is because God has given Satguru the "key" (kunji): ਸਤਿਗੁਰ ਹਥਿ ਕੁੰਜੀ ਹੋਰਤੁ ਦਰੁ ਖੁਲੈ ਨਾਹੀ ਗੁਰੁ ਪੂਰੈ ਭਾਗਿ ਮਿਲਾਵਣਿਆ ॥੭॥ In the True Guru's hand is the key. None else can open the door. By perfect good fortune the Guru is met. p124
    • That's unfortunate to hear. Could you give any more information? Who was this "baba"? He just disappeared with people's money? Obviously, you should donate your money to known institutions or poor people that you can verify the need of through friends and family in Punjab.
    • Sangat ji,  I know a family who went Sevewal to do seva sometimes end of 2019. They returned last year in great dismay and heart broken.  To repent for their mistakes they approached panj pyaare. The Panj gave them their punishment / order to how t make it up which, with Kirpa, they fulfilled.  They were listening to a fake Baba who, in the end, took all the "Donations " and fled sometime over a year ago. For nearly 4 years this family (who are great Gursikhs once u get to know them) wasted time and effort for this fake Baba. NOT ONLY this one fam. But many, many did worldwide and they took their fam to do seva, in village Sevewal, city Jaitho in Punjab. In the end many families lost money in thousands being behind this Baba. The family, on return, had to get in touch with all the participants and told them to stop.  I am stating this here to create awareness and we need to learn from whom we follow and believe. It's no easy but if we follow the 3 S (Sangat, Simran and Seva) we will be shown the light. As I am writing this the family in question have been doing the same since 2008 onwards and they fell for this Baba... it is unbelievable and shocking.  This am writing in a nutshell as am at work on my break so not lengthy but it deserves a great length.  Especially the family in question, who shed light on youngsters about Sikhi 20 plus years!! 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use