Jump to content

The Sikh awareness effect


>Bikramjit Singh<
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

that is what he wrote on the website..basically they're taunting the people who have called him enemy of the khalsa..with enemy of the salsa..and using music/musicians as symbols..sigh..

they said for his punishment in bad taste of music..send him to an akj raensabhai :@

what is happening to the world :@

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

Bhainji

I've got no problems with them trying to spoof our threads and trying to make remarks such as 'enemy of salsa', it just shows how deeply disturbed these people are. What I take issue with the way he makes up words such as 'Bjorkbani' to imitate Gurbani. Then he copies the way Gurbani is written by using 'Kahi Bjork' similar to the way Gurbani uses 'Kahi Nanak'.

And this from the guy who wrote that AKJ were modern Ram Raiayas for not accepting the Ragmala.

This is how Gurbani teaches us what happens to such paapis

Paapi Karam kamavde kardeh hai haie

Nanak Jeo Mathan Maadhaaniya

Teo Mathay Dharam Rai

SGGS page 1425

The sinners sin and in the end they shout 'hai hai'

Just as the churning stick churns butter so does Dharam Rai churn them.

GurFateh

Bikramjit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol neo shut the f* up mate!

B)

you guys are ridiculous, you throw your rules and regulations about, and yet you abuse them freely yourselves!!! you claim freedom of speech, yet when someone speaks their mind, u ban them then cont to discuss them behind their back!

from my understanding, PM ie private messages are meant to be private... so what is truthsingh doing posting up peoples private mesaages on the forum?!?!

its nice acting nice and high and mighty and claim that you are just spectators, but thats a load of rubbish!!

out of the 3 people you have banned from your website.. how many where 'anti-nang' and how many supported the nang/nihang mentality?! is it just a coincidence that all 3 argued against the issues raised by them fools? all three got banned, and yet the other parties involved in the arguements still stay as they were!!! lol

if someone speaks against them, its slander, if they cus anyone, its intelligent discussion!

shut up, pull you head out of your bum and smell the bhang which their cooking right under your nose!

you talk about hate mongering?!?!

let me ask you, b4 those websites were released how much hate was their amongst 'nihang' youth and the rest of uk youth?? have the webs increased it or decreased it?

are you happy being called brianwashed? are you happy with shaheeds being cussed? if that isnt hate mongering then what is?!

snap out of it.

by the way, iv emailed you and the other mods

there once b4, with no suprise you failed to reply, or even recognise acceptance of the email, which was genuinly sent to help you guys.

so ill write you another one soon, this time talking direct,maybe you'll reply this time round.

dnt forget to keep a tissue with you, dnt want your nose getting dirty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TODAY IM STUNNED BY READING THAT STUPID POST OF HIS AND NO ACTIONS TAKEN AGAINST HIM.. (I don't care if they give warning to him now or later on..) but making fun of gurbani quote is way tooo far.. :@

Though his post got deleted, but i would like to know from the sewadars DID THEY BAN HIM YET ?? (just a humble question)

I saved the whole thread just to give some proof to the mods/admins of sikhawareness that he did made the fun of gurbani... (in case they didn't get a chance to read it) Pm me.. :@

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use