Jump to content

A Sikh Mans Love For Saddam


singh1986
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

i personally dont think that u can compare what happened to saddam to what happened with indira. YES they both committed very inhumane acts but the difference here is the majority of world leaders were against saddam the majority of the world was against him for what he was doing .. but indira no one knew what was going on because everything released to the press was censored to make her look "good" , my point being sikhs wouldn't have the slightest chance to 'capture her, lock her up and put her to trial'

and also assasination isnt the same as a death sentence... sure the outcome is the same but death sentence is a judge (someone from the outside looking in - even though this guy was iraqi was he a victim? did he feel the pain others felt?i understand a judge needs to be impartial but then how can they truely know if a death sentence is right??) in a court of law deciding whether or not u qualify to stay alive :D

i agree with pakandi and sitar girl totalllllyyyyy its all politics (cept for the palastine stuff cuz i didnt read that bit tongue.gif lol) they are all as bad as each other cept some leaders do it in a sly way ie BUSHY WUSHY who tries to fool people into thinkin hes doing it for the greater good of mankind...

i totally agree with what sitar girl said "why now" - like when he said all that backwass that started it off "im giving u 48 hours to hand over power or leave iraq" - WHO IS HE TO SAY THAT?? United Nations should have been the ones to say it

heckling at him while he had the noose around his neck- that was nasty dont get me wrong - i understand why they did it

what harm was he gonna do to the world by being locked up for life?atleast then he'd have time to think about his actions!!!!

i'll say it again i think sentencing someone to death is wrong if that makes me a Kat and a sell out so be it - no matter how wrong someone is u should always try and show some kind of compassion, is that not what Guru ji would want?

ps. the bit abt all terrorists being muslim- their not muslim - they THINK they're muslim but realy theyr dillusional

& also lol i dont think sitar girl meant she doesnt see the point of jews in that way! i think she meant she doesnt see the point of their argument??

wjkk wjkf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

saddam did what a ruler should do .... ankhila is one who take revenge of his elders from the guilty .... more over this world today and in future will only label muslims or sikhs as terrorists not christens and hindus becuase they dont fight for there relegion .... they themself make fun of there prophets can be seen on tv whats left ....

saddam RIP .... may guru bless ur soul

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously Sharam Karo! He was a Murderer he killed people in Mustard Gas bomb in COLD BLOOD with NO justification...I know many Kurdish refugees in this country and the things Saddam did to these peoples families is Horrendous!

If he was to do this to Sikhs you people supporting him would be jumping up and down like Bandars, But Oh just because he tortuered muslims it doesnt realy matter he's a good man just because he created a Gurdwara or whatever. Have a Consenious Man he tourted old women; he gave permission to his sons to go raping random women,

How the hell was he any different from Indira? she murdered PEOPLE in cold blood and so did Saddam stop thinking about relgion for a second!

He was a Tyrant and a Dictator...simple!

Forgive my mistakes!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Narinder Singh

The fact that the US invasion of Iraq has killed more than triple the amount of people Saddam has killed cannot be overlooked. However, Saddam was found guilty and brought to justice, and the ugliness of this war shouldnt be used to cover up the actions of this dictator.

Its really hard to comprehend how Sikhs who call Indra a witch, <admin-profanity filter activated>, kuthi and so on for murdering so many Sikhs are actually sympathetic towards Saddam, those lives he destroyed are just as valuable as any Sikh life. Bush isnt any different though, he hides behind the banner of "democracy" just as India has done for so many years, that monkey will get whats coming to him in this life or after.

There is a deep routed hatred in some Sikhs towards Muslims and Hindus that people are actually trying to justify, its disgusting, a true Sikh has no room for hatred in his heart, where there's love, hate cannot reside, its either or.

To some things up, im tired of supporting "one" cause and being have to chose sides, every nation in the world is corrupt and every "ruler" has the blood of innocent people on their hands.

Fateh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a deep routed hatred in some Sikhs towards Muslims and Hindus that people are actually trying to justify, its disgusting, a true Sikh has no room for hatred in his heart, where there's love, hate cannot reside, its either or.

Thank you for saying that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use