Jump to content

Suddam captured in raid


S1ngh
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

excellent points Mr §ingh, one of the first things the US army protected with troops were the oil wells.

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

They were protecting the oil wells because that's where the future prosperity of the country was going to come from.

Mr Singh

Does Kosovo have oil ?. How about Bosnia ?. East Timor ?.

GurFateh

Bikramjit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

where are the weapons, why won't the free people in other countries.

"They were protecting the oil wells because that's where the future prosperity of the country was going to come from." hahaha

They were protecting the oil wells because thats what was going to help the suffering american economy.

tell me this >Bikramjit Singh<, will they make billions of dallars from this war. for sure, whos companies are going to rebulid iraq?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But tell me, what u THINK

Would they, or would they not....Whats ur thoughts :T:

out of interest this question is because of my ignorance

What did USA do to Khomani :T: (I'm not sure, thats why I'm asking..And please forigve my poor spelling :T: )

Also btw....Have USA not "stolen" Oil from Iraq AT ALL :T:

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bikram veerji...

the US did not LIBERATE iraq....liberation usually means self goverence...they are an occupied nation...

secondly...all the big rebuilding contracts went to companies that have direct ties with Bush and Cheney...in fact...Cheney used to be the CEO of Haliburton, the company rebuilding the oil well and pipelines...and since the time he has become Vice President ...he has been paid over 350 000 from the company and still gets holds on to his stock options in the company...hmm...that should make people suspicious enough...

Also...the US goverenment who loves to throw around the word free market...gave contracts to these companies without even opening up the bidding to other companies...totally cancelled the chance for fair competition...

And Bremer (the guy in charge of iraq) has fired over 400 000 civil servants in the country...he called it the debaathification...but many of these people were really low level workers.....

but probably the worst thing they have done is Bremer announcing that foreign investors will be totally tax exempt AND they can take 100 percent of the profits out of the country...this is every multinational corporation's christmas wish list....the neo-liberal americans have turned iraq into one huge economic experiment where ultimately the iraqis are gonna lose big time....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

where are the weapons, why won't the free people in other countries.

"They were protecting the oil wells because that's where the future prosperity of the country was going to come from." hahaha

They were protecting the oil wells because thats what was going to help the suffering american economy.

tell me this >Bikramjit Singh<, will they make billions of dallars from this war. for sure, whos companies are going to rebulid iraq?

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

Do you know how much money the US and UK spent on tha war?. Billions, do you begrudge them trying to recoup some of that money back. The reason why the US doesn't want to give contracts to French, German and Russian companies is because they countries tried to sabotage the unity of the UN. As for the French, they were the ones who sold him the nuclear power station that Israel bombed in the 1980's.

Gill Bhaji, look beyond you hatred of Bush, as I wrote before it is western powers that will in the end get us Khalistan. If the Sikhs in Punjab vote a Khalistani party into power, the GOI can do nothing to stop that party declaring independence. In such a scenario the western powers will stop the Indian govt trying to use military power to crush a democratic movement. We've all seen this is Croatia and Slovennia

when the Yugoslav govt tried to take charge after these states declared independence.

GurFateh

Bikramjit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>Bikramjit Singh<, "Do you know how much money the US and UK spent on tha war?.", of course they spent money on the war, but the thing is that they'll make tons of profit from the war, and it will get they're economy going, which is a long term thing.

i disagree with you on this point, "it is western powers that will in the end get us Khalistan", once the goi labells sikhs as terrorists, do you really think the US will help us. the US will agree with the goi, becasue they don't want to start tension with them and they need india for trade, wars, and just overall support. goi will be in the best interest of the US.

i believe it will be sikhs(fighters and politions) that will get us khalstian, and ordinary hindu's that will see what they're gov't is doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use