Jump to content

Mahatma Gandhi


84_Survivor
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

listen ppl ..1stly who the <admin-profanity filter activated> said i worship him...i respect him.i only worship god. if ppl think the only way 2 resolve problems is by going all guns blazing then thats screwed up.the combinatin of BOTH the resistance and the actions of Sardar Bhagat singh and Sardar Udham SIngh and all other "un sung" actions gave india its independence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

gandhi freed india but when pakistan attacked india right after independence then what happened to fasting? next time pakistan attacks india, let's all sit on the border and tell pakistan we are going to fast until they leave. please. real and true methods of resistance don't change over time. the methods of the great mahatma barely lasted, whereas the spirit of the "misguided patriot's" khalsa protects the nation to this day.

i'll give you depth, but what is depth to an enslaved mind?

saanu lalkaarna howe ta soch samaj ki lalkaar, assi koyee aire gare ni, saadi wi hik wich punjab di dharti da khoon wagda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

gandhi freed india but when pakistan attacked india right after independence then what happened to fasting? next time pakistan attacks india, let's all sit on the border and tell pakistan we are going to fast until they leave. please. real and true methods of resistance don't change over time. the methods of the great mahatma barely lasted, whereas the spirit of the "misguided patriot's" khalsa protects the nation to this day.

i'll give you depth, but what is depth to an enslaved mind?

saanu lalkaarna howe ta soch samaj ki lalkaar, assi koyee aire gare ni, saadi wi hik wich punjab di dharti da khoon wagda.

Gandhi philosphy doesn't work everywhere or in every situation but he gave a good food for thought.

His life was very open to public view.

I personally do not acknowledge Gandhi methods but still he had the courage to do something which people never tried to its extreme.

Finding faults in every person of this world is very easy job. We can rip apart anybdy. But still I admire Gandhi as a unique creation of the almighty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waheguru ji ka khalsa

waheguru ji ki fateh

As theres been a lot of emphasis on word "slandering", I just googled for word "slander". (Slander = Nindiya)

Heres what I got:-

slan·der Pronunciation (slndr)

n.

1. Law Oral communication of false statements injurious to a person's reputation.

2. A false and malicious statement or report about someone.

Saying that a snake killed a boy when it bit him and a snake is dangerous animal and has venom, doesnt mean we are slandering that Snake, but its called stating FACTS and TRUTH.

Nindya is baseless and factless.

If one says Gandhi didnt try to save Bhagat Singh & his friends, its no SLANDERING but stating truth which is even realised by non-sikhs also.

Fateh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Dancing Warrior

The myth of Ghandi may never be separated from the Fact of Ghandi. We may never know the true Ghandi. Almost every synopsis of him is tainted leaning towards the bias of the author. In Panjab he had very little influence. Panjabi’s associate the freedom struggle more with Kartar Singh, Chander Bose, Rajguru, Bhagat Singh, Sukhdev and later Udham Singh just to name a few.

historian Dr. Rajiv Lochan suggests:

"From all events and records available it is quite obvious that Gandhiji perceived both Subhas Chander Bose and Bhagat Singh as potential threats to his own highly acclaimed position"[3]

Some of you may be shocked to learn that Bhagat Singh did was an Atheist and followed Marxism; Ghandi on the other hand was religious zealist. Whilst Ghandi opted for the British to be the over all rulers and Indians govern themselves, Bhagat Singh and Chander Bose wanted the Brits totally out of India. The latter was gaining more popularity amongst the populous as the British brutality tried to hold on to India. Bhagat Singhs philosophy was based on an equality system one of his reasons for being an atheist was due to the fact he viewed India’s inability to shake of hits invading masters was due to its social break up and caste class system heavily pregnated with religious ideology. Ghandi on the other hand was deep in his belief in his faith and used it for his version of a partial freedom struggle. He would often fast to manipulate the will of the people. Bhagat Singh and Ghandi were at two different ends of the spectrum fighting for a similar cause.

No Indian would have hung Bhagat Singh but there were plenty who would have shot Ghandi as eventually one did. Ghandi was once quoted as saying

“The rusty sword of the Sikhs has no place in the age of the atom Bomb”

To this I would say

“it is well known that the third world war would eventually be fought with sticks and stones, surely my rusty sword will determine who is last standing”

The saddest thing I came across once was in the library of a local Gurudwara a few years ago where I came across some dusty old pictures of the true martyrs Bhagat Singh and Udham Singh they had been discarded in the corner. When asking why they were not on display the librarian stated “we do not believe in freedom for India we only believe in Khalistan, they wasted their lives for India”. How very sad.

I bought pictures of the Shaheeds including a very nice one of Bhagat Singh wearing his hat and Udham Singh as well as others. Eventually when one day my kids will ask;

“Dad, who is that?” I will take great pride in telling them;

“RAM MOHAMED SINGH AZAD” as Udham Singh did. :TH:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use