Jump to content

Is Chating Naam Wothless For Non Amritdharies?


Guest andhula_neech
 Share

Recommended Posts

amritdhari singhs are given naam to jaap by punj peyare like in earlier times it was given by guru sahib himself .... no one other can give u naam and this no one includes person himself .... if we are giving naam to people our kids and everyone around we are just breaking mareyada of guru and sikh ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

amritdhari singhs are given naam to jaap by punj peyare like in earlier times it was given by guru sahib himself .... no one other can give u naam and this no one includes person himself .... if we are giving naam to people our kids and everyone around we are just breaking mareyada of guru and sikh ....

Thats not my question jassa veer. My question is if only panj pyaare can give naam, what about people from other religions? Don't they jap naam?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

actually there have been several puuran mahatma saadhus who gave naam, and the panth accepts them as puuran mahapurakhs. Japping gurmantr and moolmantr without taking amrit is fine and one who does will recieve gifts, tey wil want to take amrit. . . e.g. bhai rama singh b4 taking amrit did how many sukhmani sahibs and gurmantr jaap aday? im sure he received the fruit of these paats upon being blessed with amrit. and known as a real chardi kallaaa gursikh of the panth. please stop going off topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest andhula_neech

please do not fight over chanting naam is worthless.

i am very sorry for making that the heading of topic and it was not actually my question.

i am again and again asking to discuss about naam simran, read my previous reply please.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest _Singh_
actually there have been several puuran mahatma saadhus who gave naam, and the panth accepts them as puuran mahapurakhs. Japping gurmantr and moolmantr without taking amrit is fine and one who does will recieve gifts, tey wil want to take amrit. . . e.g. bhai rama singh b4 taking amrit did how many sukhmani sahibs and gurmantr jaap aday? im sure he received the fruit of these paats upon being blessed with amrit. and known as a real chardi kallaaa gursikh of the panth. please stop going off topic.

Khalistan Zindabad, only guru sahib can give naam through punj pyare, no indivdual can give it. A true mahapursh would say only guru sahib is the true giver of the invaluable naam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

waheguru ji ka khalsa waheguru ji ki fateh

If a person never takes amrit then they have wasted a lifetime. the supreme fruits of naam japna can only be experienced after taking amrit. however that is not to say that non amritdharis should not jap naam. like khalistan zindabad said the more a person japs naam/gurbani before taking amrit, the more rehit the abhlaaki keeps in preperation then this will be useful. if we emerse ourselves in naam and gurbani before amrit sanchar then surely we wil be blessed by mahraj.

however amrit is like opening a bank account. the naam you jap is your money that you save. if you have not opened the bank account then how can you save the money?

taking amrit is essential, and we all hope to have wahegurus jis darshan and to merge back in to waheguru. if we reject the most important thing that satguru sri guru granth sahib ji has given us... amrit then how can we hope to achieve these goals?

so japping naam for a non-ad is not worthless as it will eventually bring them closer to amrit. however if we have not taken amrit and recieved naam then how can we jap it effectively and receive the highest fruits of our labour?

mukhahu har har sabh ko karai viralai hiradhai vasaaeiaa ||

Everyone can chant the Name of the Lord, Har, Har with their mouths, but only a few enshrine it within their hearts.

naanak jin kai hiradhai vasiaa mokh mukath thinh paaeiaa ||8||2||

O Nanak, those who enshrine the Lord within their hearts, attain liberation and emancipation.

japping naam aint just about saying it, anybody can 'jap naam' like the above gurbani states, many other people from other faiths do this and have been doing this for ages, without satguru we cannot receive or enshrine the true naam gurmantr.

satguru is jyot of 10 guru sahibans sri guru granth sahib ji. if everything was ok and all other dharams could jap naam effectively n reach waheguru then what was the need for guru nanak dev ji to come to this earth? the fact is in this age of kalyug only satguru nanak can save us no1 else.

sabh thae vaddaa sathigur naanak jin kal raakhee maeree ||4||10||57||

Guru Nanak is the greatest of all; He saved my honor in this Dark Age of Kali Yuga. ||4||10||57||

bin sathigur saevae bahuthaa dhukh laagaa jug chaarae bharamaaee ||

Without serving the True Guru, he suffers in terrible pain, and throughout the four ages, he wanders aimlessly.

ham dheen thum jug jug dhaathae sabadhae dhaehi bujhaaee ||1||

I am poor and meek, and throughout the ages, You are the Great Giver - please, grant me the understanding of the Shabad. ||1||

har jeeo kirapaa karahu thum piaarae ||

O Dear Beloved Lord, please show mercy to me.

sathigur dhaathaa mael milaavahu har naam dhaevahu aadhhaarae || rehaao ||

Unite me in the Union of the True Guru, the Great Giver, and give me the support of the Lord's Name. ||Pause||

naam can only be obtained from satguru ji no1 else, satguru ji has been present thorughout the ages but in this worst age of kalyug there was a need for guru nanak dev ji the highest of all to enter the world and give us gurmat n gurmantr.

without maharaj we have no hope. mahrajs first hukam is to accept the path.

jo tho praem khaelan kaa chaao ||

If you desire to play this game of love with Me,

sir dhhar thalee galee maeree aao ||

then step onto My Path with your head in hand.

if we do not give our head to mahraj then what hope do we have of crossing this world ocean? we need a boat n thats naam, without taking amrit the naam inside us is not enlightened and we carry on wandering in darkness.

the naam drih issue has been going on for ages n its getting boring now, if you want to understand naam drih completely then receive it. people that have not experienced it cannot comment on it and its fruits. even without naam drih naam abhyaas is fruitful so just carry on jappin naam. one day hopefully we wil get to a stage where we can truely jap naam with every breath n forever stay in naam ras.

these are just my humble opinions.

bhull chuk maaf

waheguroooo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
    • The printer is C J Amritsar… They have given a mobile number for India …
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use