Jump to content

Girls What Do You Think?


Guest Guest
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest Guest

I'd personally would wanna live in my own house or just to stay in the in-laws house for awhile, with the intention of moving out.

If people did impose on my freedom or space too much, that would really stress me out and i would probably leave, or make the search for a new house the priority.

I find guys who live at home with their parents are fairly useless - like they may be in their 30's but still cannot look after themselves - like they cannot feed themselves or wash their own clothes etc. I would find it difficult to respect that person as a "man", as its more the behaviour of a child.

If the wife is ill or something, its then the husbands MOTHER that has to look after her, like feed her etc - which to me, is just ridiculous! It should be the husband who looks after the wife.

Also, there is normally pressure on the new couple to produce a baby fairly quickly - i have seen this happen time and time again.

Also, i do not think women are treated equally in these households - they do all the housework, whilst the guys do nothing.

Who would want a man like that? Yeah, he may be nice etc, but these types of guys, practically tend to be useless and give extra burden of work to their wives, who mostly tend to be younger than the husband. Also, there is sometimes emphasis on men looking for educated, modern women (like they dont want a pindu or something). So, they get someone, educated, with a good job but then that woman goes home to a household where her spirit is caged.

Of course not all families are like this, but mostly mothers-in-laws always seem to treat daughters-in-laws badly - like, their cooking isnt good enough, their cleaning isnt good enough etc. It is rare to find a nice mother-in-law.

Even my own sister-in-law said her life was better before marriage. She loves my brother, but is tired of living in the family home because my mum always gives her pressure. My buv is a cool guy but cos he lives at home he leaves all the housework to my mum and his wife, so i believe he does not treat her equally. He is lovely, but i do see him as a child rather than a "man", even though he is now a father.

Asain families tend to let guys have it easy and girls, to have more burden. Its just a fact. I see this everywhere - my own family, cousins, friends, in the UK and in India.

And also, why does the girl have to get to know the mans family by having to live with them? Why cant the man also get to know the girls family in this way? It is all one sided.

Most of the time, there is no equality in Sikh families - even those that practise Sikhi. The set up between a Sikh family and a Muslim family are not that different...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd personally would wanna live in my own house or just to stay in the in-laws house for awhile, with the intention of moving out.

If people did impose on my freedom or space too much, that would really stress me out and i would probably leave, or make the search for a new house the priority.

I find guys who live at home with their parents are fairly useless - like they may be in their 30's but still cannot look after themselves - like they cannot feed themselves or wash their own clothes etc. I would find it difficult to respect that person as a "man", as its more the behaviour of a child.

If the wife is ill or something, its then the husbands MOTHER that has to look after her, like feed her etc - which to me, is just ridiculous! It should be the husband who looks after the wife.

Also, there is normally pressure on the new couple to produce a baby fairly quickly - i have seen this happen time and time again.

Also, i do not think women are treated equally in these households - they do all the housework, whilst the guys do nothing.

Who would want a man like that? Yeah, he may be nice etc, but these types of guys, practically tend to be useless and give extra burden of work to their wives, who mostly tend to be younger than the husband. Also, there is sometimes emphasis on men looking for educated, modern women (like they dont want a pindu or something). So, they get someone, educated, with a good job but then that woman goes home to a household where her spirit is caged.

Of course not all families are like this, but mostly mothers-in-laws always seem to treat daughters-in-laws badly - like, their cooking isnt good enough, their cleaning isnt good enough etc. It is rare to find a nice mother-in-law.

Even my own sister-in-law said her life was better before marriage. She loves my brother, but is tired of living in the family home because my mum always gives her pressure. My buv is a cool guy but cos he lives at home he leaves all the housework to my mum and his wife, so i believe he does not treat her equally. He is lovely, but i do see him as a child rather than a "man", even though he is now a father.

Asain families tend to let guys have it easy and girls, to have more burden. Its just a fact. I see this everywhere - my own family, cousins, friends, in the UK and in India.

And also, why does the girl have to get to know the mans family by having to live with them? Why cant the man also get to know the girls family in this way? It is all one sided.

Most of the time, there is no equality in Sikh families - even those that practise Sikhi. The set up between a Sikh family and a Muslim family are not that different...

its more of a cultural thing as to why the woman does the cooking, and house work. In india the men would be the ones working on the farm doing all the hard labour, and the women would be back at the house doing all the cooking and cleaning and looking after the family. It is unfortunate that a lot of the older generation retain this culture/traditions in this country. Even in english society this was the norm. Times are changing, a lot of men enjoy cooking and helping out with house work, my dad helps out a lot. My pabi was never pressured or anything and really enjoyed living with us. you just have to try to find a more westernised family i guess.

im a bit unsure why u made that last point about the sikh and muslim family set up. and i dont know anything about muslim family life to make a fair comparison

fateh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Akirtghan
ive never ever heard of the boy going to live with the wifes family

thats called being a ghar jawai, its discouraged in our culture

Why is that?
hey dont shoot the messenger :wub: , i duno the answer :D
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Guest
its more of a cultural thing as to why the woman does the cooking, and house work. In india the men would be the ones working on the farm doing all the hard labour, and the women would be back at the house doing all the cooking and cleaning and looking after the family. It is unfortunate that a lot of the older generation retain this culture/traditions in this country. Even in english society this was the norm. Times are changing, a lot of men enjoy cooking and helping out with house work, my dad helps out a lot. My pabi was never pressured or anything and really enjoyed living with us. you just have to try to find a more westernised family i guess.

im a bit unsure why u made that last point about the sikh and muslim family set up. and i dont know anything about muslim family life to make a fair comparison

fateh

Hi Malkeet,

I made that point about there seems to be not much of a difference between Sikh and Muslim families cos, Muslim families believe domestic duties are the work of females, it says that in the Quaran and Sikh families are supposed to believe that men and women are equal, the only one above a man or a woman is God - and that is the only hierachy.

Im not having a go at Muslim families cos i can see where they are coming from and i accept their beliefs that are written in the Quaran etc and so it makes sense to me about their family set up. However, in a Sikh family, a different set of beliefs are taught to their children - but the family set up tends to be the same, which (to me) is illogical. Shouldnt then, everyone should chip in?

Also, i understand about in India men did farming mostly and women did mostly domestic chores - which i agree with cos they are both working, doing their bit. What i dont agree with is if a woman has a job etc, BUT still has to do everything else - she is then doing more than the guys and thats pretty out of order (i think)

Im glad your pabi was never pressurised and enjoyed living with you! I hope i can find a loving family like yours to join!

Im not saying living with in-laws will always be a bad expereince, but from what i can see of other peoples expereinces, your kind of family is hard to find and it is more likely that girls will find themselves in an old-fashioned thinking family - even if the guy they marry (like my bro), is a decent sort.

Im pretty educated and i love my job, so i would be looking for a family that accepts that i have a job and would encourage their son to help with the household chores, cos i know i would get tired if i was expected to do it all the time etc and that is mostly the reason why i would opt to live in my own place - cos id like to do things when i am ready to do them, not at the timetable of the in-laws (ie, housework, babies etc) and i like to have my space also.

But of course, i would be supportive of my in-laws etc, like i wouldnt just move out and then never speak to them again. I would still have a relationship with them...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Definitely the Guru Sahibs would be a heavier Scriptures to handle. Dasam Granth is more towards Bir Rass, Guru Gobind Singh showed his Greatness (of course, they would never say this) by separating his own Baania.  And the BIGGEST test of all?? Do we try and read Dasam Granth, Understand n show respect like we do to SGGS? Or... Do we QUESTION it? Guru Gobind Singh Ji is testing us. 
    • My wife will be going for an MRI scan next week but her Kara won’t physically come off.  Is there any way the mri scan can be done with the Kara still on?  The alternative is we will have to try to saw it off before the scan.  
    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use