Sikh Propaganda

[N30S1NGH]

Namstang,

I've been to Kaneda thanks and no I didn't think it was that beautiful. I thought Sweden was much more beautiful than Kaneda and the Swedish Goray much more friendlier.

The situation you're seeing in Canada is the same as it was in Birmingham in the 60s and Southall in the 80s. Sikhs and Muslims getting along because Sikhs were in the majority in their areas and Muslims were minorities. Where Sikhs are in a Majority the Muslims get treated well but when the roles are reversed like in places like Bradford, Muslims are not so tolerant and same will be the case in Canada. You've already had a start with some Muslims getting arrested trying to organise the televised beheading of the Canadian PM. In many ways the Muslims in Canada have been bolder than the ones in UK as they tried to bring Sharia Law into Canada whereas the Uk Muslims haven't tried that yet. Wait a few years when they get more and more Muslims into your areas and then come back in a few years and let us know how much tolerance and love there is still. Canada has been lucky that they have had a large influx of families from Punjab but once that dries up and Muslim numbers increase then what is happening in UK will start in Canada as well.

thanks for your response, i m not sure why only muslims were singled out when you mentioned: Muslims getting arrested trying to organise the televised beheading of the Canadian PM. So called our chardi-kalah kharkhoos have done same kurtota of threating kill former canadian pm here:

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2007/05/04/...a-mulroney.html

Admit or not- all the dharms have sharia panths/ people with terrorist intent.

Hindu gots fascist rss, muslims got fascists talibans, christians got IRA, buddhist got their own in tebat, sikhs have babar khalsa international (separate from orginal bk), hijacked version of isyf.

chardi-kalah isnt it?

[proactive]

Namstang

This was the relevant quote from the newspaper link

But in the memo, Belanger says he's concerned the arrests could increase tensions. He says a week earlier, the Canadian government received an anonymous letter threatening to kill Mulroney.

The writer also threatens to "blast" the Toronto subway system, movie theatres and banks unless the government agrees to free Parmar and his associates. But the threats never materialized.

Look at the evidence against the Muslims who were planning a live beheading and the evidence against the Babbar Khalsa..lol. An anonymous letter.. didn't one of the American lawyers working for the immigration department also send herself threatening letters when she was fighting the case against two Singhs trying to get political asylum!

Btw did you know that 12% of Canadian Muslims polled stated that the plot to behead the Canadian PM was Justified. That's about 84000 Muslims. How many Sikhs would have supported Mulrooney being killed even if Babbar Khalsa had even wanted to attack him.

[Guest Akirtghan]

How many Sikhs would have supported Mulrooney being killed even if Babbar Khalsa had even wanted to attack him.

only one way to find out, do another poll like that

[N30S1NGH]

Namstang

This was the relevant quote from the newspaper link

But in the memo, Belanger says he's concerned the arrests could increase tensions. He says a week earlier, the Canadian government received an anonymous letter threatening to kill Mulroney.

The writer also threatens to "blast" the Toronto subway system, movie theatres and banks unless the government agrees to free Parmar and his associates. But the threats never materialized.

Look at the evidence against the Muslims who were planning a live beheading and the evidence against the Babbar Khalsa..lol. An anonymous letter.. didn't one of the American lawyers working for the immigration department also send herself threatening letters when she was fighting the case against two Singhs trying to get political asylum!

Btw did you know that 12% of Canadian Muslims polled stated that the plot to behead the Canadian PM was Justified. That's about 84000 Muslims. How many Sikhs would have supported Mulrooney being killed even if Babbar Khalsa had even wanted to attack him.

you are getting into numbers now, do you know what population of muslims around the globe? 1.2 billion and whats population of sikhs around the globe 32 million?

So its very natural -muslims fanatics outnumbering sikh fanatics.. yea? wait until sikhs passes the mark 1.1 billion, i m sure sikh fanatics will replicate like HIV AIDS.

i dont know why its hard for sikhs to admit, fanaticism is a disease, its a global problem, its shared by all- hindu, muslims, including sikhs, christians, buddhist, atheist, satan worshippers - red, yellow, white, gays etc etc.

tell me an difference between fascist taliban mullah who brainwashes youths, and tell all are kafirs, therefore should be killed and fascist khalistani who brainwashes youths against hindus, hindus are our dushmans, kill 50,000 hindus.

where is sam dristhi that sri guru gobind singh gave his singhs?

[N30S1NGH]

How many Sikhs would have supported Mulrooney being killed even if Babbar Khalsa had even wanted to attack him.

only one way to find out, do another poll like that

lol..classic one :wub:

[proactive]

The poll was of just canadian Muslims hence 12% is 84,000 people. So if you have 8 Muslim friends chances are one of them think it's a good idea to behead the PM of canada on TV. I would be surprised if 25 Sikhs could be found in Canada who would say that Babbar Khalsa killing Mulrooney would have been justified.

Which Khalistani leader says kill Hindus? I hope your not going on about that speech in NY by one of the Singhs accused of Air India bombing. Show me one video where a Khalistani leader says kill Hindus, go on youtube and you'll see countless Muslims saying that killing Kafirs is a good thing.

[Guest Akirtghan]

did u see that cbc documentry on surrey nagar kirtan? in that video, i dun rem the name of the person but he says, he wont rest till he's killed X number of hindus (i think 50,000).

[Guest Dancing Warrior]

proactive

Unlike some people on here who are quick to criticise ALL the views of some members just because they disagree with one view of theirs. I support Sarpanch and Militant on some issues because their views tally with mine but on others such as their undue hatred of Hindus, their bahmanophobia if you like, and their lack of criticism of Muslims I have countered their views.

I rest my case, and bow :WW: to a superior talent who has the ability to put nails in his own coffin and bury himself in the putrid hate that he and his like support.

Well done old chap, :nihungsmile:

Ps you may want to check your other posts on other topics they make up the bahmanophobia you think you lack!

o' dear o'dear :wub:

[N30S1NGH]

The poll was of just canadian Muslims hence 12% is 84,000 people. So if you have 8 Muslim friends chances are one of them think it's a good idea to behead the PM of canada on TV. I would be surprised if 25 Sikhs could be found in Canada who would say that Babbar Khalsa killing Mulrooney would have been justified.

What makes you soo sure that all 84,000 votes came in from canada, since it was web post, it could be anywhere from world.

Which Khalistani leader says kill Hindus? I hope your not going on about that speech in NY by one of the Singhs accused of Air India bombing. Show me one video where a Khalistani leader says kill Hindus, go on youtube and you'll see countless Muslims saying that killing Kafirs is a good thing.

.

yes that speech in NY.

You see countless muslims saying that killing kafirs is a good thing because of muslim population is 1.2 billion . Wait until sikh population passes 1.2 billion you will see same effect. i can gaurantee you.

As i said- fanaticism is global problem shared by all, not one country, religion, culture, tribe.

[kds1980]

Namstang

This was the relevant quote from the newspaper link

But in the memo, Belanger says he's concerned the arrests could increase tensions. He says a week earlier, the Canadian government received an anonymous letter threatening to kill Mulroney.

The writer also threatens to "blast" the Toronto subway system, movie theatres and banks unless the government agrees to free Parmar and his associates. But the threats never materialized.

Look at the evidence against the Muslims who were planning a live beheading and the evidence against the Babbar Khalsa..lol. An anonymous letter.. didn't one of the American lawyers working for the immigration department also send herself threatening letters when she was fighting the case against two Singhs trying to get political asylum!

Btw did you know that 12% of Canadian Muslims polled stated that the plot to behead the Canadian PM was Justified. That's about 84000 Muslims. How many Sikhs would have supported Mulrooney being killed even if Babbar Khalsa had even wanted to attack him.

you are getting into numbers now, do you know what population of muslims around the globe? 1.2 billion and whats population of sikhs around the globe 32 million?

So its very natural -muslims fanatics outnumbering sikh fanatics.. yea? wait until sikhs passes the mark 1.1 billion, i m sure sikh fanatics will replicate like HIV AIDS.

i dont know why its hard for sikhs to admit, fanaticism is a disease, its a global problem, its shared by all- hindu, muslims, including sikhs, christians, buddhist, atheist, satan worshippers - red, yellow, white, gays etc etc.

tell me an difference between fascist taliban mullah who brainwashes youths, and tell all are kafirs, therefore should be killed and fascist khalistani who brainwashes youths against hindus, hindus are our dushmans, kill 50,000 hindus.

where is sam dristhi that sri guru gobind singh gave his singhs?

dear namstang

Its very easy to blame fanatics but tell me who elects these fanatics.in 1971 bangladesh got independence.sheikh mujibur promised that he will make bangladesh a seculer country what happened after that bangladesh is now becoming more and more islamic country.it is now a well known fact that hindu population in bangladesh is declining.on the other take a look at west bengal from past 30 years it is under control of communists.it is the state where there is least influence of rss.Even cow slaughter is allowed in that state

so two states with same people same language,same culture but one is in control of communists while other is going towards fanatic islam.so there is no way you can say that only fanatics are to blame.majority of muslims do share the blame for islamic fanaticism.you can just look at different islamic countries

again and again common muslims vote for parties which are pro islam.

One person here rightly said as long as muslims are in minority everything remains o.k. as they become majority then all non muslims get beware.even

the so called seculer islamic countries have laws which are biased against non muslims.