Jump to content

Lion Vs Tiger? Who Will Win?


N30S1NGH
 Share

Recommended Posts

Why not breed a lion and a tiger to create........... A LIGER!

aries-liger-cub-hercules-picture.jpg

I could rule the world with such beasts! Although I'd have to put some armour on them as pachaare liger's bones aren't as strong as they should be due to the cross breeding. Also I wonder if he'd be as effective if I kept him on a vegetarian diet? If I'm not eating meat then neither is my liger. On second thoughts this a terrible plan.

That thing looks part human too. Is that you in the driver's seat?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not breed a lion and a tiger to create........... A LIGER!

aries-liger-cub-hercules-picture.jpg

I could rule the world with such beasts! Although I'd have to put some armour on them as pachaare liger's bones aren't as strong as they should be due to the cross breeding. Also I wonder if he'd be as effective if I kept him on a vegetarian diet? If I'm not eating meat then neither is my liger. On second thoughts this a terrible plan.

I think I'll stick to my zebroid.

Zeedonk_800.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always thought the lion would win.. but i always favored the tiger especially the white tiger who i have a very soft spot for...i also read on the internet (cannot remember what site) that singh meant tiger which always stuck in my mind because for a long time i thought it meant lion............... the white tiger being the most beautiful animal i have ever witnessed....

wt.jpg

White-Tiger-Wallpaper.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Singh is derived from the Sanskrit Sim-ha or Sin-ha. In many Indian states, Lion is referred to as Singha.

Sri Lanka or Cey-Lon was originally pronounced 'Sinh-alay' or home of the Lion.

Singapore, was originally Singa-Pura - land of the Lions.

In Thai, Lion is pronounced Sing-to.

Lol, even in Swahili (tongue of the Masai) Lion is refered to as 'Sim-ba'...

It's pretty clear that 'Singh' is derived from an older source meaning Lion.

Re Tiger Vs Lion, it's a pretty stupid debate. In nature, top predators avoid each other for the large part, in the unique region of India where these top cats lived as neighbours, they would not have usually entered each others territories, they would have scented their land to keep each other way. It is common for a Lion to ignore the warning and enter another Lions domain or a Tiger to enter a Tigers (by way of challenge) but for a Tiger or Lions to enter each others.. no.

That aside, they are top predators and pretty evenly matched. The Tiger is however bigger and more commonly fights to the death in a challenge match, fighting to the death is less common in Lion challenges.

Nearly all the video footage and documented cases of Lion Vs Tiger in captivity (the only place they have ever been seen fighting) scores the Tiger the winner. But this does not prove anything per se. The Cats are not in their natural environment for starters so psychology is different/changed. It could be the Tiger handles prison better than a Lion.

If we were to talk about the Amur (Siberian) Tiger, then I think it would come down to size as the Amur Tiger is the giant amongst cats and actually possibly the top land predator on Earth (many reported cases of it killing/predating Brown Bears, who themselves are a top predator). Only the Polar Bear or Kodiak Bear (biggest Brown from Kodiak islands) could contest the title.

But again, in nature, it impossible for an Amur and Lion to meet, so it’s a pointless discussion. The Lion is King of its land, as the Tiger it’s King of it’s land.

The Leopard however is the elusive champion, it lives in the land of all the top cats (including Amur), yet is the most successful at surviving and hunting (even though it would be killed in most cases in a fight with it's Masters).

We as Khalsa can take inspiration from both Tiger and Lion, they are Kings of their domain, as we should be. That domain first and foremost is the mind. We must defeat the minds tempatations, distractions and illusions, we must defeat the demons (panj vaikaar). They are relentless, we slay and new army of demons arrives. We progress in our bhagti/sikhi/rehit and the they pull us back down to hell in a moment’s unconscious pride... We need to take understanding from Chandi di Vaar – and apply that continued and unwavering destruction on the relentless, fearless and ferocious demons, who keep appearing army after army, King after King.. with one objective, to destroy Chandi....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tigers are awesome theres a lot we can learn from the stalking and combat style of the tiger...pentra, jhatka..

Nihang Baba Ram Singh explained the finesse involved in 'chatka gatka' Penthra by giving a beautiful analogy, that of a tiger hunting a wild boar:

'Now, you have the tiger. It never forsakes Pentra. Even if it is in a cage, it either stays sitting or if it moves it moves in Pentra. The foremost aspect today is when today's young Gatkabaj move, they are weak in Pentra. In fact, they have no Pentra. He who is weak on Pentra cannot be a Gatkabaj. A tiger corners an animal but does not attack [blindly]. Lets say a boar gets cornered by a tiger. The front mouth, its tusks, are very dangerous if they catch the tiger as they will not let him go. That is why the tiger leaps [to evade] this way, or otherwise that boar ends up attacking instead of the tiger. He leaps over there from there over there. I have seen in the jungle whilst hunting myself that a tiger will corner a boar for up to eight hours. He only attacks when his attack won't go without fruit, or the tiger, attacks the boar after 3pm [indian summer] because between 3pm and 4pm he gets sleepy, or, tiger leaps over boar, behind him, and then pounces on his back in such a manner that all his back is crushed and he is not capable of running. Likewise, a true 'Gatkai' (practitioner) only then gives Chatka [killing strike] of hand when his blow will not go empty. Today's Gatka is an ox-beating game just striking stick on stick.'


(Nihang Baba Ram Singh, transcript of interview, 17th April 1998)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • what’s a rajput jatt sikh  you’re either jatt or you’re not jatt
    • If relationship with Guru is strong, then kanga is done twice a day, and turban should never be taken off or put on like a hat, there is a lot wrong with that as it is against rehit! maryada is to take off every layer of turban/pagh/dumalla individually, and tie fresh turban each time!
    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use