Sikhs Win Khalistan Debate On Bbc - Listen For Yourself

[SaRpAnCh]

Tell tht baman Ash to come and meet us on the so called 'battlefield' hes on about lets see his arms bloody terrorist ,

MESSAGE TO SIKH FEDERATION / DAVINDERJIT SINGH

Im not educated in the law and that but what that Ash guy said breaks the law I believe and if a police complaint is filed the BBC have to give the details of the caller, how do we make a complaint and what laws has he broken cos I know he has

[mann_kaum_layee_qurbaan]

lol.. Sikhs cant even manage a Gurdwara without fighting each other, so forget about a whole nation lol

India has a sikh prime minister and he seems to be doing quite well. so if a sikh can run a country of over 1 billion people, what more proof do you need?

peace.

[chatanga]

why do you sikhs feel that we must have sum kind of mega super state just for khalistan to be viable?

the fact is that 60 years of being hinuds/indians has seriously weakened our nation. In khalistan we would neva have the kinda stuff that went on under ravan raaj, ie genocide, yet all you seem to to be thinking about is the finances. THEY WILL NEVER ACCEPT YOU AS EQUAL!!!

It is better to live 1 day as a free man than 100 days as a slave. im sure that Guru Gobind Singh would back me up on that.

[sikha]

lol.. khalistan is hilarious.. who will control it? Akj, taksal, nihangs? who+ they'll fight each other till death the day we get a state lol

[Kharku]

the reson sikhi has survived is because we gett attacked, when we get attacked we come back stronger. brings ekta

with khalistan who is there to attack us. well be fighting each other.

[Guest peacemaker]

well be fighting each other.

That's why there will never be "Khalistan" in a physical sense.

[Kharku]

make changes to PUNJAB, say no a BIG NO to khalistan.

[Guest peacemaker]

make changes to PUNJAB, say no a BIG NO to khalistan.

*Waits for the hardcore people to read that* :think

[AvnitK]

well its kinda like 50,50

u know like some people want khalistan some people don't want khalistan

then theres people who don't really care

[chatanga]

sikha your reasoning is hilarious more than anything. so what if there are indiviudal groups who have different views over sikhi? that duz not mean they have different views over wanting freedom. in fact freedom from ravan raaj is what will keep them united.

there were 12 sikh misals, 1 (patiala even openly went aginst the other 11) who would fight each other over villages etc. however when the xternal enemy (abdali etc) caem they would unite as one to fight.

What you want is for the whole panth to be united on evrything before we can even use the word Khalistan. Nowhere in the world, in any country has there been any people who have been abslutely united.

In isreal there are jews who very disunited. If you sed to them give the palestininas some land, they are very united.

in pakistan there is fighting between shias and sunnis. if you sed to break pakistan up and join india again, they would laugh.

what about countrys like usa who have possibly every existing comminuty from all over the world there? would they give the usa back to the native americans? or would all these diffferent tribes be united for their own freedom?

there is no guarantee that Khalistan would survive. but then again Baba Banda SIngh never knew that the Sikh state he founded would survive or not but he still fought for the welfare of the Sikhs. same for the misals who were not sure the the Sikh rule woudl survive,but they never gave up hope.

Sure there have been states which have struggled since tey were born, abnd some have flourished. but that is karma. The arguments you have forward are "pendu" arguments. Again I repeat that it is better to live 1 day as a free man than 100 as a slave.

chatanga